Skip to main content

Man Loses $22,000 In New 'Policing For Profit' Case 

 

By Phil Williams
Chief Investigative Reporter

MONTEREY, Tenn. -- "If somebody told me this happened to them, I absolutely would not believe this could happen in America."

 

That was the reaction of a New Jersey man who found out just how risky it can be to carry cash through Tennessee.

 

New Jersey driver George Reby 

 

For more than a year, NewsChannel 5 Investigates has been shining a light on a practice that some call "policing for profit." 


See previous stories: 
"NC5 Investigates: Policing For Profit"


In this latest case, a Monterey police officer took $22,000 off the driver -- even though he had committed no crime.

 

"You live in the United States, you think you have rights -- and apparently you don't," said George Reby.

 

As a professional insurance adjuster, Reby spends a lot of time traveling from state to state. But it was on a trip to a conference in Nashville last January that he got a real education in Tennessee justice.

 

"I never had any clue that they thought they could take my money legally," Reby added. "I didn't do anything wrong."

 

Reby was driving down Interstate 40, heading west through Putnam County, when he was stopped for speeding.

 

A Monterey police officer wanted to know if he was carrying any large amounts of cash.

 

"I said, 'Around $20,000,'" he recalled. "Then, at the point, he said, 'Do you mind if I search your vehicle?' I said, 'No, I don't mind.' I certainly didn't feel I was doing anything wrong. It was my money."

 

$1,000 rolls from George Reby's bag 

 

That's when Officer Larry Bates confiscated the cash based on his suspicion that it was drug money.


Officer Larry Bates, Monterey Police 

 

"Why didn't you arrest him?" we asked Bates.

 

"Because he hadn't committed a criminal law," the officer answered.

 

Bates said the amount of money and the way it was packed gave him reason to be suspicious.

"The safest place to put your money if it's legitimate is in a bank account," he explained. "He stated he had two. I would put it in a bank account. It draws interest and it's safer."

 

"But it's not illegal to carry cash," we noted.

 

"No, it's not illegal to carry cash," Bates said. "Again, it's what the cash is being used for to facilitate or what it is being utilized for."

 

NewsChannel 5 Investigates noted, "But you had no proof that money was being used for drug trafficking, correct? No proof?"

 

"And he couldn't prove it was legitimate," Bates insisted. 

 

Bates is part of a system that, NewsChannel 5 Investigates has discovered, gives Tennessee police agencies the incentive to take cash off of out-of-state drivers. If they don't come back to fight for their money, the agency gets to keep it all.

 

"This is a taking without due process," said Union City attorney John Miles. 

 

Read the rest of this innocent man's ordeal: 

http://www.newschannel5.com/st...cing-for-profit-case

 



Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

"The police force is watching the people

but the people just don't understand"

"America ! Where are you now?

Don't you care about your sons and daughters

Don't you know, we need you now, we can't fight alone

against the monster "

Steppenwolf - The Monster

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-7uwshsfFI

 

 

For some reason, this song seems to have remained relevant since the day it was first recorded and put out in 1969. I guess it is because it is a historical account of our country , and pretty dammed accurate.

question is, will the man get his money back, or is this really just a case of highway robbery made

ok legal because some cop with a god complex thought he could just take the money and run.

 

Interventor, where do you get that crap. NO , Liberals are not for this stuff. In fact, it is the conservatives that are so intent on continuing to wage this rediculous "war on drugs".

If I had to guess, my bet would be that that redneck cop votes Republican.

 

 


 

The LEO in the article violated this man's rights by unlawful search and seizure and pretty much stole this mans money. That law was enacted to help stop the trafficking of drugs and LEO's there are applying it in cases where they have no proof of such activity hoping the person or persons won't come back and fight for their money. What happened to law enforcement having to have proof before just coming in and seizing whatever they want? If I was him, I'd definitely go back and fight for my money back. I'd also keep all receipts for travel expenses and missed work for the city of Monterey to reimburse once I filed suit against them and got my money back. Some folks don't trust/use banks, especially older people. That doesn't make them a criminal. With the economy and government now days, more people aren't using banks and are keeping cash and buying gold and silver bullion. Some of these same people feel that there could be some collapse of government and mass lawlessness will ensue and have also stocked up on guns and ammunition. If that does happen, good luck getting to any of your cash in the banks. You never know....

 

That's exactly why police won't get the full cooperation they want, at least not from me anymore, not without a warrant. I've been asked if they could look in my vehicle one time in my life after I was stopped for a tag light being out and I gladly complied. The "look" turned out to be an overly aggressive search that took 45 minutes while I stood on the side of the interstate in 30 degree weather wearing only a t-shirt and pants freezing my ass off. The officer didn't even offer to let me get my jacket, even though he already knew he didn't intend to just take a quick look. After all was said and done, I was left with all of my clothes that were neatly packed and folded literally stuffed back into my bag, and some that didn't make it back into my bag. He also went through my fishing tackle box and didn't secure the clasp back and I had everything from hooks to weights strewn all throughout my trunk. My car was a mess, everything was out of place. I keep my prescription receipts for our taxes neatly stored in a two-fold case in my glove box so they won't get misplaced and he apparently went through all of them as they were pulled out of their case and just strewn back in my glove box (some in the floor). What gives anyone the right to violate my privacy in such a way to look through my families personal prescription receipts? Really?

 

Needless to say, I felt extremely violated. I really felt like he violated my rights to unlawfully search my vehicle and personal belongings in the manner that he did. He misled me and took advantage of my kindness to allow him to "look around". Violated my trust by turning it into a full aggressive search of every single thing in my vehicle without putting anything back in it's original condition and place.

 

That will be the last time I ever consent to any kind of my lawful rights being violated and this article only furthers my stance on the issue. I also have the right to refuse to answer any questions not related to the reason I was stopped. I won't be answering any questions as to where I'm going or where I've been, or how much money I have. That's none of their business. The only business/questions a LEO has with a citizen is questions pertaining to the reason a citizen was stopped/detained and supplying any identification, registration, and insurance information.

 

It's unfortunate to have to be this way with law enforcement that your supposed to trust. Law enforcement that we, as children, and that we have taught our own children, to trust and respect. There has just been too many injustices by some LEO's that have violated the trust and rights of citizens to put one-selves in danger by answering unnecessary questions and consenting to unnecessary searches.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×