Skip to main content

Reply to "B. Gray and Low-hanging Fruit"

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Hi VP,

 

Go back and really read the four articles I have posted above.  You will find they will answer your questions.   Of course, if you will not take the time to truly read and understand them, then we will have no common ground for a discussion.  We do not have to agree on everything; but, we do need to know what the other has written.  You cannot do that without reading my articles.  

 

The answers are there, even if you disagree with them.  But, I believe you will find my answers are Biblically correct if one views the Bible, all 66 books, as the inspired, inerrant, literal Written Word of God. 

 

If you do not, then we have a problem -- which cannot be solved; for then you would be looking at the Bible through liberal theology glasses.  And, God did not create the Bible to be view in that manner.  As I wrote earlier, "God said what He meant, and He meant what He said."   Nothing liberal or mythological about it.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

+++++++

Your famous four posts do not address the powerful teaching I described above from  I Thess. 1:3 &4, Hebrews 3:1 and 3:12, and  I Timothy 4:1, where the scriptures plainly teach that it is indeed possible for a person who is saved to later become lost.   There is no other rational way to interpret these passages and that apparently is the reason you are dodging them. 

 

It is evident from your evasive posts that you are  uncomfortable with these passages.  I suspect you have conferred with some of your fellow OSASers in the Calvary Chapel cult and have not gotten enough substance from them to credibly defend OSAS against the plain teaching of these powerful passages. Better, then, to remain silent than to put up some indefensible reply.  We have seen that before from you, Bill.


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×