Skip to main content

Reply to "Climate change poses security risks, according to decades of intelligence reports"

Jack Hammer posted:
OldSalt posted:
Jack Hammer posted:
How has the bogus climate claims of 30 years ago hurt today's 
realization of current conditions.? 
Now that we have more believable information.

I don't understand what you are trying convey or ask.   Are you saying you don't believe the climate science of 30 years ago but believe the climate science of today?  Or, are you trying to say that you only believe climate science that fits your world-view paradigm? 

What "bogus climate claims of 30 years ago" are you talking about?  What "realization of current conditions" are you talking about?  What "more believable information" are you talking about?

Forget it, wasn't my intention to soil your panties 

Wow.  I was just asking for clarification to your ambiguous post.  I'm ready to reasonably discuss this topic, but I need to know what you're talking about. 


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×