Skip to main content

Reply to "Democrat Party National Convention"

quote:
Originally posted by GoFish:
quote:
Originally posted by NashBama:
quote:
Evolution is often said to be "closer" to a law than a hypothesis because the theory is so very overwhelmingly supported by evidence but get this: EVOLUTION WILL NEVER BE "LAW" because it does not meet the aforementioned criteria for a law.




You're right, in other words there are some parts of the theory that can and have been proven, there are other parts that can't. Isn't that what I've already said?


No, that's not what you meant. You are being intentionally obtuse and dense.

Let me make it clear to you: What has been "proven" by a overwhelming preponderance of the evidence and to the complete and utter satisfaction of every known scientific discipline and organization on the planet is this: Man is a primate who evolved from earlier primates who evolved from lower mammals and so on.


I totally agree - one need only to look at bush to discover genetic link between apes and humans. He speaks somewhat like a human, he eats with utensils, he walks upright (but drags his knuckles), his appearence is rather simian like but more human in many respects. His intelligence level was displayed like a trained dog at Harvard, yet in application it lacks reason and success. Yes, yes, I do believe in evolution - and the fact that it may not be complete for some individuals.

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×