Contendah, my Friend,
Since you are ashamed to tell us which denomination, or church, you do follow -- we can only go by what we see in your writings. And, your writings sure do line us well with Herbert W. Armstrong to me. If I am wrong, prove it!
Bless your heart!
Bill
____
Once more, Bill, you demonstrate the depleted status of your thought processes. Anyone can accuse anyone else of adhering to any belief system and then demand that the person thus accused prove otherwise. The kind of false reasoning exemplified in such a demand is its insistence upon proof of a negative proposition. Since you, Bill, are polemically challenged, I should explain this further, in simple terms that even a buffoon such as you might possibly understand.
You have asserted a positive conclusion that I am aligned in some way with the theology of Herbert W. Armstrong. You have not provided any analysis whatsoever to show which, if any, of my beliefs are identical to the numerous and heretical doctrines of Armstrongism. You have simply made a broad ASSertion, without any kind of supporting detail whatsoever. Now you demand that I rebut your un-explicated ASSertion. That is silliness of the first water, Bill. Having asserted a vague and absurdly broad claim, without any specificity, you now expect me to refute the nonsensical proposition you have submitted. To the contrary, it is YOUR responsibility to buttress your bald claim with some kind of substance and detail. Absent some such amplification from you, I am left with the unreasonable task of describing and rebutting the totality of the Armstrong belief system, a task that would take much more of my time by far than you are worth.
I have numerous times, on this and other forums, rejected Armstrongism, with its silly-ass British Israelite bogus history and other absurdities. If I were a proponent of that crackpot system, I would defend it rather than reject it, but I have not made any defense of any of it. A reasonable person, knowing that, would not continue to make the absurd accusation--as YOU have made--that I hold in favor of the Armstrong belief system. You, however, have consistently shown yourself to be an unreasonable--and unreasoning--person, so I suppose I should not find it out of the ordinary that you would continue to propagate a claim that, given the history of my participation in this forum, is utterly absurd on its face.
Find yourself one of those geriatric cousultants, Bill, and see if he/she can offer some remedy, however mild or temporary, that can slow your ongoing progression into total senile cluelessness!