the majority of science is fictional jimmah. i've been there i know.
Darwin evolution is a fairy tale.
when you quit with making a fool out of yourself i'll know you have learned the big secret about science.
There is nothing left to say about how uneducated RtG is. He just gave us all of the information we need.
Whether you use, fiction, the word Rramn used or the one I would say which would be theoretical or hypothetical, his, yours, or mine are all subjective. A statement such as you made though about Rramn's intellect demonstrates, not analytical thinking but, a statement based in preconceived bias or prejudice. While it may be rational to make judgments about someone based upon the sum of their abilities, acts, and contributions still you have such a infinitesimal sample of that from here that any categorization of intelligence would still be more effected by your own biases than those of Rramms true intellect. Either way if you still limited your samples to only what was demonstrated on this forum the sum of his contribution compared to yours, negate our respective beliefs, show concept of thought and reasoning, on his part, to your one word or simple terse playground insults.
Science is not fiction. This is not an opinion. Long posts do not always lead to the truth. RTG has demonstrated his ignorance about many things, on many occasions in this forum. The same may be said for you. My opinion of RTG is not based on any bias. It is based on my experience in reading his posts, some of which defy understanding. You, on the other hand write such long-winded posts, in the tradition of Bill, that I usually scroll through them without reading, as experience tells me what they will say, and that I will disagree with you. If this is unsatisfactory to you, you are free to scroll through mine, as well. It has no effect on me; if you are unhappy with me, I don't care. This is not a popularity contest.