Skip to main content

Reply to "Removing The "Smoke Screen" From Alleged Bible Discrepancies"

Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:
Originally Posted by Magpie:

Rob, all these links I have visited to be fair to your argument.

The only way these links can be credible to the argument is by the semantics of them.

They are not evidence of Darwin evolution from common ancestor but simply to a false idea.

As a scientist I cannot assume gaps are filled when they certainly are not. You on the other hand have an idea that everything at one time started with life-form with serial #1. That idea is real only through semantics and does not require gap evidence.

Semantics are classical in nature. We have long since left the classical world in our investigations and the new quantum world will never be unified with  classical world wherein lieth the Cause.

You claim to be a scientist? Really? Could you please translate the second and last two sentences into English?

 

========================

Jimbo dear go here, read and come back if you don’t understand any idiot can use the word transitional.

 

 

http://www.talkorigins.org/faq...nsitional/email.html

Classical refers to what we see and touch that is explained by Newtonian physics.

The quantum world is not explained by Newtonian laws of physics. That’s what relativity is all about jimi the unified approach by Einstein to explain a quantum world he had doubts about. The mass of elementary particles [semantics] is unexplained. The LHC is looking for what else other than quarks and gluons are for instance inside the bound state of a proton. [ bound state means it has not been busted open letting the quarks and gluons escape to the outside where they don’t exist once they are outside. Now that’s

weird too]] Semantics give the idea that they are point particles. Are they? Could be. They behave like waves and particles when they actually are neither. They only have properties of waves and particles. The Graviton must be looked at by semantics. What is it/ a particle? A property of it is it’s effect is infinite or is there even such a thing as gravitational force. Current theories is that it is a constant falling into curved space-time and not a force. Gravity as a force does not explain how time slows near any object of mass. Semantics allow us to imagine the quantum world as li’l balls in orbit around one another. Well semantically they do just that. We even accelerate them head-on into one another and semantically explain the results as in billiards. Not the case. That’s classical, Newtonian. In the quantum world we do not know the classical position and momentum of a particle [semantics]. We use the term momentum referred to as mass times velocity. Semantics again. It is the time element and the energy since mass and energy are the same thing. [ E=mc^2]These classical behaviors ,when applied on a quantum level require the theories of relativity to NOT explain them as it turns out. Now that’s weird.


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×