L. Cranston posted:Jutu posted:L. Cranston posted:Jutu posted:L. Cranston posted:
Thanks for that highly intelligent reply.
I can see how you misunderstand a judge being impartial is the same as a Republican not being a Republican. You have the mentality of a 10 year old.
And still smarter than you! Ouchie crash, that has to hurt! I see you arguing about Republicans vs Dems on the subject of religious bigotry and being upset that you can't justify the left's bigotry. You tried by posting a non-story, then get upset when a real story, bigoted dem senators, is brought up. Why couldn't a Catholic judge be impartial? You seem to think a Muslim can be impartial. You are a bigot, just like your dem leaders.
You keep on posting those intelligent posts.
Judges being impartial is an integral part of the justice system. His ruling based on his religion instead of the law would be a waste of court time.
Republicans turning on Republicans because of Religion is only effecting Republicans.
Why couldn't a Judge of Mexican decent be impartial? That's Trump's own words! You can't stand being proven ignorant and it's still happening today. I'm tired of going in circles with someone of limited capacity of understanding. Your hate of anything you deem 'liberal' or 'Democrat' blocks your understanding and limits your ability to reason. Good day and happy blocking to you.
Hey crash, want to read hate go back and read your posts about Republicans. You are doing the same thing you've been doing about the bigots in the dem party. They can be bigots but no one else can be perceived to be. You can hate Republicans and anything Conservative, but everyone should adore the liberals. Now, again I ask, has there ever been an intelligent dem posting on here?
One last time... I'll type slow in hopes you can finally follow logic instead of Republican thinking.
If the judge were Muslim and had the same views, they'd still be against him, regardless of religious preference.
If the Republican leader were a Christian instead of Muslim, the Republicans would have no issue with his leadership.
Thus rendering your claim of 'because he was Catholic' a grandiose attempt at deflecting the issue.
I doubt any form of logic can get past your level of hate, but I did make one last attempt.
You are ridiculous. The judges all have some religion, yet you are saying the bigoted senators would object the same if he was a Muslim? Bull hockey. They changed an almost 200 year old rule to accommodate a Muslim. You keep wanting to talk about hate. Why are you allowed your hate for Republicans and yet take offense at every objection I make to your silly slanted posts and call those rebuttals hate? Am I supposed to "love" dems and just let your lies slide???