Skip to main content

Tagged With "Hillary Clinton"

Reply

Re: A Historic Contrast ... Unprecedented!

1130 ·
major dif on Biden family and Trump family. Biden bragged on camera of extorting Ukraine. Hunter Biden rode VP plane to other countries and came back a rich man. Trump was already rich, he has donated everyone of his presidential checks. His kids volunteer in their roles. No where have I heard of them receiving deals because of their father's position. Unlike Hunter, and of course Chelsea who received huge paychecks from NBC and the Clinton foundation. We have also spoken out about Romney...
Reply

Re: A Historic Contrast ... Unprecedented!

Robot Unicorn ·
First. Biden had support of SEVERAL COUNTRIES as well as UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS. The man fired wasn't prosecuting corruption and was PART OF THE PROBLEMS IN THE UKRAINE. Trump was hunting dirt on a political opponent. BIG DIFFERENCE. Next, prove Trump has any money whatsoever. I'll wait. Trump has his name on a lot of things, but you have no idea who owns any of it or what part Trump may/may not own. Trump's kids work in the Whitehouse. Ivanka got MILLIONS in trademarks from China while Trump...
Reply

Re: Trump administration violated the law by withholding Ukraine aid, Government Accountability Office says

Robot Unicorn ·
Without pressure from outside the Ukraine, from the US, the World Monetary Fund, and European Diplomats, the corrupt Ukraine government wouldn't have cared. Stop whining about investigations into Trump. Republicans started investigations into Bill Clinton before he ever took office. Republicans still chant 'Lock Her Up' at campaign rallies. Republicans don't get to act like they're innocent when they've been doing the same thing for over 3 decades.
Reply

Re: Trump administration violated the law by withholding Ukraine aid, Government Accountability Office says

1130 ·
you are so far off,,, Clinton has nothing to do with this,, however we all know her sins. Biden didn't have the authority to with hold funds. he used it to protect his son. Trump didn't tie funds to his request. plus if you can't see Biden's crime you might not want to debate.. cuz you don't have enough sense to see the truth if it slapped you In the face
Reply

Re: Trump administration violated the law by withholding Ukraine aid, Government Accountability Office says

Robot Unicorn ·
Well, in that case, Hillary has over 25 years with zero convictions. That doesn't stop your snot bubbles and incessant whining about President Clinton, President Obama or Former SoS Hillary.
Reply

Re: do we want congress tied up for 3 months?

Robot Unicorn ·
Sure, it's off topic of the impeachment. How many 'witches' turned up in the witch hunts? How many investigations, into the Clintons, have Republicans had? Did you know Republicans started investigating Bill Clinton before his swearing in as POTUS? and... Did you know the impeachment of POTUS Clinton began as an investigation into a real-estate deal? Seems awfully hypocritical of you Republicans to whine so much about Trump after doing the EXACT same thing to POTUS Clinton. You can lead a...
Reply

Re: Hillary Clinton ‘intimidated’ by Tulsi Gabbard's $50M lawsuit, won’t accept legal documents, lawyer claims: report

gbrk ·
I think that unless Bloomberg (my opinion, their strongest candidate) secures the nomination outright in the Convention there will be a brokered convention and the ultimate candidate that will come out as the brokered Democratic Candidate will be Hillary Clinton or Bloomberg.
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

bluetick ·
I agree with you peeler. Bill Clinton, in 8 years, repaired 200 years worth of economic problems and left office with a surplus of money. George W. must be the smartest man alive. He managed in, only 8 short years, to put this country deeper in debt than anyone ever dreamed possible and his followers blame it on Obama. Even if you do hate Obama,you gotta admit, he had a full plate when he took office. It ain't got no better for him, and he ain't gettin any help...from anybody. Anyone out...
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

skippy delepepper ·
It was Quite easy for Mr PANTS on the GROUND Clinton. He had no wars, except his botched attept in Somalia. He could of had Bin Ladin, but discided it was to much trouble to pick him up. He stripped the Military to bare bones. Yea it all looks good on paper. Clinton had no morals and should have been thrown out. Plus you guys forget who was in congress in charge when this disaster started. Freddy and ***** and bank forced to give loans to people who couldn't afford it. With the thugs in the...
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

peeler ·
Heh." He had no wars" Bush only had the one war that he started against Iraq under complete and false pretenses and the other one in Afghanistan, started after 9/11 occurred ON HIS WATCH! He could of had Bin Ladin , but discided it was to much trouble to pick him up. (sort of like it's too much trouble for you use spell checker?) And the REPUBLICANS, who ccontrolled congress for SIX of the FINAL NINE years of the clinton admin had nothing to do with Intelligence? If Congress is so powerful,...
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by peeler: Heh." He had no wars" Bush only had the one war that he started against Iraq under complete and false pretenses and the other one in Afghanistan, started after 9/11 occurred ON HIS WATCH! He could of had Bin Ladin , but discided it was to much trouble to pick him up. (sort of like it's too much trouble for you use spell checker?) And the REPUBLICANS, who ( ccontrolled )SIC congress for SIX of the FINAL NINE years of the ( clinton ) SIC admin had nothing to do...
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

peeler ·
Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by peeler: Heh." He had no wars" Bush only had the one war that he started against Iraq under complete and false pretenses and the other one in Afghanistan, started after 9/11 occurred ON HIS WATCH! He could of had Bin Ladin , but discided it was to much trouble to pick him up. (sort of like it's too much trouble for you use spell checker?) And the REPUBLICANS, who ( ccontrolled )SIC congress for SIX of the FINAL NINE years of the (...
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

CageTheElephant ·
I'm still waiting on the FACTS of the Clinton surplus...anybody? Or is the BS just going to keep piling up?
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

seeweed ·
Originally Posted by peeler: Heh." He had no wars" Bush only had the one war that he started against Iraq under complete and false pretenses and the other one in Afghanistan, started after 9/11 occurred ON HIS WATCH! He could of had Bin Ladin , but discided it was to much trouble to pick him up. (sort of like it's too much trouble for you use spell checker?) And the REPUBLICANS, who ccontrolled congress for SIX of the FINAL NINE years of the clinton admin had nothing to do with Intelligence?
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by seeweed: Originally Posted by peeler: Heh." He had no wars" A tipical Demacrat(socialist) responce. Lybia isn't a war it's a police action like Korea. Bush only had the one war that he started against Iraq under complete and false pretenses and the other one in Afghanistan, started after 9/11 occurred ON HIS WATCH! Obama was elected partially by promising to end Iraq and Afganistan. He started Lybia. Face it he had no idea what he was in for. President Bush had a little...
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

peeler ·
Wow - it is truly difficult to have an argument of wits with an unarmed person! Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by seeweed: Originally Posted by peeler: Heh." He had no wars" Bush only had the one war that he started against Iraq under complete and false pretenses and the other one in Afghanistan, started after 9/11 occurred ON HIS WATCH! Obama was elected partially by promising to end Iraq and Afganistan. He started Lybia. Face it he had no idea what he was in for.
Reply

Re: Repubs not interested in your opinions

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by peeler: Wow - it is truly difficult to have an argument of wits with an unarmed person! Originally Posted by skippy delepepper: Originally Posted by seeweed: Originally Posted by peeler: Heh." He had no wars" Bush only had the one war that he started against Iraq under complete and false pretenses and the other one in Afghanistan, started after 9/11 occurred ON HIS WATCH! Obama was elected partially by promising to end Iraq and Afganistan. He started Lybia. Face it he...
Reply

Re: Bill the former Birther?

b50m ·
I disagree that Bush would not have done the same thing. He was a lot more willing to go after Bin Laden than Obama. Both admins did the ground work to get Bin Laden. You can give Clinton some credit as well. This was not an operation that was formed and executed in a day. Originally Posted by bluetick: Bill, The president gave credit to the Bush administration. How do you figure it was bush's military? Barack Obama is commander in chief, and he is the one that sent those brave men into that...
Reply

Re: Bill the former Birther?

bluetick ·
It is sad that we may never know the names of these brave men. They deserve every honor we could give them. And you are right uno, Bush and Clinton deserve some of the credit. Once again we have a reason to be proud of America. And, I think I spoke out of turn...I don't know what George W would have done, maybe the same thing. I'd like to think so..
Reply

Re: Bill the former Birther?

seeweed ·
Bush seems to disagree with you on that point. He basically said he didn't care about Ben Laden . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PGmnz5Ow-o Originally Posted by b50m: I disagree that Bush would not have done the same thing. He was a lot more willing to go after Bin Laden than Obama. Both admins did the ground work to get Bin Laden. You can give Clinton some credit as well. This was not an operation that was formed and executed in a day. Originally Posted by bluetick: Bill, The president...
Reply

Re: Bill the former Birther?

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by bluetick: It is sad that we may never know the names of these brave men. They deserve every honor we could give them. And you are right uno, Bush and Clinton deserve some of the credit. Once again we have a reason to be proud of America. And, I think I spoke out of turn...I don't know what George W would have done, maybe the same thing. I'd like to think so.. Honestly guys, the wons that deserve the most praise is the Navy Seals team 6. But this was an American effort...
Reply

Re: Now this is just plain SICK!

JimiHendrix ·
Originally Posted by dogsoldier0513: Please PROVE that I am racist. Would a racist vote for Alan Keyes and attempt to sway Condi Rice to run for political office? There is no need to prove anything. You take care of that, yourself, quite often. If the shoe fits......... As for Condi Rice, her recent television appearances have show her to be not only a lier, but also a disaster as Sec of State. She was a willing participant in the Bush failures. Alan Keyes is black in the same way that...
Reply

Re: Ted Nugent: "Obama White House is Mao Zedong Fan Club"

O No! ·
Here is some info about the moron from Wiki: He has had two wives and has eight children, including three out of wedlock in two liaisons almost 30 years apart. In the late 1960s, prior to his first marriage, Nugent fathered a boy and a girl, who he gave up for adoption in infancy. This did not become public knowledge until 2010 or 2011. The siblings were adopted separately and had no contact with one another. The son learned the identity of his birth father in 2010 through the daughter's...
Reply

Re: Now this is just plain SICK!

Backwoods. ·
Originally Posted by JimiHendrix: Originally Posted by dogsoldier0513: Please PROVE that I am racist. Would a racist vote for Alan Keyes and attempt to sway Condi Rice to run for political office? There is no need to prove anything. You take care of that, yourself, quite often. If the shoe fits......... As for Condi Rice, her recent television appearances have show her to be not only a lier, but also a disaster as Sec of State. She was a willing participant in the Bush failures. Alan Keyes...
Reply

Re: Hardcore Jews

CageTheElephant ·
Hillary Clinton? "Sexually suggestive"?????
Reply

Re: Obama: The Muslim

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by dogsoldier0513: Obama The Muslim by Major Gen. Jerry Curry 07/27/2010 My mother believed in “common sense” testing. She said if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, waddles like a duck and acts like a duck; it’s a duck. She believed that actions speak louder than words and that only a liar said one thing and then did the opposite. Would President Obama pass my mother’s “is he a Muslim” test? Let’s see. President Obama says there is nothing more beautiful than the...
Reply

Re: Ted Nugent: "Obama White House is Mao Zedong Fan Club"

upsidedehead ·
Originally Posted by O No!: Here is some info about the moron from Wiki: He has had two wives and has eight children, including three out of wedlock in two liaisons almost 30 years apart. In the late 1960s, prior to his first marriage, Nugent fathered a boy and a girl, who he gave up for adoption in infancy. This did not become public knowledge until 2010 or 2011. The siblings were adopted separately and had no contact with one another. The son learned the identity of his birth father in...
Reply

Re: Trump intimidated by OBama

O No! ·
Let's see...Newt is a bald faced liar: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_FACT_CHECK_GINGRICH?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-05-13-09-20-31 He thinks it's great that a company making a multi-million dollar profit weaseled out of paying taxes: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GINGRICH?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-05-13-12-04-34 And that must be so he doesn't have to feel guilty about not paying his OWN taxes:...
Reply

Re: Nancy Pelosi (What's Good for the Goose is not Good for Her Gander)

Mr.Dittohead ·
The waiver in SanFran allows insurers to set lower limits on annual benefits than OBamaCare will eventually allow, because right now the benefits are arbitrarily low. The waiver in NV allows insurers to continue to spend only 75% of premiums on benefits, the so-called medical loss ratio. In the 1990's, when Clinton was trying to reform healthcare, medical loss ratios were at about 94% and that was thought to be to low at the time. 75% is ridiculous. The waivers are gifts to insurance companies.
Reply

Re: Herman Cain Announces Run For White House

Ronnie P. ·
The Democrats already have a viable candidate, Hillary Clinton
Reply

Re: Repubs bail out federal spending

Mr.Dittohead ·
then the Repubs must be irreparably incompetent. Clinton raised taxes which resulted in increased federal revenues which allowed the annual deficit to fall to zero. During the debate for extending the BushIIe tax cuts, the Repubs acknowledged that continuing the lower rate would cost the fedgov about $80billion/year. You cant have it both ways. You're wrong, I'm right.
Reply

Re: Repubs bail out federal spending

teyates ·
You are delusional. Clinton only "balanced" the budget by shifting money around and borrowing from SS. There was no excess of money in the treasury and when the funds were placed back in their appropriate place the deficit looked even worse. Like most liberals you think that you can tax your way to proseperity (which I guess if you can sit on your lazy azz waiting for the check to come in and not pay any taxes on it, you probably could), but most people would agree that this is like a man...
Reply

Re: Repubs bail out federal spending

Mr.Dittohead ·
BushIIe used the same accounting rules as Clinton, and his deficits and accumulated debt were much higher, probably because BushIIe had the backing of a Repub Congress which could literally not spend money fast enough.
Reply

Re: why Obama will be re-Elected

upsidedehead ·
Others may well vote for him because they are tired of biased tirades such as the mis-attributed mess posted above. The righties just can't stand it that Obama seems headed for a second term. The same situation occurred when Clinton was on HIS way to a second term and the GOP was struggling to find someone, anyone, with a chance to defeat him. The aging and polemically uncomfortable Bob Dole was the best they could do. The righties, so far as the next election is concerned, don't have anyone...
Reply

Re: Weiner photo

b50m ·
To add, the man is an idiot if he did do it. This is his wife of ONE year, aide to Hillary Clinton. Huma Abedin Vogue Photo Shoot, Hillary Clinton Top Aide (Photos)
Reply

Re: Weiner photo

dark dreamer ·
Originally Posted by b50m: To add, the man is an idiot if he did do it. This is his wife of ONE year, aide to Hillary Clinton. Huma Abedin Vogue Photo Shoot, Hillary Clinton Top Aide (Photos) I agree. With a wife like that, If he did it he must be an idiot!
Reply

Re: why Obama will be re-Elected

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by upsidedehead: The righties just can't stand it that Obama seems headed for a second term. The same situation occurred when Clinton was on HIS way to a second term and the GOP was struggling to find someone, anyone, with a chance to defeat him. The aging and polemically uncomfortable Bob Dole was the best they could do. The righties, so far as the next election is concerned, don't have anyone approaching Dole's experience and stature except maybe Jon Huntsman, and since...
Reply

Re: Obama Appeals for Patience on Economy After Dismal Jobs Report

skippy delepepper ·
You know where all that job loss started was with Clinton. Yes Mr. Pants on the ground himself. Clinton opened the door to giving away our technology to our Enemy, yes enemy. The Chinese, Russia and the Muslim nations will be our biggest threats in the up coming years. Clinton opened the door to the destruction of our manufacturing in this country. Thank you Mr. Clinton for destroying our country. Yep 10 years sounds right. Now 20 and so on. Skippy
Reply

Re: 'Silver-Tongued' Lawyer Edwards Going to Jail

Winston Niles Rumfoord ·
Couldn't happen to a sleazier guy. Except maybe Bill Clinton.
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

dogsoldier0513 ·
Saying B.O. is 'too consevative' is like saying Hilary Clinton is a 'raving beauty'. It just ain't so......
Reply

Re: 'Silver-Tongued' Lawyer Edwards Going to Jail

O No! ·
Once again, there are enough scandals on BOTH sides that I would think none of you "so's your old man" types would dare bring any of them up. From Nixon to Gingrich, from Clinton to Edwards, and both parties go further back than any of them. Sex scandals, money scandals, you name it. Neither party is blameless, and the less said about ANY of them, the better. That way we'll have more time to discuss things that are RELEVANT to what is going on in our country and the world.
Reply

Re: Palin explains Paul Revere

skippy delepepper ·
Originally Posted by dogsoldier0513: Saying B.O. is 'too consevative' is like saying Hilary Clinton is a 'raving beauty'. It just ain't so...... Ouch! LOL Skippy
Reply

Re: Let's keep our eye on the ball..

LE89 ·
Clinton was impeached.
Reply

Re: Let's keep our eye on the ball..

The Nagel ·
Originally Posted by LE89: Clinton was impeached. Aye.. but he wasn't convicted by the senate, which means he wasn't removed from office... most people use 'impeach' to mean 'thrown out' and most never realize it's a two step process.
Reply

Re: Let's keep our eye on the ball..

GridLockd ·
Agreed Nagel. Although I fail to see the point of impeachment without removal from office. Nonetheless, I believe everyone understands what I am getting at. In my eyes the Clinton scenario is a much worse offense than that of Congressman Weiner. Whether or not in the opinion of the people his "scandal" makes him unable to perform his duties as a congressman is a debate for another day. My point is that I feel that the situation has been blown out of proportion.
Reply

Re: Let's keep our eye on the ball..

The Propagandist ·
Originally Posted by GridLockd: Agreed Nagel. Although I fail to see the point of impeachment without removal from office. Nonetheless, I believe everyone understands what I am getting at. In my eyes the Clinton scenario is a much worse offense than that of Congressman Weiner. Whether or not in the opinion of the people his "scandal" makes him unable to perform his duties as a congressman is a debate for another day. My point is that I feel that the situation has been blown out of...
Reply

Re: A little refresher on some of the seamier

8I ·
Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, et al are all typical, and not in a good way. The left and the right harbor idealistic partisan fantasies about these presidents. Realistically, they were the SSDD, lather, rinse, repeat. I realize objectivity isn't very popular, but how is it that partisan hacks can look at the legacy of one admin and totally ignore applying the same standards to the other? Politics has evolved into a religion, the faithful believe their own story propagated by their cult. And...
Reply

Re: A little refresher on some of the seamier

beternU ·
It was my impression that the subject matter of this thread was the Reagan-era Iran_Contra scandal. Ollie North was a part of that; thus it is legitimate to discuss his involvement. But where, in any of this, does Bill Clinton fit in? I will answer that myself. It is a common fallacy on the part of those who attempt to rationalize the misbehavour of their favorites (e.g. Reagan) to believe that such an effort is served by the diversionary measure of calling attention to the failures or...
Reply

Re: A little refresher on some of the seamier

The Incriminator ·
The only places bull clodton EVER fit in was monica, genifer, sally, paula, kathleen, eleanor, juanita, dee dee, susan, and buddy the dog.
Reply

Re: Obama urges Americans to buy American made cars...

bamacarl ·
Must have me confused for someone else? If your dad was a union organizer in the sixties, I maybe a little older than you. Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair by a majority repub house.
Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×