Skip to main content

John Ensign, member of "The Family" of "C Street" fame and admitted adulterer, now faces FBI investigation for possible misuse of campaign funds and violation of lobbying laws.

Ensign, predictability, denies all.

I saw Ensign being interviewed by Rick Sanchez on CNN and he (Ensign) was the consummate weasel, giving no answers and steadfastly barfing up the old stale "I have many more important things to do in serving the people of my state" run-around. I predict the varmint will be indicted and found guilty!

This truly is one "tattered Ensign"!

http://voices.washingtonpost.c...ensign.html?wprss=44

http://www.fresnobee.com/384/story/1787916.html
Last edited {1}
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
bitternU, If this guy was a Dem, there would not have been even a peep issuing form your rancorous mouth. That having been said, he is obviously a creep and truly belongs in the Dimocrat party.


Oh? And will you clean up the GOP by consigning all Republican CREEPS to them? Like Mark Sanford, the Appalachian Trailsman? Or Chip Pickering, anothter C Street "Family" member and adulterer? Is that the way the GOP stays "pure"? Seems like the party is well overdue to assign Senator Larry "Wide Stance" Craig to the other side of the aisle. How's that for "rancorous"?
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
bitternU, If this guy was a Dem, there would not have been even a peep issuing form your rancorous mouth. That having been said, he is obviously a creep and truly belongs in the Dimocrat party.


Oh? And will you clean up the GOP by consigning all Republican CREEPS to them? Like Mark Sanford, the Appalachian Trailsman? Or Chip Pickering, anothter C Street "Family" member and adulterer? Is that the way the GOP stays "pure"? Seems like the party is well overdue to assign Senator Larry "Wide Stance" Craig to the other side of the aisle. How's that for "rancorous"?


How about we clean them all up...and out, regardless of the D or R after their name.
quote:
Originally posted by Renegade Nation:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
bitternU, If this guy was a Dem, there would not have been even a peep issuing form your rancorous mouth. That having been said, he is obviously a creep and truly belongs in the Dimocrat party.


Oh? And will you clean up the GOP by consigning all Republican CREEPS to them? Like Mark Sanford, the Appalachian Trailsman? Or Chip Pickering, anothter C Street "Family" member and adulterer? Is that the way the GOP stays "pure"? Seems like the party is well overdue to assign Senator Larry "Wide Stance" Craig to the other side of the aisle. How's that for "rancorous"?


How about we clean them all up...and out, regardless of the D or R after their name.


Obviously bitter hasn't been to a TEA Party event. Most people, myself included, aren't happy with the Republicans either.
quote:
Originally posted by ferrellj:
quote:
Originally posted by Renegade Nation:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
bitternU, If this guy was a Dem, there would not have been even a peep issuing form your rancorous mouth. That having been said, he is obviously a creep and truly belongs in the Dimocrat party.


Oh? And will you clean up the GOP by consigning all Republican CREEPS to them? Like Mark Sanford, the Appalachian Trailsman? Or Chip Pickering, anothter C Street "Family" member and adulterer? Is that the way the GOP stays "pure"? Seems like the party is well overdue to assign Senator Larry "Wide Stance" Craig to the other side of the aisle. How's that for "rancorous"?


How about we clean them all up...and out, regardless of the D or R after their name.


Obviously bitter hasn't been to a TEA Party event. Most people, myself included, aren't happy with the Republicans either.


Hey, it was marksw who brought up the party stuff, not me. I posted the truth about Ensign. I mentioned nothing about his party until that was introduced into the discussion by marksw, so nail HIM for the party stuff if you want to lash out that way. I can't help it if the lying and adulterous Ensign is a member of the GOP or a righteous member of the C Street "Family.".
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Hey, it was marksw who brought up the party stuff, not me. I posted the truth about Ensign. I mentioned nothing about his party until that was introduced into the discussion by marksw, so nail HIM for the party stuff if you want to lash out that way. I can't help it if the lying and adulterous Ensign is a member of the GOP or a righteous member of the C Street "Family.".


No, *I* brought up the point that you probably only started this thread because Ensign was a Republican. No you can't help the situations surrounding Ensign's failings or his party, the most obvious of the failings is that he is in the wrong party, but you can control your compulsion to troll around looking for dirt on anyone to the right of Stalin. I guess that is pretty far out there on the scale of probabilities though...

No, you did not bring up any party affiliation, but the thing is I would have known by the poster's name which party he belonged to if I didn't already know. Indeed I was fairly sure before I read his name which party he belonged to. I'm not prescient, so how is that possible? I think the answer is that the poster is 'pedantically predictable'. Wink
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Hey, it was marksw who brought up the party stuff, not me. I posted the truth about Ensign. I mentioned nothing about his party until that was introduced into the discussion by marksw, so nail HIM for the party stuff if you want to lash out that way. I can't help it if the lying and adulterous Ensign is a member of the GOP or a righteous member of the C Street "Family.".


No, *I* brought up the point that you probably only started this thread because Ensign was a Republican. No you can't help the situations surrounding Ensign's failings or his party, the most obvious of the failings is that he is in the wrong party, but you can control your compulsion to troll around looking for dirt on anyone to the right of Stalin. I guess that is pretty far out there on the scale of probabilities though...

No, you did not bring up any party affiliation, but the thing is I would have known by the poster's name which party he belonged to if I didn't already know. Indeed I was fairly sure before I read his name which party he belonged to. I'm not prescient, so how is that possible? I think the answer is that the poster is 'pedantically predictable'. Wink


Hey, I can't help it if Ensign is a Republican and happened to be interviewed on CNN the day I posted the initial entry in this string. I did not recruit the adulterous, lying hypocritical lecher into the GOP. Also, I had nothing to do with Mark Sanford's C Street affiliation, nor with Chip Pickering's. I can't help it if the C Street dirtbags involved in extramarital affairs are all Republicans. If some of the C Street "Family" members are less than loyal to the family values they allege to believe in, that ain't my fault. I did not wave a liberal magic wand and transform them into the hypocrites they have shown themselves to be.

Go find you a D (for Democrat?) Street house somewhere, loaded up with self-righteous leftist fundamentalist hypocrites, if you can, and then form up your own comments on that. I won't criticize that if you do, but you gotta find 'em first.
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Hey, it was marksw who brought up the party stuff, not me. I posted the truth about Ensign. I mentioned nothing about his party until that was introduced into the discussion by marksw, so nail HIM for the party stuff if you want to lash out that way. I can't help it if the lying and adulterous Ensign is a member of the GOP or a righteous member of the C Street "Family.".


No, *I* brought up the point that you probably only started this thread because Ensign was a Republican. No you can't help the situations surrounding Ensign's failings or his party, the most obvious of the failings is that he is in the wrong party, but you can control your compulsion to troll around looking for dirt on anyone to the right of Stalin. I guess that is pretty far out there on the scale of probabilities though...

No, you did not bring up any party affiliation, but the thing is I would have known by the poster's name which party he belonged to if I didn't already know. Indeed I was fairly sure before I read his name which party he belonged to. I'm not prescient, so how is that possible? I think the answer is that the poster is 'pedantically predictable'. Wink


Hey, I can't help it if Ensign is a Republican and happened to be interviewed on CNN the day I posted the initial entry in this string. I did not recruit the adulterous, lying hypocritical lecher into the GOP. Also, I had nothing to do with Mark Sanford's C Street affiliation, nor with Chip Pickering's. I can't help it if the C Street dirtbags involved in extramarital affairs are all Republicans. If some of the C Street "Family" members are less than loyal to the family values they allege to believe in, that ain't my fault. I did not wave a liberal magic wand and transform them into the hypocrites they have shown themselves to be.

Go find you a D (for Democrat?) Street house somewhere, loaded up with self-righteous leftist fundamentalist hypocrites, if you can, and then form up your own comments on that. I won't criticize that if you do, but you gotta find 'em first.


Again, pedantically predictable.
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Hey, it was marksw who brought up the party stuff, not me. I posted the truth about Ensign. I mentioned nothing about his party until that was introduced into the discussion by marksw, so nail HIM for the party stuff if you want to lash out that way. I can't help it if the lying and adulterous Ensign is a member of the GOP or a righteous member of the C Street "Family.".


No, *I* brought up the point that you probably only started this thread because Ensign was a Republican. No you can't help the situations surrounding Ensign's failings or his party, the most obvious of the failings is that he is in the wrong party, but you can control your compulsion to troll around looking for dirt on anyone to the right of Stalin. I guess that is pretty far out there on the scale of probabilities though...

No, you did not bring up any party affiliation, but the thing is I would have known by the poster's name which party he belonged to if I didn't already know. Indeed I was fairly sure before I read his name which party he belonged to. I'm not prescient, so how is that possible? I think the answer is that the poster is 'pedantically predictable'. Wink


Hey, I can't help it if Ensign is a Republican and happened to be interviewed on CNN the day I posted the initial entry in this string. I did not recruit the adulterous, lying hypocritical lecher into the GOP. Also, I had nothing to do with Mark Sanford's C Street affiliation, nor with Chip Pickering's. I can't help it if the C Street dirtbags involved in extramarital affairs are all Republicans. If some of the C Street "Family" members are less than loyal to the family values they allege to believe in, that ain't my fault. I did not wave a liberal magic wand and transform them into the hypocrites they have shown themselves to be.

Go find you a D (for Democrat?) Street house somewhere, loaded up with self-righteous leftist fundamentalist hypocrites, if you can, and then form up your own comments on that. I won't criticize that if you do, but you gotta find 'em first.


Again, pedantically predictable.


Again, in your case, terse and weak.
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Hey, it was marksw who brought up the party stuff, not me. I posted the truth about Ensign. I mentioned nothing about his party until that was introduced into the discussion by marksw, so nail HIM for the party stuff if you want to lash out that way. I can't help it if the lying and adulterous Ensign is a member of the GOP or a righteous member of the C Street "Family.".


No, *I* brought up the point that you probably only started this thread because Ensign was a Republican. No you can't help the situations surrounding Ensign's failings or his party, the most obvious of the failings is that he is in the wrong party, but you can control your compulsion to troll around looking for dirt on anyone to the right of Stalin. I guess that is pretty far out there on the scale of probabilities though...

No, you did not bring up any party affiliation, but the thing is I would have known by the poster's name which party he belonged to if I didn't already know. Indeed I was fairly sure before I read his name which party he belonged to. I'm not prescient, so how is that possible? I think the answer is that the poster is 'pedantically predictable'. Wink


Hey, I can't help it if Ensign is a Republican and happened to be interviewed on CNN the day I posted the initial entry in this string. I did not recruit the adulterous, lying hypocritical lecher into the GOP. Also, I had nothing to do with Mark Sanford's C Street affiliation, nor with Chip Pickering's. I can't help it if the C Street dirtbags involved in extramarital affairs are all Republicans. If some of the C Street "Family" members are less than loyal to the family values they allege to believe in, that ain't my fault. I did not wave a liberal magic wand and transform them into the hypocrites they have shown themselves to be.

Go find you a D (for Democrat?) Street house somewhere, loaded up with self-righteous leftist fundamentalist hypocrites, if you can, and then form up your own comments on that. I won't criticize that if you do, but you gotta find 'em first.


You keep you ideals quiet when it comes to the real scum bag John Edwards. He was fooling around on the campaign trail and while his wife was fighting cancer.
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Hey, it was marksw who brought up the party stuff, not me. I posted the truth about Ensign. I mentioned nothing about his party until that was introduced into the discussion by marksw, so nail HIM for the party stuff if you want to lash out that way. I can't help it if the lying and adulterous Ensign is a member of the GOP or a righteous member of the C Street "Family.".


No, *I* brought up the point that you probably only started this thread because Ensign was a Republican. No you can't help the situations surrounding Ensign's failings or his party, the most obvious of the failings is that he is in the wrong party, but you can control your compulsion to troll around looking for dirt on anyone to the right of Stalin. I guess that is pretty far out there on the scale of probabilities though...

No, you did not bring up any party affiliation, but the thing is I would have known by the poster's name which party he belonged to if I didn't already know. Indeed I was fairly sure before I read his name which party he belonged to. I'm not prescient, so how is that possible? I think the answer is that the poster is 'pedantically predictable'. Wink


Hey, I can't help it if Ensign is a Republican and happened to be interviewed on CNN the day I posted the initial entry in this string. I did not recruit the adulterous, lying hypocritical lecher into the GOP. Also, I had nothing to do with Mark Sanford's C Street affiliation, nor with Chip Pickering's. I can't help it if the C Street dirtbags involved in extramarital affairs are all Republicans. If some of the C Street "Family" members are less than loyal to the family values they allege to believe in, that ain't my fault. I did not wave a liberal magic wand and transform them into the hypocrites they have shown themselves to be.

Go find you a D (for Democrat?) Street house somewhere, loaded up with self-righteous leftist fundamentalist hypocrites, if you can, and then form up your own comments on that. I won't criticize that if you do, but you gotta find 'em first.


Again, pedantically predictable.


Again, in your case, terse and weak.


Okay, okay, okay... if you insist... you might want to read up on the recent exploits of America's newest amateur porn star! The man who was to be the "next Kennedy", The Silky Pony himself, JOHN EDWARDS! The man that was the "golden boy" of the Democrat party, the righteous crusader for the "little guy", that man has turned out to be nothing more than a worthless scumbag... who could have guessed? Oh wait, did I mention that beternU seems to have forgotten this sack of crap in a suit even exists... Just IMAGINE the the invective the bitter one would have hurled had John "pretty boy" Edwards the 'misfortune' of having an "R" after his name. Juuuust imagine....

Bid To Quash John Edwards Sex Tape
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Hey, it was marksw who brought up the party stuff, not me. I posted the truth about Ensign. I mentioned nothing about his party until that was introduced into the discussion by marksw, so nail HIM for the party stuff if you want to lash out that way. I can't help it if the lying and adulterous Ensign is a member of the GOP or a righteous member of the C Street "Family.".


No, *I* brought up the point that you probably only started this thread because Ensign was a Republican. No you can't help the situations surrounding Ensign's failings or his party, the most obvious of the failings is that he is in the wrong party, but you can control your compulsion to troll around looking for dirt on anyone to the right of Stalin. I guess that is pretty far out there on the scale of probabilities though...

No, you did not bring up any party affiliation, but the thing is I would have known by the poster's name which party he belonged to if I didn't already know. Indeed I was fairly sure before I read his name which party he belonged to. I'm not prescient, so how is that possible? I think the answer is that the poster is 'pedantically predictable'. Wink


Hey, I can't help it if Ensign is a Republican and happened to be interviewed on CNN the day I posted the initial entry in this string. I did not recruit the adulterous, lying hypocritical lecher into the GOP. Also, I had nothing to do with Mark Sanford's C Street affiliation, nor with Chip Pickering's. I can't help it if the C Street dirtbags involved in extramarital affairs are all Republicans. If some of the C Street "Family" members are less than loyal to the family values they allege to believe in, that ain't my fault. I did not wave a liberal magic wand and transform them into the hypocrites they have shown themselves to be.

Go find you a D (for Democrat?) Street house somewhere, loaded up with self-righteous leftist fundamentalist hypocrites, if you can, and then form up your own comments on that. I won't criticize that if you do, but you gotta find 'em first.


Again, pedantically predictable.


Again, in your case, terse and weak.


Okay, okay, okay... if you insist... you might want to read up on the recent exploits of America's newest amateur porn star! The man who was to be the "next Kennedy", The Silky Pony himself, JOHN EDWARDS! The man that was the "golden boy" of the Democrat party, the righteous crusader for the "little guy", that man has turned out to be nothing more than a worthless scumbag... who could have guessed? Oh wait, did I mention that beternU seems to have forgotten this sack of crap in a suit even exists... Just IMAGINE the the invective the bitter one would have hurled had John "pretty boy" Edwards the 'misfortune' of having an "R" after his name. Juuuust imagine....

Bid To Quash John Edwards Sex Tape


John Edwards holds no political office and likely will never again hold one.

John Ensign is currently serving as a United States Senator from the State of Nevada.

I could have posted stuff up here about the illegitmmate child of President Grover Cleveland, but that would have nothing to do with any currently politically viable figure.

Edwards' conduct was deplorable and it has been fully publicized in the media. What I posted on Ensign was very recent and timely news about the reported FBI investigation

Post on persons of your choice, and I will post on persons of my choice. This is an open forum.
Last edited by beternU
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
quote:
Originally posted by marksw59:

Okay, okay, okay... if you insist... you might want to read up on the recent exploits of America's newest amateur porn star! The man who was to be the "next Kennedy", The Silky Pony himself, JOHN EDWARDS! The man that was the "golden boy" of the Democrat party, the righteous crusader for the "little guy", that man has turned out to be nothing more than a worthless scumbag... who could have guessed? Oh wait, did I mention that beternU seems to have forgotten this sack of crap in a suit even exists... Just IMAGINE the the invective the bitter one would have hurled had John "pretty boy" Edwards the 'misfortune' of having an "R" after his name. Juuuust imagine....

Bid To Quash John Edwards Sex Tape


John Edwards holds no political office and likely will never again hold one.

John Ensign is currently serving as a United States Senator from the State of Nevada.

I could have posted stuff up here about the illegitmmate child of President Grover Cleveland, but that would have nothing to do with any currently politically viable figure.

Edwards' conduct was deplorable and it has been fully publicized in the media. What I posted on Ensign was very recent and timely news about the reported FBI investigation

Post on persons of your choice, and I will post on persons of my choice. This is an open forum.


How incredibly weak. Weak, weak, weak. Your partisan hack-ness is shinning through, thanks for making my point.
Also, notice that you missed the word 'illegitimate' when you edited for the more obvious spelling error, I know how you hate that. Wink

Add Reply


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×