Skip to main content

Let me repeat it here, since my thread seems to have disappeared. It must have hurt a liberal's feelings, which is easy to do when you post facts and truth to them.  NO ONE at the Capitol protest on 1/6/2021 has been charged with insurrection.


Well, the Jan. 6 committee has produced its long-awaited report. In a surprise move, the committee referred former President Donald Trump for criminal prosecution, accusing him of inciting insurrection, among other crimes.

In fairness, Jan. 6, 2021, was the day that Trump announced he would open our southern border and allow nearly 5 million unvetted illegal immigrants into our country, whereupon they would be flown to various cities around the U.S. and given full access to all our welfare programs.

Obviously, this constitutes insurrectionary behavior. The committee had no choice but to demand criminal charges.

LATE BULLETIN: It was NOT the former president who did this, but the current president, Joe Biden. In another development, it turns out that engineering a foreign invasion of our country has been redefined as a "humanitarian mission."

When will this "humanitarian mission" end? Apparently, never -- not until all 7 billion humans living in places less luxe than America have moved here, at which point America won't be so hot anymore, so no one will want to come.

Thus, The New York Times quoted Jennifer Quigley, of Human Rights First, saying of our intervention in Afghanistan: "We can't claim mission accomplished. There are still too many vulnerable people abroad."

After spending billions of dollars trying to build a semblance of civil society in that stone-age culture, evidently now we're supposed to open our doors to everyone who lives there. Even granting that absurd notion, I can't help but notice that Quigley seamlessly shifted from "Afghanistan" to "people abroad."

So we have to take in every "vulnerable" person who doesn't already live in the U.S.? Is there any other way to interpret her statement?

CNN demands that we fly Afghans here directly, not content to wait for these future Nobel Prize-winners to take the air-land route from Afghanistan through Central America into our country -- which they are also doing.

For the last few weeks, CNN has aired a story almost every hour about how Afghans "risked their lives" to save Americans, so now we owe them permanent residency in our country. It's unclear whom we were ever fighting, inasmuch as everyone in the country seems to have been a "translator."

CNN hosts triumphantly produced a letter by "retired diplomats," warning that if the U.S. doesn't "support its allies" [by allowing them to move here], "in the future our allies will be less likely to support the U.S. missions." (And then who will teach third-worlders about feminism, gays and George Floyd?)

Former U.S. Marine Paul Whelan must be relieved to hear liberals admit that how we treat those who put their lives on the line for our country will determine how we are willing to do so in the future. Whelan, you'll recall, is rotting in a Russian prison, because a gay Women's National Basketball Association star (but I repeat myself) took precedence over him in a prisoner trade. We're looking for a few good men. Anybody? Anybody?

We've already taken in 76,000 Afghans since Biden's smooth withdrawal last year. (Please, God, tell me we rescued the Afghans who helped paint the George Floyd mural.)

And look at what a blessing they've been!

Mohammad Haroon Imaad was among the first batch of beloved Afghan "translators" brought to America last year. He was still living on the Fort McCoy military base in Wisconsin when he was charged with beating and choking his wife. She explained that he beat her all the time back in Afghanistan, once blinding her in both eyes.

Obviously, the Imaad household is going to be a real boon to our country. Yeah, we're gonna have to raise the Social Security retirement age and start means-testing, but on the bright side, we've provided housing to Mrs. Imaad and paid for her astronomically expensive eye operations.

On the very same military base, another cherished Afghan ally, Bahrullah Noori, committed multiple forcible sexual assaults on children within weeks of arriving. Other Afghans flown to Fort McCoy showed up with child brides and multiple wives.

Just weeks after the Afghan-of-the-Month competition at Fort McCoy, another Afghan on our "must-have" list, Zabihullah Mohmand, was accused of raping a woman in Missoula, Montana. How long had he been here? A week? But the good news is, Mohmand was fully vetted by our government, according to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas. If you can't trust those guys ...

In response, the media promptly stopped reporting those stories. Perhaps a better idea would be for CNN to have a word with the 76,000 "translators" already deposited on our s****s. Hey, guys! Remember, for the next few months, NO RAPING!

Again, these were the most-favored Afghans, the ones who qualified for the first round of emergency admissions. And they just keep coming.

Now, that's what most people call an "insurrection."

Desperation met stupidity on the corner of bad luck and despair, and the democratic party was born.

Last edited by giftedamateur
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

they bring or allow people that are 20 maybe 30 years behind socially.  People that think it is okay to beat their spouse, etc.  most don't speak our language. Some getting more money than someone who paid into social security for over 40 years.  Some say they risked their life, what about our troops that risk their life. What is their country doing for them?  All this money sent to other countries, who is paying it back?  Cut off money to allies and find out they aren't our allies.   

the hill is a democrat rag. New flash, media lies.

immigrants are in belief of social norms we left behind 20 plus years ago. I attended High school with many "illegals".  They were responsible for a majority of challenges at school. Plus they took away from learning of others.  since you mentioned muslims. the still hold the belief that women are not equal.

on Griner, I felt that Fogel (a 61 year old teacher) should have been brought back first. He was convicted earlier than Griner, and for 5 years longer sentence. On top of that a 61 year old is less suitable to withstand a Russia prison than an in shape athlete.  Add I am sure the three are not only ones held in Russia prisons. Lastly I thought we didn't negotiate with terrorist. Who will be the next American held wrongly? Travel at your own risk.

Why the US was able to bring home Brittney Griner but not Paul Whelan

The Hill! Ha! Griner hates the US and went willingly to Russia where Griner broke the law. I know why Griner was brought back sooner and I don't need a left wing lying rag like the Hill to spin it. Griner checked all the dem boxes. No one has any idea of Griner's real gender, although Griner claims to be female and GAY, and we can see Griner is black. Griner is the stuff that liberals LOVE.

Add Reply


Untitled Document
Link copied to your clipboard.