Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by budsfarm:
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:

 

 you chose to make up your facts.. .'so, in other words they didn't vote'. 

 

yep, stupid is as stupid does.. thanks for admitting it.

 

+++

 

What facts did I make up?  All I did was repeat what you said.  When it comes to stupidity, got to consider the source.

 

 

_______

you can't be so stupid as to not recognize your own words, can you?

i included the 'facts' you made up, in  my post.. i'm so sorry you don't recognize them...

 

+++

 

My "facts" came from you.

 

"you can't be so stupid as to not recognize your own words, can you?"

 

Last edited by budsfarm
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by mad American:
You said they did not enter polling place.

______

ok, so they vote somewhere else.. or voted absentee... now what? this is entering the realm of ridiculous.... unless you have something productive to add.. i'm about done with your circular argument.

 

+++

 

Unless you care to back up your "facts"....

 

PS.  I could care less if they voted or not.

 

What was their legal authority and who assigned them?

 

Last edited by budsfarm
Originally Posted by budsfarm:
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by mad American:
You said they did not enter polling place.

______

ok, so they vote somewhere else.. or voted absentee... now what? this is entering the realm of ridiculous.... unless you have something productive to add.. i'm about done with your circular argument.

 

+++

 

Unless you care to back up your "facts"....

 

________________

i will.. right after you back your claims of 'they didn't vote'... i'll be waiting.

Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by budsfarm:
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by mad American:
You said they did not enter polling place.

______

ok, so they vote somewhere else.. or voted absentee... now what? this is entering the realm of ridiculous.... unless you have something productive to add.. i'm about done with your circular argument.

 

+++

 

Unless you care to back up your "facts"....

 

________________

i will.. right after you back your claims of 'they didn't vote'... i'll be waiting.

 

+++

 

See above.

 

Originally Posted by Crash.Override:

so, you have a link showing they never voted? would you post it, please?

i'd love to hear how 'not entering a polling place' means you didn't vote.. again, i'm waiting.  (you do know there's more than one polling place. and more than one way to vote, right?)

 

+++

 

On your way to the last question, mind answering the following you neglected"

 

"They were assigned a polling place different from their own so as to not cause interruptions."

 

How did that work out?

 

"they were there to ensure minority voter rights"

 

And how and by what legal authority were they expected to do that?

 

And to who?  Who was the threat?

 

 "they were assigned"

 

Tell me again who assigned them.

 

And did they vote?  You've a link to that of course.

 

"And did they vote?"  Sounds much like a question to you from me.  I'm satisfied with your answers.  All plausible, but the "fact" is, you really don't know and I really don't care.  Just that according to you, they weren't at their polling place and we have the Black Panthers word on it, right?

 

Guess the onus is on you to provide the remaining answers to questions regarding your other "facts."

 

See y'all tomorrow.

look.. your first claim was 'So in other words, they didn't vote.'

my reply was 'i'll play your silly game'... which is obviously what you intended to do.. now, you've gone in circles.. questioning my answer to your asinine statement.... now, you want me to prove my statement, with regards to your claim... i'll be glad to.. as soon as you prove your statement to be true. as soon as you prove those guys didn't vote.. i'll prove everything in my statement... 

now, we both know NEITHER statement can be proven true.. i'll default to 'you  made your statement up' and now, you're just 'trolling' until one of us gives up.. good night... thanks for the entertainment. i'll take your posts with a grain of salt, from now on.. you may just be 'trolling' again.

Jt, apparently you didn't read it this time, probably because, as I stated, you knew what it was all about from the first post. You should have read it this time too. BTW, what happened to me "dreaming it up"? LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!

 

As you stated in your first post, shoot out at two precincts. I assumed you meant two police precincts. Later posts (15 later) identified some voter intimidation.

As you stated in your first post, shoot out at two precincts. I assumed you meant two police precincts. Later posts (15 later) identified some voter intimidation.

------------------------------------------------------

 Sorry if you can't follow simple rational (conversations) posts. Even when you go off the rails and start up about charter schools, on a thread that has nothing to do with them (and claim you know about them, then admit/show you have no idea what you're rambling on about), others manage to keep up.

Last edited by Bestworking

Jt mutters:

 I assumed you meant two police precincts.

 

 according to Huffington Post, sent a tweet indicating that a confidential informant had warned that the gang had planned to “storm” two precincts and “shoot it out” with cops inside.

 

You assumed I meant? The words written in the article and the title of the thread didn't give you a clue? LOL!!

Last edited by Bestworking

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×