Skip to main content

quote:
Prosecutors say officers fabricated witness statements, falsified reports and planted a gun in an attempt to make it appear the shootings were justified.]Prosecutors say officers fabricated witness statements, falsified reports and planted a gun in an attempt to make it appear the shootings were justified.



quote:
So far, five former New Orleans police officers have pleaded guilty to lesser charges of helping cover up the shootings on the Danziger Bridge and await sentencing.


http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=11153219
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by WH:
What is your point with all the links? Do you think posting what good cops do somehow excuses the bad cops in louisiana?

Contrary to your thinking , Iappreciate good cops.


Contrary to your thinking WH, I and many others know you are an immature liar.

Remind us once more how appreciative you were of the LEO’s, especially the female, who took on the Ft. Hood shooter. You singlehandedly closed that thread, one of you many similar accomplishments.

Am I bullying you again?
quote:
Originally posted by budsfarm:
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
What is your point with all the links? Do you think posting what good cops do somehow excuses the bad cops in louisiana?

Contrary to your thinking , Iappreciate good cops.


Contrary to your thinking WH, I and many others know you are an immature liar.

Remind us once more how appreciative you were of the LEO’s, especially the female, who took on the Ft. Hood shooter. You singlehandedly closed that thread, one of you many similar accomplishments.

Am I bullying you again?


Sry dickhead...you are not capable of bullying me!
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
What is your point with all the links? Do you think posting what good cops do somehow excuses the bad cops in louisiana?

Contrary to your thinking , Iappreciate good cops.


Just posting examples of what the good ones are. Free country. I am as free to post good cops as you are bad cops. I don't condone the actions of the few but I stand behind the good ones. Its no secret NOPD has a ton of baggage.
quote:
Originally posted by ferrellj:
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
What is your point with all the links? Do you think posting what good cops do somehow excuses the bad cops in louisiana?

Contrary to your thinking , Iappreciate good cops.


Contrary to my thinking too. I'm guessing you're a loser that's had his run-ins with the law.


Just shows how wrong you can be.
quote:
Originally posted by wright35633:
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
What is your point with all the links? Do you think posting what good cops do somehow excuses the bad cops in louisiana?

Contrary to your thinking , Iappreciate good cops.


Just posting examples of what the good ones are. Free country. I am as free to post good cops as you are bad cops. I don't condone the actions of the few but I stand behind the good ones. Its no secret NOPD has a ton of baggage.


And just how are you tying the good ones in with N O ?

Your links have absolutely nothing to do with the subject of this thread. As you say...its a free country, now lets see if that works both ways.

I think you don't like my exposing the bad cops...thats all on you, it makes a statement about your credibility.
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
quote:
Originally posted by wright35633:
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
What is your point with all the links? Do you think posting what good cops do somehow excuses the bad cops in louisiana?

Contrary to your thinking , Iappreciate good cops.


Just posting examples of what the good ones are. Free country. I am as free to post good cops as you are bad cops. I don't condone the actions of the few but I stand behind the good ones. Its no secret NOPD has a ton of baggage.


And just how are you tying the good ones in with N O ?

Your links have absolutely nothing to do with the subject of this thread. As you say...its a free country, now lets see if that works both ways.

I think you don't like my exposing the bad cops...thats all on you, it makes a statement about your credibility.


You know nothing about me you miserable old man. I have never taken up for a corrupt police officer. I certainly didn't take up for these. I simply want people to see that for every bad act there are far more good ones. Don't ever speculate on my credibility again because you are fighting a losing battle. I was raised different than you I guess. It shows in your lack of respect.
I will submit a proposal to Wh that he, through the court system, attempt to renounce his privilege of police protection, wear a sign around his neck announcing his refusal of protection, and shout his insulting backwards a*sed rambling on a busy street corner somewhere. Then, after about ten minutes, ask him if his opinion of law enforcement has changed any.

As I have stated before, In the past I have had my differences with law enforcement, but MOST of the times I was in the wrong. But, I have never harbored any resentment to the proffesion as a whole. Particular individuals, certainly, but I STILL have respect for what they do and realize that their sacrifices are all that keeps this civilization a civilization.

So, for what its worth, people like Wright, Sassy, and Dogsoldier if you need it, I got cha back bro.
Last edited by leo
Well said, leo! I was just thinking along the same lines. There are bad apples in every profession....teachers who get involved with students, pharmacists who abuse drugs, etc. But WH apparently HATES the entire law enforcement community as a whole. We get it. He doesn't like them. Got to keep on beating that same old dead horse....for goodness sakes man, move on!!
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
I will submit a proposal to Wh that he, through the court system, attempt to renounce his privilege of police protection, wear a sign around his neck announcing his refusal of protection, and shout his insulting backwards a*sed rambling on a busy street corner somewhere. Then, after about ten minutes, ask him if his opinion of law enforcement has changed any.

As I have stated before, In the past I have had my differences with law enforcement, but MOST of the times I was in the wrong. But, I have never harbored any resentment to the proffesion as a whole. Particular individuals, certainly, but I STILL have respect for what they do and realize that their sacrifices are all that keeps this civilization a civilization.

So, for what its worth, people like Wright, Sassy, and Dogsoldier if you need it, I got cha back bro.



When have I displayed resentment to police as a whole?

SK and others including you make this statement but oit is simply not true. Without that you dont have an argument, so you must include this little bit of dishonesty to have a case.

Posting about a current news item about corrupt police is not taboo, even in your world where you think a lie about someone is acceptable.
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
quote:
Originally posted by leo:
I will submit a proposal to Wh that he, through the court system, attempt to renounce his privilege of police protection, wear a sign around his neck announcing his refusal of protection, and shout his insulting backwards a*sed rambling on a busy street corner somewhere. Then, after about ten minutes, ask him if his opinion of law enforcement has changed any.

As I have stated before, In the past I have had my differences with law enforcement, but MOST of the times I was in the wrong. But, I have never harbored any resentment to the proffesion as a whole. Particular individuals, certainly, but I STILL have respect for what they do and realize that their sacrifices are all that keeps this civilization a civilization.

So, for what its worth, people like Wright, Sassy, and Dogsoldier if you need it, I got cha back bro.



When have I displayed resentment to police as a whole?

SK and others including you make this statement but oit is simply not true. Without that you dont have an argument, so you must include this little bit of dishonesty to have a case.

Posting about a current news item about corrupt police is not taboo, even in your world where you think a lie about someone is acceptable.


Every post you've made on this forum related to law enforcement has been negative ones, showing resentment to the profession as a whole. Not to mention your assertions that every cop who disagrees with you, or posts an opposing video or viewpoint is corrupt.

For example, your condoning shooting an off duty deputy in the back of the head over a civil violation.

quote:

WH
Everybody Knows My Name

Posted 02 July 2010 04:32 AM



But then again. If the trespasser had been obeying the law as it is written, you know the one he is sworn to uphold, he would be alive today.

Every post I have made about law enforcement has not suited you. You may not like my views, but you can't disprove anything I have said.

I have never said anyone here is corrupt...I think you are a liar though.

I will post about what I want to. You would do well to keep that in mind. Your usual advantage of wearing a badge does give you the upper hand here.


I think the man that shot the off duty deputy was justified in his actions according to the law as written. The grand jury that heard the case felt he was justified too. You may not like the outcome, but it was correct according to the law as written.

You might want to think twice if you are considering going onto someones private property at midnight.
For once WH I will concede to your point. You have a right to post anything you want within reason. And yes it is dangerous to be on private property at night. I personally never argued against that. What I said was that if a private citizen wants to own a firearm he or she should be competent enough to not shoot through a door but make a precise tactical response to the threat at hand.
quote:
Originally posted by wright35633:
For once WH I will concede to your point. You have a right to post anything you want within reason. And yes it is dangerous to be on private property at night. I personally never argued against that. What I said was that if a private citizen wants to own a firearm he or she should be competent enough to not shoot through a door but make a precise tactical response to the threat at hand.



Our constitution gives us a right to bear arms, it gives no stipulations. What you suggest is a good idea but is it practical? How is an 80 year old woman supposed to make a 'precise tactical response'?

I feel the fault lies with the trespasser. We don't know all the details of that incident. I know I might go as far as to attempt to identify...if no response I would probably take protective action, even if it meant killing the intruder.


BTW...the shooter was retired from the same sheriff dept. as a reserve deputy. He had the training you speak of.
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
quote:
Originally posted by wright35633:
For once WH I will concede to your point. You have a right to post anything you want within reason. And yes it is dangerous to be on private property at night. I personally never argued against that. What I said was that if a private citizen wants to own a firearm he or she should be competent enough to not shoot through a door but make a precise tactical response to the threat at hand.



Our constitution gives us a right to bear arms, it gives no stipulations. What you suggest is a good idea but is it practical? How is an 80 year old woman supposed to make a 'precise tactical response'?

I feel the fault lies with the trespasser. We don't know all the details of that incident. I know I might go as far as to attempt to identify...if no response I would probably take protective action, even if it meant killing the intruder.


BTW...the shooter was retired from the same sheriff dept. as a reserve deputy. He had the training you speak of.


Just because he was retired from a sheriff's dept. doesn't mean he was well trained. Standing at a line once yearly and shooting a paper target hardly qualifies as trained. You are so big about calling people out when they post what they don't know and here you are doing it. I personally don't know what training he received but I hardly think the minimum standard is sufficient.
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
Every post I have made about law enforcement has not suited you. You may not like my views, but you can't disprove anything I have said.

I have never said anyone here is corrupt...I think you are a liar though.

I will post about what I want to. You would do well to keep that in mind. Your usual advantage of wearing a badge does give you the upper hand here.


I think the man that shot the off duty deputy was justified in his actions according to the law as written. The grand jury that heard the case felt he was justified too. You may not like the outcome, but it was correct according to the law as written.

You might want to think twice if you are considering going onto someones private property at midnight.


There is one of the fundamental differences between me and you. You think I'm a liar. I know you are.

Evidently you missed the part where the lawsuit against the land owner says that the deputy was shot in the back of the head. Not much of a menace that way.

I can see you as condoning backshooting an non threatening individual. It would suit your style to a tee.
quote:
Originally posted by wright35633:
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
quote:
Originally posted by wright35633:
For once WH I will concede to your point. You have a right to post anything you want within reason. And yes it is dangerous to be on private property at night. I personally never argued against that. What I said was that if a private citizen wants to own a firearm he or she should be competent enough to not shoot through a door but make a precise tactical response to the threat at hand.



Our constitution gives us a right to bear arms, it gives no stipulations. What you suggest is a good idea but is it practical? How is an 80 year old woman supposed to make a 'precise tactical response'?

I feel the fault lies with the trespasser. We don't know all the details of that incident. I know I might go as far as to attempt to identify...if no response I would probably take protective action, even if it meant killing the intruder.


BTW...the shooter was retired from the same sheriff dept. as a reserve deputy. He had the training you speak of.


Just because he was retired from a sheriff's dept. doesn't mean he was well trained. Standing at a line once yearly and shooting a paper target hardly qualifies as trained. You are so big about calling people out when they post what they don't know and here you are doing it. I personally don't know what training he received but I hardly think the minimum standard is sufficient.


Now YOU want to cut the retired cop down? Thats funny.
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
Every post I have made about law enforcement has not suited you. You may not like my views, but you can't disprove anything I have said.

I have never said anyone here is corrupt...I think you are a liar though.

I will post about what I want to. You would do well to keep that in mind. Your usual advantage of wearing a badge does give you the upper hand here.


I think the man that shot the off duty deputy was justified in his actions according to the law as written. The grand jury that heard the case felt he was justified too. You may not like the outcome, but it was correct according to the law as written.

You might want to think twice if you are considering going onto someones private property at midnight.


There is one of the fundamental differences between me and you. You think I'm a liar. I know you are.

Evidently you missed the part where the lawsuit against the land owner says that the deputy was shot in the back of the head. Not much of a menace that way.

I can see you as condoning backshooting an non threatening individual. It would suit your style to a tee.



The jury heard the evidence and acquitted...you on the other hand are veering from the truth again..but it is funny, do keep going.
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
quote:
Originally posted by Sassy Kims:
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
Every post I have made about law enforcement has not suited you. You may not like my views, but you can't disprove anything I have said.

I have never said anyone here is corrupt...I think you are a liar though.

I will post about what I want to. You would do well to keep that in mind. Your usual advantage of wearing a badge does give you the upper hand here.


I think the man that shot the off duty deputy was justified in his actions according to the law as written. The grand jury that heard the case felt he was justified too. You may not like the outcome, but it was correct according to the law as written.

You might want to think twice if you are considering going onto someones private property at midnight.


There is one of the fundamental differences between me and you. You think I'm a liar. I know you are.

Evidently you missed the part where the lawsuit against the land owner says that the deputy was shot in the back of the head. Not much of a menace that way.

I can see you as condoning backshooting an non threatening individual. It would suit your style to a tee.



The jury heard the evidence and acquitted...you on the other hand are veering from the truth again..but it is funny, do keep going.


You just can't help but be wrong, can you...

A grand jury failed to indict. Quite a bit of difference from that and a jury rendering an acquittal. Evidence can be presented to grand juries over and over again. I suspect you'll see this one represented.
Sassy,

How many times has this bozo said something about your use of the internet while on duty? He does not know you personally, he does not know what your job responsibilities are. But he does accuse you of not doing your job if you are on the internet on duty.

If he is such an advocate for 'good' cops, why is it that he attacks every cop on this forum every chance he gets? Why is it that he goes out of his way to find articles about officers that are not related to the shoals at all, unless he is purposely going out of his way to show officers in a negative light? Why does he never post articles about officers going above and beyond?

No need to answer, we all already know. WH can hide behind the internet all day long saying he has nothing against good cops, we all know he hates all police officers and does all he can to destroy the credibility of the entire profession.....

Jeepin'
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
quote:
Originally posted by wright35633:
quote:
Originally posted by WH:
quote:
Originally posted by wright35633:
For once WH I will concede to your point. You have a right to post anything you want within reason. And yes it is dangerous to be on private property at night. I personally never argued against that. What I said was that if a private citizen wants to own a firearm he or she should be competent enough to not shoot through a door but make a precise tactical response to the threat at hand.



Our constitution gives us a right to bear arms, it gives no stipulations. What you suggest is a good idea but is it practical? How is an 80 year old woman supposed to make a 'precise tactical response'?

I feel the fault lies with the trespasser. We don't know all the details of that incident. I know I might go as far as to attempt to identify...if no response I would probably take protective action, even if it meant killing the intruder.


BTW...the shooter was retired from the same sheriff dept. as a reserve deputy. He had the training you speak of.


Just because he was retired from a sheriff's dept. doesn't mean he was well trained. Standing at a line once yearly and shooting a paper target hardly qualifies as trained. You are so big about calling people out when they post what they don't know and here you are doing it. I personally don't know what training he received but I hardly think the minimum standard is sufficient.


Now YOU want to cut the retired cop down? Thats funny.


No one cut him down. You said he was trained. I said I think more than minimum training is required to be proficient. You need to quit making so many ASSumptions. Or maybe a 5 year old can read for you so you know what is being written.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×