The only people who take the story of Noah's Ark are children and retarded adults. The story is absurd on its face, and gets more absurd the more one looks into it.
I've read and heard all the apologetics, and they're all shyte.
One of the funny things is that, given the story is true, then hyper-evolution must have taken place for all those "kinds" to manifest themselves in the biodiversity that we see today. Yet, evolution is taboo to the FundTards.
What sort of unexamined FundTard must one be not to know that the story of the Flood came from the Babylonian mythology which preceded the Jewish one? The story of Creation, the Flood... all preceded in the Enuma Elish and the Epic of Gilgamesh. The story of Moses is way older than the Jewish Torah. Why do FundTards disregard the absolute lack of evidence of the Egyptian Captivity, yet discount the influence of the real Babylonian Captivity?
Because they prefer a mythology over any sort of history or reality. It is for that reason why a certain conversational intolerance is warranted, and why millions of young people, entitled to the liberty of their minds, have rejected their superstition.
Religion is cooked. It's done. Toast. It's time to imagine what comes next in the world of rationality.
DF