Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The study of common core from the beginning by those knowing what
they were looking for declared it a failure. Dumbing down America is still 
working for the Libs. They learned from pasted communist takeovers
dumb people are easier to control and has been that intent every since
Woodrow Wilson. 
 
The not so smart that have accepted the socialism lie and Democrat
government will shoot blank conspiracy shots at those that don't think 
as they do. 
@Jack Hammer posted:
The study of common core from the beginning by those knowing what
they were looking for declared it a failure. Dumbing down America is still 
working for the Libs. They learned from pasted communist takeovers
dumb people are easier to control and has been that intent every since
Woodrow Wilson. 
 
The not so smart that have accepted the socialism lie and Democrat
government will shoot blank conspiracy shots at those that don't think 
as they do. 

Yep... those Libs sure do try to take away the funding from education.. oh wait... that's the Republicans.... and judging by the post from you and your ilk, the dumbing down of America is working great for Republicans.

Think about it... what political party is constantly trying to remove any and all funding from public education?

All things being equal, the simplest solution is usually correct. Conspiracy theories are just away to distract from the real issue.

Yep... those Libs sure do try to take away the funding from education.. oh wait... that's the Republicans.... and judging by the post from you and your ilk, the dumbing down of America is working great for Republicans.

Think about it... what political party is constantly trying to remove any and all funding from public education?

All things being equal, the simplest solution is usually correct. Conspiracy theories are just away to distract from the real issue.

It's no longer a conspiracy 'theory' when it's been PROVEN.

Dummies still haven't caught on, they control education, since that time
we as a country haven't been able to read a newspaper. 
 
Why should the most important part of education at the most important
time in a students life be subjected to such an obviously failed liberal
teaching method, that in itself is as stupid as funding it. 
 
You don't know what you don't know and you can't tell those people
a dam thing.
 
To prove how stupid liberals are,,,, they can't pull off a simple collusion
probe without leaving a glaring trail of lies, clues, bodies, hand written
notes, tweets and a path of bread crumbs a mile wide. 
 
A. Schiff had all the evidence needed and still has it all for the time he
can show it, and the moron still doesn't know it's been over, it's as
over as the idiot Qberry has five or six original birth certificates. 
 

Obama Meeting Was Held to  make sure FBI Russia Collusion Probe Wasn't Discovered by the Trump Administration

 
A Key Obama Meeting Was Held to Ensure FBI Russia Collusion Probe Wasn't Discovered by the Trump Administration

Source: AP Photo/Nam Y. Huh

 

I mean, we shouldn’t be too shocked about this I guess, given the scale of the anti-Trump operation executed by the Obama administration. Then-President Obama had to have known. If not, then he wasn’t in control of the executive. Katie touched upon this earlier this week, noting that new documents from the Department of Justice in their motion to dismiss their case against ex-National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, who was the victim of an FBI plot to entrap him on perjury charges. Flynn has been vindicated, and more light is being shed on the scope of this whole operation. 

 

The deep state does exist. They’re malicious. They’re ruthless. Just look at the mindset of Andrew McCabe and James Comey, who were determined to ensnare Flynn, department policy, and constitutional rights be ****ed. It’s chilling. And now we’re seeing how Obama was the starting quarterback for how to ensure the incoming Trump administration would be saddled with the Trump-Russia collusion allegations. It was coordinated chaos. Here’s what Katie wrote about what the new DOJ revealed regarding this angle:

Newly released documents from the Department of Justice show President Obama informed former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates of a phone call between former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in December 2016. He did so in the Oval Office.

"Yates first learned of the December 2016 calls between [LTG Michael] Flynn and [Russian Ambassador to the United States, Sergey] Kislyak on January 5, 2017, while in the Oval Office. Yates, along with then FBI-Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, were at the White House to brief members of the Obama Administration on the classified Intelligence Community Assessment on Russian Activities in Recent U.S Elections. President Obama was joined by his National Security Advisor, Susan Rice, and others from the National Security Council," the document states.

"After the briefing, Obama dismissed the group but asked Yates and Comey to stay behind. Obama started by saying he had 'learned of the information about Flynn' and his conversation with Kislyak about sanctions. Obama specified he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information. At that point, Yates had no idea what the President was talking about, but figured it out based on the conversation. Yates recalled Comey mentioning the Logan Act, but can't recall if he specified there was an 'investigation,'" it continues.

That January 5 meeting appears to be critical, as Obama also gave his marching orders. Mollie Hemingway at The Federalist has a lengthy post detailing the meeting, the ensuing timelines, and how all the stars aligned to what Barry wanted. He wanted to make sure the incoming Trump administration didn’t find out about the FBI’s counterintelligence probe into Russian collusion. With that mindset, Obama officials soon weaponized the Russia collusion nonsense to inflict damage on the new Trump White House. Remember, Obama and most of the Democratic establishment thought Hillary was going to win. Obama administration officials thought so as well, as did the intelligence apparatus probably. They thought this could be swept under the rug once Hillary was sworn-in, washed away as if it never happened. Well, that plan got punched in the mouth. It was scrambling time (via The Federalist) [emphasis mine]:

A clearer picture is emerging of the drastic steps that were taken to accomplish Obama’s goal in the following weeks and months. Shortly thereafter, high-level operatives began intensely leaking selective information supporting a supposed Russia-Trump conspiracy theory, the incoming National Security Advisor was ambushed, and the incoming Attorney General was forced to recuse himself from oversight of investigations of President Trump. At each major point in the operation, explosive media leaks were a key strategy in the operation to take down Trump.

Not only was information on Russia not fully shared with the incoming Trump team, as Obama directs, the leaks and ambushes made the transition chaotic, scared quality individuals away from working in the administration, made effective governance almost impossible, and materially damaged national security. When Comey was finally fired on May 9, in part for his duplicitousness regarding his handling of the Russia collusion theory, he orchestrated the launch of a Special Counsel probe that continued his efforts for another two years. That probe ended with Mueller finding no evidence of any American colluding with Russia to steal the 2016 election, much less Trump or anyone connected to him.

An analysis of the timeline from early 2017 shows a clear pattern of behavior from the federal officials running the collusion operation against the Trump campaign. It also shows how essential media leaks were to their strategy to sideline key law enforcement and intelligence officials and cripple the ability of the incoming Trump administration to run the country.

[…]

January 5: Yates, Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper briefed Obama on Russia-related matters in the Oval Office. Biden and Rice also attended. After the Obama briefing, the intelligence chiefs who would be leaving at the end of the term were dismissed and Yates and Comey, who would continue in the Trump administration, were asked to stay. Not only did Obama give his guidance about how to perpetuate the Russia collusion theory investigations, he also talked about Flynn’s conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, according to both Comey and Yates. Interestingly, Clapper, Comey, and Yates all said that they did not brief Obama about these phone calls. Clapper testified he did not brief Obama on the calls, Yates learned about the calls from Obama himself during that meeting, and Comey also testified he didn’t brief Obama about the calls, even though the intelligence was an FBI product. Rice, who publicly lied but later admitted under oath to her widespread use of unmasked intelligence at the end of the Obama administration, likely briefed Obama on the calls and would have had access to the intelligence. Comey mentions the Logan Act at this meeting.

It was this meeting that Rice memorialized in a bizarre inauguration-day email to herself that claimed Obama told the gathered to do everything “by the book.” But Rice also noted in her email that the key point of discussion in that meeting was whether and how to withhold national security information, likely including details of the investigation into Trump himself, from the incoming Trump national security team.

And all of this was done for obvious reasons. The FBI’s actions here were deplorable. First, they used an unverified piece of opposition research, the Trump Dossier, to secure a FISA spy warrant on Carter Page, a former Trump campaign official. The FBI altered or omitted exculpatory evidence in the process to obtain the warrant, which DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz said was a systemic issue. Someone should be fired over this, but that won’t happen. The Horowitz report also drove a stake through the heart of the dossier, which was compiled by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele which was funded by the Democrats and Hillary Clinton. The dossier was probably never vetted by the FBI since former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe refused to say otherwise. By the glaring errors in it, it wasn’t. Also, let’s not forget about the spying operation into the Trump campaign. Sorry, it’s not spying, just informants gleaning information from Trump campaign officials under false pretenses and then relaying said information to a third party. The FBI sent a woman, Azra Turk, to run the operation which included Stefan Halper, another informant. Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos, a target of this surveillance operation called ‘Crossfire Hurricane,’ felt Turk was CIA, not an FBI agent, but that’s a tale for another time.

@JH1961 posted:

 RU: It's really sad that you can't differentiate between two totally different conversations. Do you get confused often? 

https://thehill.com/blogs/pund...r-from-the-beginning

https://www.educationviews.org...es-obama-bill-ayers/

My bad... the question still stands.

It's very confusing ... arguing with such ignorance. The Dunning-Kruger Effect is stunning among Republicans.

The resident blowhard is starting to slobber all over himself and the floor.
You're finished and the lying crap world you live in is finished.
And really, you're too stupid to pull off that phony narcissistic act you
seem to be so proud of. Better off if you stick with the hypocritical
neurotic stuff you're famous for anyway.  
@Jack Hammer posted:
The resident blowhard is starting to slobber all over himself and the floor.
You're finished and the lying crap world you live in is finished.
And really, you're too stupid to pull off that phony narcissistic act you
seem to be so proud of. Better off if you stick with the hypocritical
neurotic stuff you're famous for anyway.  

How many investigations will it take to make you stop sucking your thumb and throwing a temper tantrum?  Feel free to show any 'lie' I've posted on the forums. I'll wait. As far as stupid goes, reread any post you make, they're great examples of what stupidity can produce.

@Jack Hammer posted:
My posts have invariable outed your hate for a successful America.
How does it feel to be pinned up with today's communist liberal
thugs, although you do enjoy your neurotic de niro god and Pelosi
pinups, must be some wild solo celebrations in your basement. 

This is hilarious from the people who call their current POTUS 'the chosen one'.  Do you work hard at being this stupid or does it just come naturally to you?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×