Skip to main content

This isn't the only prison where this happens.


Probe finds NYC jail guards hired despite arrests, gang ties


NEW YORK (AP) — One applicant to be a New York City correction officer had been fired from his last job as a security guard for stealing. Another admitted he had regularly socialized with gang members. Another had debts of more than $400,000.

Yet all those candidates and dozens like them were hired last year to be part of the force overseeing nearly 11,000 inmates on Rikers Island, according to a yearlong city probe of jail hiring practices released Thursday.

The probe found systemic problems with the Department of Correction hiring system, including no recruiting strategy for the past six years, that allowed an alarmingly high number of hires who had arrest records, gang ties or other red flags that are markers for corruption.

Department of Investigation Commissioner Mark Peters said the chronic problems of violence, smuggling and bribery that plague the city jails can all be traced to the character and qualifications of the employees.

"Unless you have consistently qualified correction officers, solving the other problems we care about is an almost insurmountable task," Peters said.

"This is just a function of, for a decade, hirings and screenings and investigations being ignored."

City investigators randomly pulled 153 application files of guards hired last year and found that 54 — or 35 percent — "presented significant red flags that should have either precluded their hiring outright or required further follow-up."

The probe found 79 hired officers admitted having friends or family members who were inmates — including one with nine relatives who had done time in Rikers. Ten new hires had been arrested more than once, and another 12 had been rejected by the significantly higher standards of the New York Police Department, including six for psychological reasons and one who failed a drug test.

In all, this group appeared "simply unfit for law enforcement — whether working on the streets of New York City as police officers or in its jails," according to the report.

Jails Commissioner Joseph Ponte, who has pledged to reform the troubled correction department, said in a statement he was committed to "improving staff recruitment, training and retention" and would implement many of the investigators' recommendations.

Those included automatically disqualifying applicants who had been fired from a public agency or had any felony convictions in the past five years.  Since the investigation, three of the problem hires have been fired for misconduct, including one who had an "unduly familiar" relationship with an inmate later arrested in a murder-for-hire plot. Two of the hires resigned. Corrections officials wouldn't say what they will do with the rest .


Among other findings, there was no evidence applicants had been screened for gang affiliation, even though the jails' own intelligence officers rank it as the top threat to safety. It wasn't until after probe began that the jails began taking photos of applicants' tattoos to check for possible gang ties.

Investigators deemed application investigators undertrained and found they failed to make meaningful background checks or run credit reports. They were also reliant on an applicant evaluation scale of 1 to 5 despite no clear understanding of whether a '1' or a '5' was the best score. Thus, the report found, 90 percent of applicants received a meaningless '3' on the scale.

In order to become a correction officer, eligible candidates who take a civil service exam are vetted by jail application investigators, who conduct background checks, psychological screenings and other evaluations. A jail official then recommends an applicant be accepted or rejected, but the deputy commissioner in charge of hiring can override that decision.

Investigators found seven instances when the deputy commissioner in charge of hiring reversed decisions to reject unqualified candidates. In one case, a reject who scored poorly on the psychological exam was hired after her file noted she was a family friend of Norman Seabrook, the powerful president of the union representing 9,000 city correction officers. Seabrook didn't return a message seeking comment.

Rikers has come under increased scrutiny in the past year by the media and investigators, including federal prosecutors who have sued the city to institute reforms to what it has called a "deep-seated culture of violence."

Last edited by Bestworking
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I know someone in jail. She says the guards want sex from you and if you give it they treat you better, I don't know if that is true.


This goes on in all prisons. Look at the female guards that hook up with male inmates and plenty even get pregnant. OK, answer? Put cameras everywhere? What? Wait? Oh, they don't want their privacy invaded? Privacy in prison? No one should see them while they're walking around, eating, lying on their bunks reading, watching TV or having consensual sex with each other and/or the guards? Women, when they shower the showers can't be strictly off limits to males, yet still video taped and reviewed by females to make sure nothing is going on, and a record in case someone does have a complaint? ****ed if you do, ****ed if you don't.

Last edited by Bestworking

There is no parole in the federal system anymore.  However, if convicted of fraud, if later they agree to help the feds get the money back for their victims, the federal prosecutor will request a resentencing hearing -- reducing the sentence in some proportion of the funds recovered.  Always liked accompanying the prosecutor to those sessions -- lawyers, except for billing their hours, aren't great with numbers or accounting. After about a year, the crooks (especially the white collar ones) will give it all back just to get out early.  

Even a pos like susan smith, who was sentenced to life, should have gotten death, will have a parole hearing in 2024, and if she gets out will only be 53 years old. As it is now, she has consensual sexual affairs with male guards, (what winners they must be to want a piece of that thing), and a man pen pal that sends her thousands of dollars, plus a lesbian lover. Why is that allowed? Why in the world will she be given a parole hearing and why even put her in prison in the first place if you're going to turn her out? This is, once more, why I say IF life in prison really meant life, and if prison was actually punishment there would be no need for the death penalty.

Last edited by Bestworking

Add Reply

Untitled Document
Link copied to your clipboard.