Skip to main content

I wonder if you rethugliteacons have heard of this while watching Felony Fixed News???????

From the Washington Post and posted as a public service to show you thugs for the hypocrites you REALLY are:  Listen to the audio of Grover Norquist allowing for reversal of the Bush Tax cuts as not violating the "PLEDGE" (SHEESH, this whole party smacks of Fascism)

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...gIQAZ6y6RI_blog.html

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by rocky:

I wonder if you rethugliteacons have heard of this while watching Felony Fixed News???????

From the Washington Post and posted as a public service to show you thugs for the hypocrites you REALLY are:  Listen to the audio of Grover Norquist allowing for reversal of the Bush Tax cuts as not violating the "PLEDGE" (SHEESH, this whole party smacks of Fascism)

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...gIQAZ6y6RI_blog.html

 

 

Roxie! Why do we need anyone but you to tell us what fascist thug hypocrites we are... have you ever heard the story of the "moat" and the beam? Get rid of your own beams first.

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:

I wonder if you rethugliteacons have heard of this while watching Felony Fixed News???????

From the Washington Post and posted as a public service to show you thugs for the hypocrites you REALLY are:  Listen to the audio of Grover Norquist allowing for reversal of the Bush Tax cuts as not violating the "PLEDGE" (SHEESH, this whole party smacks of Fascism)

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...gIQAZ6y6RI_blog.html

 

 

Roxie! Why do we need anyone but you to tell us what fascist thug hypocrites we are... have you ever heard the story of the "moat" and the beam? Get rid of your own beams first.

SO, you are FOR eliminating the Bush Tax cuts like Grover Norquist???????????

 

(Well, like Norquist stated until he was caught up in his own HYPOCRISY)

Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

 

 

Roxie! Why do we need anyone but you to tell us what fascist thug hypocrites we are...


Truthfully, I agree with you marksw59, YOU DON'T but it is helpful to point out examples which is what I constantly do (and there are SO many)

and it does sooo much to bolster your sense of self importance while sarcasm seems to fly right over your little head.Take care of your beams...

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

 

 

Roxie! Why do we need anyone but you to tell us what fascist thug hypocrites we are...


Truthfully, I agree with you marksw59, YOU DON'T but it is helpful to point out examples which is what I constantly do (and there are SO many)

and it does sooo much to bolster your sense of self importance while sarcasm seems to fly right over your little head.Take care of your beams...

 OH, YOU were being sarcastic??????

I thought I was being sarcastic????????

You mean you are AWARE of the fascism and hypocrisy of the republican party???

So, you admit to being a fascist.

Well, at least you are not being HYPOCRITICAL about it!

Originally Posted by Ronnie P.:

Do you even know what those words mean rocky?


I'm sorry Ronnie P., I would love to give some definitions to you but I would think a man of your advanced age would know the meaning of the words used in this thread and ir would be good brain exercise for you to look them up yourself.  I will give you a clue:  hypocritical is synonymous these days with Republicans, and any other words you don't understand can be found in a what is called a "dictionary".

Have you had a check up for early alzheimers? It may be beneficial.

Originally Posted by interventor1212:

Rocky,

 

As fascism involves state centralized control of the economy, that better describes the democrats. Also, it wasn't Bush with the big light show in Berlin with faux columns near the Reichstag.  Looked like a cut rate  version of the Nuremberg rallies.


Mr. interventor,

I was referring to the pledge of loyalty required by Norquist as being fascist but of course you are right about the broad definition. 

But I thought the republicans were more convinced that democrats advocated socialism over fascism.

 

I have to disagree with your concept on this one but we are getting into perception of governing.

Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

 

 

Roxie! Why do we need anyone but you to tell us what fascist thug hypocrites we are...


Truthfully, I agree with you marksw59, YOU DON'T but it is helpful to point out examples which is what I constantly do (and there are SO many)

and it does sooo much to bolster your sense of self importance while sarcasm seems to fly right over your little head.Take care of your beams...

 OH, YOU were being sarcastic??????

Yes.

I thought I was being sarcastic????????

Who knows if you were if YOU don't even know. That seems to be a condition you find yourself in all too often, that of not knowing, or simply being wrong. When you learn to recognize this predicament, you will be able to correct it and be all the more happy for it!

You mean you are AWARE of the fascism and hypocrisy of the republican party???

Sigh... Roxie, I am not engaging in your silly little diatribe game.

So, you admit to being a fascist.

Maybe you should read this quick lesson on the correct meaning of the terms "right wing" and fascist, click HERE

Well, at least you are not being HYPOCRITICAL about it!

Correct, I am not being a hypocrite. However you can't seem to recognize that fact.

I have noticed that you, Roxie, are prone to at least textual histrionics. If I read your posts correctly, you come across like a preacher belting out and emphatically punctuating a sermon. Any preachers in your family? If not keep in mind that outside the pulpit, such is considered histrionics and usually a trait stereotypically attributed to flamboyant non hetero males... annnnd true believein', certified koolaid drinkin', nut roots American lefties.

 

For the record, I try to put the words out there that I can imagine Ben Stein speaking with an extra dose of condescension. Enjoy!

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

I have noticed that you, Roxie, are prone to at least textual histrionics. If I read your posts correctly, you come across like a preacher belting out and emphatically punctuating a sermon. Any preachers in your family?

marksw59,
I have no "healing" powers, so unfortunately you must ask God himself to deliver you from the debilitating affects of Foxophelia and HIS forgiveness for being a rabid right wing radical rethugliteacon:

 

BUT, I will keep you in my prayers.

Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

I have noticed that you, Roxie, are prone to at least textual histrionics. If I read your posts correctly, you come across like a preacher belting out and emphatically punctuating a sermon. Any preachers in your family?

marksw59,
I have no "healing" powers, so unfortunately you must ask God himself to deliver you from the debilitating affects of Foxophelia and HIS forgiveness for being a rabid right wing radical rethugliteacon:

 

BUT, I will keep you in my prayers.

Uhuh... riiiiight.... Again, you should revisit what you think you know about "right wing" and fascists, but since you won't go to a link I post, I'll put it in for you below....

 

A Quick Lesson for Media on the Definition of “Right Wing”

Posted by Dana Loesch Jul 23rd 2011 at 3:08 pm in Featured Story, Mainstream Media, corrections/retractions, media bias | Comments (143)

 

I loathe when American conservatives define themselves as “right wing” anything, even in jest — just as I loathe when the liberal press uses it as identification for American conservatives — because it is an inaccurate use of the term.

 

Via Wikipedia:

The terms Right and Left were coined during the French Revolution, referring to seating arrangements in parliament; those who sat on the right supported preserving the institutions of the Ancien Régime (the monarchy, the aristocracy and the established church). Use of the term “Right” became more prominent after the second restoration of the French monarchy in 1815 with the Ultra-royalists.

[...]

In the successive legislative assemblies, monarchists who supported the Ancien Régime were commonly referred to as rightists because they sat on the right side.

Ancien Régime is an ideology diametrically opposed to that of American conservatism, which advocates for the bare minimum of authority. The terms are also used to describe a split in modern-day leftist (by the correct definition, “far right&rdquo ideologies in WWI Italy.

A key element in the creation of fascism was the fusion of agendas of nationalists on the political right with Sorelian syndicalists on the left, around the outbreak of World War I.[19]

[...]

Nationalist and militarist influences that had begun to combine with syndicalism since 1907 created a split in the political left.[19] This split was strong in Italy, where nationalists and syndicalists increasingly influenced each other.[19] Maurassian nationalism, close to Sorelism, influenced radical Italian nationalist Enrico Corradini.[56] Corradini spoke of the need for a nationalist-syndicalist movement, led by elitist aristocrats and anti-democrats who shared a revolutionary syndicalist commitment to direct action and a willingness to fight.[56] Corradini spoke of Italy as being a “proletarian nation” that needed to pursue imperialism in order to challenge the “plutocratic” French and British.[57] Corradini’s views were part of a wider set of perceptions within the right-wing Italian Nationalist Association (ANI), which claimed that Italy’s economic backwardness was caused by corruption within its political class, liberalism, and division caused by “ignoble socialism”.

The Italian Nationalist Association?

Corradini occasionally used the term “national socialism” to define the ideology which he endorsed. Though this is the same term used by the movement of National Socialism in Germany (a.k.a.****sm) no evidence exists to indicate that Corradini’s use of the term had any influence.[4]

In 1914, the ANI began to tilt towards authoritarian nationalism with its endorsement of the creation of an authoritarian corporate state, a radical idea created by Italian law professor, Alfredo Rocco.[3] Such a corporate state led by a corporate assembly rather than a parliament, which would be composed of unions, business organizations and other economic organizations that would work within a powerful state government to regulate business-labour relations, organize the economy, end class conflict, and make Italy an industrial state which could compete with imperial powers and establish its own empire.[3]

In this instance, “left wing” and “right wing” was used to describe a fracture on one side only. No where in political history is “right wing” used to describe the ideology of limited government except during recent times by the left to discredit American conservatism — and many American conservatives allow such an uneducated misuse.

 

Using Norway’s government as an example: Norway is ruled by the Labour Party, a socialist party, and is affiliated with the Party of European Socialists. The Labour Party embraces the Keynesian economic theory and more centralized state control. This, according to the proper definition of the term “right wing,” would classify not only Norway’s socialist Labour Party as “right wing,” but would also classify America’s Democratic Socialists as “right wing.” ****s, officially the National Socialist Party, would be correctly classified as “right wing.” Ideologies which oppose such heavy-handed government control would be accurately considered “left-wing.”

Further confusion with the term “right wing” begins by misidentifying the hallmarks of such beliefs. “Right wing” accurately applies to total or increased government control (communism, socialism, monarchy, oligarchy, et al.) where as “left wing” describes either zero or little government control (anarchy, republic). An oldie but goodie video illustrating the differences and identifying factors of both wings:

 

A visual aid...

 

The media, in misusing “right wing” to immediately politicize the Oslo tragedy, indicted themselves on both ignorance and callousness.

In covering the tragedy in Norway, education on the accurate application and definition of these phrases is important, as is compassion for the suffering of Norway at this time.

More on ****smMarxism/Socialism (cue to 6:18 if you’re short on time). A must watch, courtesy P’oed Patriot


The Soviet Story [2008] - Excerpts 1

 

Last edited by marksw59
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

I have noticed that you, Roxie, are prone to at least textual histrionics. If I read your posts correctly, you come across like a preacher belting out and emphatically punctuating a sermon. Any preachers in your family?

marksw59,
I have no "healing" powers, so unfortunately you must ask God himself to deliver you from the debilitating affects of Foxophelia and HIS forgiveness for being a rabid right wing radical rethugliteacon:

 

BUT, I will keep you in my prayers.

 

So, no preachers in the family... just histrionics I guess then... Remember, keep in mind that outside the pulpit, such is considered histrionics and usually a trait stereotypically attributed to flamboyant non hetero males... annnnd true believein', certified koolaid drinkin', nut roots American lefties. 

Last edited by marksw59
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

I have noticed that you, Roxie, are prone to at least textual histrionics. If I read your posts correctly, you come across like a preacher belting out and emphatically punctuating a sermon. Any preachers in your family?

marksw59,
I have no "healing" powers, so unfortunately you must ask God himself to deliver you from the debilitating affects of Foxophelia and HIS forgiveness for being a rabid right wing radical rethugliteacon:

 

BUT, I will keep you in my prayers.

 

So, no preachers in the family... just histrionics I guess then... Remember, keep in mind that outside the pulpit, such is considered histrionics and usually a trait stereotypically attributed to flamboyant non hetero males... annnnd true believein', certified koolaid drinkin', nut roots American lefties. 


I don't know WHY I am playing this pointless game with you but the wife is at work and I am web surfing through the Daily Show so:

Yes, there ARE preachers in my family, one at a large church in Florence who is my uncle.

And I don't know why you keep trying to call me ***, I am not but if I was I don't think that would be a factor in this debate.

I notice you try this a lot.  At first I just chalked it up to some sort of 8th grade mentality, but I have read some of your rants of the same nature to Jimi and for that matter several other males on this forum you disagree with.

Are you homophobic or a closet homosexual???

Not that I care but there is a pattern here.

Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by rocky:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

I have noticed that you, Roxie, are prone to at least textual histrionics. If I read your posts correctly, you come across like a preacher belting out and emphatically punctuating a sermon. Any preachers in your family?

marksw59,
I have no "healing" powers, so unfortunately you must ask God himself to deliver you from the debilitating affects of Foxophelia and HIS forgiveness for being a rabid right wing radical rethugliteacon:

 

BUT, I will keep you in my prayers.

 

So, no preachers in the family... just histrionics I guess then... Remember, keep in mind that outside the pulpit, such is considered histrionics and usually a trait stereotypically attributed to flamboyant non hetero males... annnnd true believein', certified koolaid drinkin', nut roots American lefties. 


I don't know WHY I am playing this pointless game with you but the wife is at work and I am web surfing through the Daily Show so:

Yes, there ARE preachers in my family, one at a large church in Florence who is my uncle.

And I don't know why you keep trying to call me ***, I am not but if I was I don't think that would be a factor in this debate.

I notice you try this a lot.  At first I just chalked it up to some sort of 8th grade mentality, but I have read some of your rants of the same nature to Jimi and for that matter several other males on this forum you disagree with.

Are you homophobic or a closet homosexual???

Not that I care but there is a pattern here.

Not calling you ghey, just saying that you use an emphatic method of putting words out there usually employed by preachers in the pulpit and not entirely dissimilar from the histrionics displayed those you seem to think I am equating you with. As for "Jimi", he chose the image of an openly ghey actor for an avatar, one can only presume he identifies with the guy.

 

Oh yeah, the answer is no.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×