Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

If they are going to publish the names and photos of people who offend the law and get caught then they should do it for all and treat all equal.  One case though, that I'm aware of, a person who has the means was able to buy their way out of the paper and never appeared in a single issue even though they were arrested for drunk driving or dealing.  I never was able to find out exactly what they were arrested for just that they were able to buy their way out (keep their photo and name out) of Hardtimes.  

 

Personally I've never bought one of the papers but if it's public information and legal to do so what's so bad about it?  After all the folks that are listed there got there by actually being arrested didn't' they?    Sounds to me it's a case where someone found a way to make a buck supplying what, apparently  a great number of people want.

Originally Posted by mamyliga:

 I have held this woithin my bowels for far too long, and now I havta let it go- to the bottoem feeders who publis this fish wrap,  I say to you ....it may be legale,  but it is immorale, unethecal, and just dam wrong.  You hav brough pain an it wil come back to you

______

What did you do to get your picture in it?

Originally Posted by mamyliga:

 I have held this woithin my bowels for far too long, and now I havta let it go- to the bottoem feeders

who publis this fish wrap,  I say to you ....it may be legale,  but it is immorale, unethecal, and just dam wrong.  You hav brough pain an it wil come back to you

___

Your earlier posts are not contaminated with such multiple and reprehensible errors of spelling and grammar as you have achieved in this post.  Have you suffered a stroke or are you drunk or on drugs or WHAT? Find some help for whatever is afflicting you.

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by mamyliga:

 I have held this woithin my bowels for far too long, and now I havta let it go- to the bottoem feeders

who publis this fish wrap,  I say to you ....it may be legale,  but it is immorale, unethecal, and just dam wrong.  You hav brough pain an it wil come back to you

___

Your earlier posts are not contaminated with such multiple and reprehensible errors of spelling and grammar as you have achieved in this post.  Have you suffered a stroke or are you drunk or on drugs or WHAT? Find some help for whatever is afflicting you.

==================

Shhhhhhhhh, we weren't supposed to notice that.

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by mamyliga:

 I have held this woithin my bowels for far too long, and now I havta let it go- to the bottoem feeders

who publis this fish wrap,  I say to you ....it may be legale,  but it is immorale, unethecal, and just dam wrong.  You hav brough pain an it wil come back to you

___

Your earlier posts are not contaminated with such multiple and reprehensible errors of spelling and grammar as you have achieved in this post.  Have you suffered a stroke or are you drunk or on drugs or WHAT? Find some help for whatever is afflicting you.

 

Some of her posts use a patois and some do not. It's a mixed bag. She's still been here longer that most and she's entitled to her opinion. As I stated, I don't really agree with it.

A teacher in one post, and teetering on the edge of illiteracy in another. 

 

 

 

 

Small Talker
 
April 5, 2011 3:23 PM
 
 

If anyone would care to listen, I can tell you that teachers loathe testing...it is a waste of time, both the teachers and the students. It solves nothing, proves nothing, and nothing can be based upon it. It devastates structure..(which, in turn, creates discipline problems)..It takes away from precious class time, and kids never take them seriously...but what do I know...I'm just a teacher, and we have seen in the past few months how most of the nation feels about teachers....

 

Maybe she/he did have a stroke.
 
 
 
 
Small Talker
 
20 hours ago
 

 I have held this woithin my bowels for far too long, and now I havta let it go- to the bottoem feeders

who publis this fish wrap,  I say to you ....it may be legale,  but it is immorale, unethecal, and just dam wrong.  You hav brough pain an it wil come back to you

 

-------------------------------------------------------------

 

Small Talker
 
March 9, 2011 4:47 PM
 
 

No sense arguing with you, Opie. Your mind has been made up since your first year in the 7th grade. I've met you and I have taught your child. Despite that fact, I am still teaching...although I did learn a lot from you. You are a role model for everything that is wrong with education, consequently, your input is very valuable.

 

mamyliga, Best and her partner in slime think you're in with the couple who own the Quad Cities Daily and that it was a set up for me to mention it.

 

I'm assuming, since yesterday was the first day of school, someone was arrested this summer and all the kids know it because of Hard Times? I've heard a similar tale from Colbert County. The kid's parents couldn't care less that their son is a jerk, but they're mad that now his fellow students know it. Instead of thinking of it as a form of abuse, why not think of it as a wake up call?

Poor kate, I see your cryabeetus has flared up again. It always does that when you're called on your sneaking ways. The only "partners in slime" are you and all your pals that slitter around on the forum looking for ways to toss in a free ad for those gossip sites they try to pass off as news sites, while, and this is the really rotten part, you're running down the TD, the very one you're using to advertise those blogs for free.  Oh, and btw, that's the real reason "frienze" was banned. But you knew that.

All right, Best. Let's put it this way.

 

1. I have no idea who mamyliga is.

2. I respect her enough as a member of the forum to not tell her she can't post here. After all, it looks like she's been here over a year longer than you have.

3. Yes, I got in a plug for the QCD, but they didn't ask for it. Shoot me.

4. Didn't a friend of FV just tell you last week why she was banned? Everyone lies but you, right?

5. It looks like mamyliga is a friend of O No. You didn't like O No much, did you?

6. Since the QCD was specifically mentioned, care to tell us what gossip they've published that irritated you so much?

Well kate, let's put it this way. I have no idea who mamyliga is, all i saw was someone posting as though they hadn't completed first grade. I have no idea how long she's been here, doesn't matter if she's been here 50 years. What kind of status does that give her?  I see her posts claiming to be a teacher and then her attempt, apparently, to appear illiterate. Kinda strange wouldn't you say? I have no idea what a friend of frienzes posted. I have no idea if mamyliga is a friend of ono or not, and couldn't care less if she is. That carries no weight with me, so what's your point?  Semi is a friend of mine, and you don't like her. So again, what is your point? Where did I call anyone a liar in these posts? No, I don't lie, and I don't think all on here do, but there are enough that lie. Again, I don't read those gossip sites you post the links to. I did make the mistake of clicking on one and saw what it was, that's the last time I clicked on any link you post. Where did I or anyone else for that matter say mymaliga didn't have the right to post here?  As semi says, try as hard as you might, but you don't own these forums and we don't have to kowtow to you and post only things that please you.

Originally Posted by Kate Colombo:

So just for starters, you can't point out one instance of "gossip" on the QCD, yet you've called it a gossip site?

===================

See if you can find a five year old to help you out, apparently you can't follow along. I didn't call it anything. I plainly said I don't click on your links anymore. You know exactly what sites I'm posting about. Read it again, slowly.

 

 

The only "partners in slime" are you and all your pals that slitter around on the forum looking for ways to toss in a free ad for those gossip sites they try to pass off as news sites, while, and this is the really rotten part, you're running down the TD, the very one you're using to advertise those blogs for free.

Originally Posted by mamyliga:

 I have held this woithin my bowels for far too long, and now I havta let it go- to the bottoem feeders

who publis this fish wrap,  I say to you ....it may be legale,  but it is immorale, unethecal, and just dam wrong.  You hav brough pain an it wil come back to you

 

 

Originally Posted by Kate Colombo:

No, I'm just pretty sure you think everyone is someone else. I won't use the "s" word, even if you did.

Wait, don't we all think everyone here is someone else?

That seems to be the standard tactic when debate gives way to mudslinging.  Just accuse the other guy of being Rram, and he'll accuse you of the same, and then everyone else says "It's Rram arguing with himself again" before they abandon the thread.

Originally Posted by Kate Colombo:

The only site mentioned here was the Quad Cities Daily. Yes, I mentioned it first. Then you mentioned "gossip site." Unless you're the one who can't follow along, why say it?

================

Yes kate, I did post "gossip sites". You "run your mouth" about "partners in slime", and I pointed out it's YOUR behavior that I consider slimy. Such as the way you and your partners slime around here looking for all sorts of reasons to mention the "gossip sites", and you know exactly which ones i mean. That, among other things about you is what I call slimy. Then you fly off in all sorts of directions. "The poster has a right to post here". Who said they didn't?  "Everyone is a liar except you". Who called them a liar? "This poster has been here longer than you"? So what? "This poster is a friend of ono". Again, so what?  

 

As for posters using other IDs, which some absolutely do, who said this poster was doing or had done that? I questioned why they claimed to be a teacher on other threads, then posted what almost amounted to jibberish, on this thread. Their gripe was with hard times publishing arrest information. You step in to say that your pet site "removes the offending info but the TD and others don't".  In other words they printed the same things about the people, but somehow that didn't "offend" anyone because they later removed it?  So you think they can "unring that bell"? I asked you what "offending info"? They were arrested, and as you like to say, it's public information. 

 

 

 

 

1. Again, I do not know who mamyliga is and she is not my partner in anything. The only partner I have is my husband, and thank God not in business.

 

2. Your post on FV being banned was in opposition to what her friend had said last week. Wasn't that calling the friend a liar?

 

3. I have nothing to do with the QCD except as a reader/fan. You can't show me any gossip on the site and you know it. End of story. (Unless I've missed it, but you say you don't read it. You just call it a gossip site because it's local?)

I didn't call mamyliga your partner. I have no idea what frienze's "friend" posted about her being banned. And lastly, and hopefully for the last time, you know which sites I am referring to when I say "gossip sites" you support/push. Common sense, if you had any, would tell you I mean the ones I did see. As for the other, I've explained that I didn't click on your link to it, given the other sites you support. So show me where I called it a gossip site. You being a reader/fan tells me all I need to know about it, 

To Bestworking,  A few years back, I was sequestered for a trial.  After 4 days of court,we were in the jury room rehashing the evidence.  One lady said, " I don't want to hear anymore.  If they didn't do it, they wouldn't have been arrested."  She did not want to hear any facts, she made her mind up,  because they were charged, they had to be guilty.  Some of those in Hard Times are innocent, but to all the world that reads Hard Times, they are guilty because their picture is in the publication.

Add Reply


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×