Skip to main content

This ought to be right up your alley. Unfortunately, the participants in the study don't indicate whether they own any firearms or not.

 

The federal government helped fund a study that  examined what effect a g a y man's weenie size has on his sex life and general  well-being.

 

The study was among several backed by the National  Institutes of Health that have come under scrutiny from a group claiming the  agency is wasting valuable tax dollars at a time when the country is trying to  control its debt. This particular research resulted in a 2009 report titled,  "The Association Between ***** Size and Sexual Health Among Men Who Have Sex  with Men."

 
The study reported, among its findings, that *** men  with "below average *****es" were more likely to assume a "bottom" sexual  position, while those with "above average *****es" were more likely to assume a  "top" sexual position. Those with average *****es identified themselves as  "versatile" in the bedroom.
 

Though it's difficult to trace exactly how much  federal funding went to the project, the study was one of many linked to an  $899,769 grant in 2006. The grant was administered by NIH's National Institute  on Drug Abuse, and went first to a group called Public Health Solutions and a  researcher with the National Development and Research Institutes before going to  individual researchers.

 

Those researchers then compiled data from a survey  of more than 1,000 *** and bisexual men at events in New York City for the ***  community. "This country is broke and we cannot spend money on  this kind of stuff," said Andrea Lafferty, president of the Traditional Values  Coalition, which drew attention to the report as part of a six-month  investigation into NIH grants for examples of "institutional waste."

 

"We're spending money on wacky stuff," Lafferty  said. But one of the researchers involved with the report  told FoxNews.com that NIH funding was only used to help "analyze and write up"  data that had already been collected without the use of taxpayer  funds. "The data were not collected using taxpayer funds,"  Jeffrey Parsons, a professor with Hunter College, said in an email. "NIH funds  were not used to measure anyone's ***** size."

 

He said part of the 2006 grant went toward the  primary author's post-survey analysis as part of his postdoctoral fellowship to  "better inform sexual health promotion efforts."

Parsons took issue with Lafferty's description of  the grant.

 

A Traditional Values Coalition release stated that  at least $9.4 million went to a 10-year study that included the *****-size  research -- but Parsons said it appears that references a much broader  "post-doctoral training program" of which the *****-study funding was a "small"  part.

 

Other studies stemming from the same 2006 grant  examined topics ranging from the drug market in Houston following Hurricane  Katrina to the connection between contraceptives and STD prevention in Madagascar.

 

"To suggest that 9.4 million dollars was spent to  study ***** sizes is factually inaccurate and simply designed to create news,"  Parsons wrote.

 

The study, which last year was published in the  Archives of Sexual Behavior, claimed there previously had been "little research  among men who have sex with men assessing the association between ***** size and  socio-sexual health."

 

The study found that men with larger *****es were  more likely to contract certain sexually  transmitted diseases. It also found that men with above-average *****es  enjoyed more satisfaction with their lifestyle.

 

The original survey had a relatively high response  rate -- with 83 percent of those approached agreeing to participate. "As an  incentive, those who completed the survey were given a voucher for free  admission to a movie," the study said.

 

Lafferty's group drew attention to several other  studies Monday that it claimed were "bizarre" in the current fiscal climate.  Among them was one that asked individuals to "mail in their toenails" to measure  "toenail nicotine," according to the values coalition.

 

"The president has said he's going to hunt down  waste. Well, I'm going to give it to him on a platter," Lafferty said.

 

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politic...unity/#ixzz1SUdW8fHW

'The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.'

'When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.'

'And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.'

'An elective despotism was not the government we fought for.' - Thomas Jefferson

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

A two-year-old girl died from suspected malnutrition months after being released from foster care to her biological parents.

Though no one has been arrested, police say that the parents of Vyctorya Sandoval, from Los Angeles, are suspects in the investigation.

When she died, bruises covered her body, a rib was fractured and blood tests suggested she died thirsty and hungry.

 


 

 

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:

A two-year-old girl died from suspected malnutrition months after being released from foster care to her biological parents.

Though no one has been arrested, police say that the parents of Vyctorya Sandoval, from Los Angeles, are suspects in the investigation.

When she died, bruises covered her body, a rib was fractured and blood tests suggested she died thirsty and hungry.

 


 

 

Someone’s got to say it.

As sorry as I feel for this little girl, your point is?

The Republicans caused her death how?

Your accusing us of what?

Skippy

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:

What would have prevented the senseless torture and death of this innocent little girl?

I bet you are smart enough to figure it out.  I think you can do it.

 

Let's see, Good Parents.

Better decisions by social workers.

When I was young I had three siblings, my Mom and Dad were divorced.

We were dirt poor living in a single wide trailer. We didn't get food stamps, welfare

or public housing.

Some how my Mom didn't kill me.

Still waiting for your point.

Skippy

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:

What would have prevented the senseless torture and death of this innocent little girl?

I bet you are smart enough to figure it out.  I think you can do it.

 


I'm not for Govt funded abortion but I would be for Govt required sterilization especially since she is carrying her 11th child.

In a partisan stand against the Affordable Care Act, Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R-FL) and GOP lawmakers are turning away much-needed federal funds aimed at preventing child abuse and neglect. According to Linda Merrell of the Florida Child Healthcare Coalition, the state has missed out on up to $52 million in federal funding$3.4 million of which Scott turned down this year and millions more in grants available under Section 2951 of the Affordable Care Act for home health visits.

 

http://floridaindependent.com/...ld-abuse-and-neglect

 

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:

In a partisan stand against the Affordable Care Act, Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R-FL) and GOP lawmakers are turning away much-needed federal funds aimed at preventing child abuse and neglect. According to Linda Merrell of the Florida Child Healthcare Coalition, the state has missed out on up to $52 million in federal funding$3.4 million of which Scott turned down this year and millions more in grants available under Section 2951 of the Affordable Care Act for home health visits.

 

http://floridaindependent.com/...ld-abuse-and-neglect

 


Florida realizes that the Federal Government is flat broke and is passing out money it doesn't have.

God Bless Florida.

 

Skippy

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×