Skip to main content

Iowa Town Hit Hard by Whirlpool Job Cuts

Whirlpool today announced the elimination of 4,500 jobs at several manufacturing sites around the country and also in Mexico and Canada. The company has about 80,000 workers in all. Last March, Whirlpool bought its smaller rival, Maytag, for $1.7 billion. In business terms, that's what's called consolidation. In people terms, it means that in a town called Newton, Iowa, 1,000 people are losing their jobs at a washer and dryer making plant.

Many of the cuts will come from the closing of plants in Newton, Iowa. Robert talks with Pete Slings, who has worked at Maytag for 20 years and owns a town sports bar.

 

http://www.npr.org/templates/s....php?storyId=5397277

 

That must be a real kick in the gut. You have a good job with a good employer; somebody buys them out; and, all of a sudden, they close your plant and move your job to Mexico. That's real "job creation" there! How about another round of tax cuts so we can see a few thousand more jobs disappear?

 

Arkansas town braces as Whirlpool shuts big plant

(Reuters) - Eleanor Roller says she and her husband Bob opened their 24-hour diner 'Bob and Ellie's' ten years ago a stone's throw from the big Whirlpool plant because a good piece of property was for sale.

But the closeness to thousands of round-the-clock manufacturing workers at Whirlpool certainly didn't hurt.

"Whirlpool used to have two and three shifts," Roller said in an interview. "But then they only had one, with no lunch break. So we felt that."

They felt it even more last week. Whirlpool, the world's largest manufacturer of household appliances, said that it would close its Fort Smith plant by mid-2012.

The plant, the biggest in the city of 86,200, employed 4,600 people as recently as 2004. But Whirlpool has down-sized steadily since then, with the final shuttering to eliminate 90 salaried and 884 hourly employees.

"Given the weakening global economic environment, we are today announcing aggressive plans that will result in substantial cost and capacity reductions," Whirlpool's chief executive Jeff Fettig said in a statement on Friday.

The job cuts are among 5,000 positions -- one in 10 in North America and Europe -- cut by Whirlpool, which employs 71,000 people around the world.

Whirlpool said the plant's remaining production, mainly side-by-side refrigerators, would be taken over by a plant in Ramos Arizpe, Mexico. But Gosack said consumer demand for those refrigerators was weak and he expected them to be phased out completely before long.


Such commercial logic was harder to cope with for people like Roller, who is near retirement age and says thinking of a new career won't help. Rising food costs, the bad economy and the Whirlpool news have just made her weary, she said.

"It's my regulars I depend on and hopefully they'll keep coming," she said. "The last three years have been the worst. I can't raise the menu prices because people can't afford to eat out now.

As Whirlpool downsized in recent years, the city also wooed several non-manufacturing businesses. Sykes Enterprises recently opened a call center that employees 500 people. Golden Living, a healthcare company, plans to add 200 jobs. Mitsubishi Power Systems will bring another 300.

But Fort Smith, once considered the state's manufacturing capital, has lost 33 percent of its manufacturing jobs in the last 10 years, Gosack said.

One study estimated an annual loss of $57 million in wages for the 974 Whirlpool workers and about 500 other local workers like plastic makers connected to the Whirlpool plant, according to Gregory Hamilton, an economist at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
(That's the "ripple effect" that has consequences beyond the plant itself.)


The tax base and the services it supports, especially school districts, will also be squeezed. In 2010, the company paid $1.1 million in local property taxes, Gosack said.

 

http://www.reuters.com/article...dUSTRE79U5QK20111031

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

In addition to our company’s advocacy efforts, Whirlpool participates in the political process through the Whirlpool Corporation Political Action Committee (WCPAC) and through corporate political contributions in those jurisdictions where it is permissible to do so.

Whirlpool maintains comprehensive compliance procedures to ensure that its activities are conducted in accordance with all relevant laws governing political contributions and lobbying activities.  Additionally, as part of its oversight role, the Board of Directors annually reviews the company’s Code of Ethics, which addresses the company’s policies and practices related to political contributions.

 

2010, WCPAC contributed $37,500 to the following federal and state candidates in the United States.

Candidate/Committee Name

Amount

Office

State

Baucus, Sen. Max

$    500.00

U.S. Senate

Mont.

Boyd, Rep. Allan

$1,500.00

U.S. House

Fla.

Brownback, Sen. Sam         

$2,000.00

U.S. Senate   

Kan.

Camp, Rep. Dave

$3,000.00

U.S. House

Mich.

Emerson, Rep Jo Ann

$1,000.00

U.S. House

Mo.

Grassley, Sen. Charles

$1,000.00

U.S. Senate

Iowa

Jordan, Rep. Jim

$   500.00

U.S. House

Ohio

Israel, Rep. Steve

$3,500.00

U.S. House   

N.Y.

Issakson,  Sen. Johnny

$2,500.00

U.S. Senate

Ga.

Latta, Rep. Bob

$1,500.00

U.S. House

Ohio

Levin, Rep. Sander

$2,500.00

U.S. House   

Mich.

Lincoln, Sen. Blanche

$3,000.00

U.S. Senate

Ark.

Murray, Sen. Patty

$2,500.00

U.S. Senate

Mich.

Portman, Rob

$1,000.00

Candidate for U.S. Senate

Ohio

Rangel, Rep. Charles

$2,000.00

U.S. House

N.Y.

Reid, Sen. Harry

$6,500.00

U.S. Senate

Nev.

Stabenow, Sen. Debbie   

$2,000.00

U.S. Senate

Mich.

Strickland, Gov. Ted

$1,500.00

Ohio Governor

Ohio

Trade Association

Percentage of Dues Used for Lobbying / Political Expenditures

The Business Roundtable

53%

National Association of Manufacturers

26%

Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy

50%

Michigan Manufacturing Association

48%

Tennessee Chamber of Commerce and Industry

30%

Michigan Chamber of Commerce

30%

Ohio Chamber of  Commerce         

20%

Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM – Majors)

5%

Business Roundtable’s Position on Regulatory Reform

 

America’s CEOs applaud President Obama’s initiative to streamline the federal regulatory apparatus, review all existing federal regulation and avoid new regulations that impede innovation, diminish U.S. competitiveness in the global economy and restrain job creation and economic expansion – while providing little or no benefit to Americans.

 

http://businessroundtable.org/...n-regulatory-reform/

 

http://www.whirlpoolcorp.com/r...e/contirbutions.aspx

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Makes no difference juan. Your hero bill clinton was in complete agreement and in charge, signed it into law. So post all you want, but you can't lay this one at the feet of republicans only.


NAFTA created the problem, and the Bush cabal created NAFTA.  Destroying the economy of middle class America is a uniquely Repubic, and seemingly Bush Family derived problem. 

Our economy is changing. The days of going to the plant and working for 25 years then living off of a pension are done. However, unemployment among college grads is at 4% and many companies are struggling to find applicants with suitable engineering and math skills.

 

Economies always change. Using the logic of many on this board they would have been against the Industrial Revolution because it put the shoe cobbler and blacksmith out of business.

Originally Posted by Kenny Powers:

Our economy is changing. The days of going to the plant and working for 25 years then living off of a pension are done. However, unemployment among college grads is at 4% and many companies are struggling to find applicants with suitable engineering and math skills.

 

Economies always change. Using the logic of many on this board they would have been against the Industrial Revolution because it put the shoe cobbler and blacksmith out of business.


Historically, as economies change, they eventually collapse.  Repeating history is not progress.  Loss of manufacturing skills is not beneficial to America. 

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

In addition to our company’s advocacy efforts, Whirlpool participates in the political process through the Whirlpool Corporation Political Action Committee (WCPAC) and through corporate political contributions in those jurisdictions where it is permissible to do so.

Whirlpool maintains comprehensive compliance procedures to ensure that its activities are conducted in accordance with all relevant laws governing political contributions and lobbying activities.  Additionally, as part of its oversight role, the Board of Directors annually reviews the company’s Code of Ethics, which addresses the company’s policies and practices related to political contributions.

 

2010, WCPAC contributed $37,500 to the following federal and state candidates in the United States.

Candidate/Committee Name

Amount

Office

State

Baucus, Sen. Max

$    500.00

U.S. Senate

Mont.

Boyd, Rep. Allan

$1,500.00

U.S. House

Fla.

Brownback, Sen. Sam         

$2,000.00

U.S. Senate   

Kan.

Camp, Rep. Dave

$3,000.00

U.S. House

Mich.

Emerson, Rep Jo Ann

$1,000.00

U.S. House

Mo.

Grassley, Sen. Charles

$1,000.00

U.S. Senate

Iowa

Jordan, Rep. Jim

$   500.00

U.S. House

Ohio

Israel, Rep. Steve

$3,500.00

U.S. House   

N.Y.

Issakson,  Sen. Johnny

$2,500.00

U.S. Senate

Ga.

Latta, Rep. Bob

$1,500.00

U.S. House

Ohio

Levin, Rep. Sander

$2,500.00

U.S. House   

Mich.

Lincoln, Sen. Blanche

$3,000.00

U.S. Senate

Ark.

Murray, Sen. Patty

$2,500.00

U.S. Senate

Mich.

Portman, Rob

$1,000.00

Candidate for U.S. Senate

Ohio

Rangel, Rep. Charles

$2,000.00

U.S. House

N.Y.

Reid, Sen. Harry

$6,500.00

U.S. Senate

Nev.

Stabenow, Sen. Debbie   

$2,000.00

U.S. Senate

Mich.

Strickland, Gov. Ted

$1,500.00

Ohio Governor

Ohio

 

 

Just look at all of those DEMOCRATS there. Looks like "Honest Harry" and "Citizen Rangle" did pretty well.

Once again, examples of the liberal hypocrisy in these forums and the US at large.

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Makes no difference juan. Your hero bill clinton was in complete agreement and in charge, signed it into law. So post all you want, but you can't lay this one at the feet of republicans only.


NAFTA created the problem, and the Bush cabal created NAFTA.  Destroying the economy of middle class America is a uniquely Repubic, and seemingly Bush Family derived problem. 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

So what you are saying is that Bush wanted to destroy the economy and bill clinton went along with it. You can't win this one juan, the democrites were ****** deep in this.

 

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Makes no difference juan. Your hero bill clinton was in complete agreement and in charge, signed it into law. So post all you want, but you can't lay this one at the feet of republicans only.


NAFTA created the problem, and the Bush cabal created NAFTA.  Destroying the economy of middle class America is a uniquely Repubic, and seemingly Bush Family derived problem. 

 

 

With much consideration and emotional discussion, the House of Representatives approved NAFTA on November 17, 1993, by a vote of 234 to 200. The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. NAFTA passed the Senate 61-38. Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats. Clinton signed it into law on December 8, 1993; it went into effect on January 1, 1994.[1][2] Clinton while signing the NAFTA bill stated: "...NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American jobs. If I didn't believe that, I wouldn't support this agreement."[3]

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

What's your point juan? You're proven wrong so you do a little sidestep and bring up reagan. How desperate is that!


Dream on.  I am never wrong.

Reagan's plan for amnesty carried over to the BushI admin, and the result was NAFTA.  Reagan first proposed a North American trade accord during his campaign in 1979.  NAFTA is a wet dream for the Repubic corporatists, as evidenced by the original post in this thread. 

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Why do you ignore clinton's and the other democrites part in nafta juan? Because you have no argument is why. And you need to revise your statement to read you are never right.  Whenever you are ask for proof you have none, when you ask for proof and it's given to you, you drop or change the subject.


My job is to make fun of Repubics.  The Dems make fun of themselves. 

NAFTA is the brainchild of Reagan, instituted by BushI for the benefit of corporate America which are the master of the Repubic Party.  ou can deny all you want, but the 175 viewers of this thread know I'm right, as always, and you are wrong. 

Go have a pep rally with Skippy, the *uck, and the rest of the losers. 

Originally Posted by mad American:

How did the tax cuts for ALL AMERICANS hurt the economy?  How will tax increases on anyone help America?  They won't, never have never will.  Vote for candidates that support a flat tax and America wil prosper in my opinion. 


Clinton raised taxes, balanced the budget, created 25million jobs, all with his pants down and his junk on some chicks chin. 

My job is to make fun of Repubics.  The Dems make fun of themselves.

NAFTA is the brainchild of Reagan, instituted by BushI for the benefit of corporate America which are the master of the Repubic Party.  ou can deny all you want, but the 175 viewers of this thread know I'm right, as always, and you are wrong.

Go have a pep rally with Skippy, the *uck, and the rest of the losers.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

If that is you job I sure hope you have something to "fall back on" because you're failing at this one. NAFTA was as much of the democrites baby as it ever was the republicans. It's not looking like the 173 viewers are agreeing with you at all, and that sounds like bill gray's argument about the thousands he reaches on the religion forum, and just as ridiculous. You can't even hold your arguments in the road. You rail against republicans but say democrites deported more illegals. Odd that you'd brag about that considering that you never met an illegal you didn't like and you uphold them when they break our laws. Now you are trying to lay nafta at the feet of the republicans when clinton took the time out from chasing bimbos to sign it into law. YOU can deny it all you want but the facts are the facts and not even your pitiful attempt of spinning it will change that.

I feel sorry for people who form their economic beliefs based on what a politician tells them.

 Does it really matter what your economic "beliefs" are, when it's politicians who dictate the terms?

 

You just hit on the problem. Gov't should not be dictating the terms. Gov't should not be picking which businesses get loans or bailouts. Gov't should not be telling business owners how to run their business by burdening them with regulations. I also don't think that gov't should be involved in what a woman does with her body or what 2 consenting adults do in their bedroom either. 

 

The Libertarian Party believe these things and is a great alternative to the 2 major parties which are both controlled by the same corporate donors.  

 

 

Originally Posted by Kenny Powers:

I feel sorry for people who form their economic beliefs based on what a politician tells them.

 Does it really matter what your economic "beliefs" are, when it's politicians who dictate the terms?

 

You just hit on the problem. Gov't should not be dictating the terms. Gov't should not be picking which businesses get loans or bailouts. Gov't should not be telling business owners how to run their business by burdening them with regulations. I also don't think that gov't should be involved in what a woman does with her body or what 2 consenting adults do in their bedroom either. 

 

The Libertarian Party believe these things and is a great alternative to the 2 major parties which are both controlled by the same corporate donors.  

 

Welcome to the real world. See me here:   Minarchists

Propie's little rant about a relocation by Whirlpool over 5 years ago and "job creation" bear little correlation.  But, then Propie is simply a propagandist,  logic not his strong point.

 

Europe and Japan are dumping numerous high paying job building cars in the US. I'll trade those for jobs building washing machines, any day.  Building cars requires many more suppliers and even more jobs.  

Originally Posted by The Propagandist:
Originally Posted by interventor1212:

Propie's little rant about a relocation by Whirlpool over 5 years ago and "job creation" bear little correlation.  But, then Propie is simply a propagandist,  logic not his strong point.

 

 

 

 

When your argument has no merit, or you just flat out have no argument, name-calling is a way to stay noticed.

I call you by your screen name and you squeal. How ironic!  The premise of my statement remains valid.  I'll gladly take higher paying jobs coming from overseas.

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:
Originally Posted by Kenny Powers:

Our economy is changing. The days of going to the plant and working for 25 years then living off of a pension are done. However, unemployment among college grads is at 4% and many companies are struggling to find applicants with suitable engineering and math skills.

 

Economies always change. Using the logic of many on this board they would have been against the Industrial Revolution because it put the shoe cobbler and blacksmith out of business.


Historically, as economies change, they eventually collapse.  Repeating history is not progress.  Loss of manufacturing skills is not beneficial to America. 

 

Ridiculous statement from a person who, obviously doesn't know history!  When the US changed from agrarian to industrial during the first industrial revolution, it didn't  collapse.  Neither, did the UK, or most of western Europe. 

 

When the US adopted the assembly line and interchangeable parts, it didn't collapse. 

 

Give an example of your premise, other than the Soviet Union, which fell because of the inherent inconsistencies of its existence.

Originally Posted by interventor1212:
Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:
Originally Posted by Kenny Powers:

Our economy is changing. The days of going to the plant and working for 25 years then living off of a pension are done. However, unemployment among college grads is at 4% and many companies are struggling to find applicants with suitable engineering and math skills.

 

Economies always change. Using the logic of many on this board they would have been against the Industrial Revolution because it put the shoe cobbler and blacksmith out of business.


Historically, as economies change, they eventually collapse.  Repeating history is not progress.  Loss of manufacturing skills is not beneficial to America. 

 

Ridiculous statement from a person who, obviously doesn't know history!  When the US changed from agrarian to industrial during the first industrial revolution, it didn't  collapse.  Neither, did the UK, or most of western Europe. 

 

When the US adopted the assembly line and interchangeable parts, it didn't collapse. 

 

Give an example of your premise, other than the Soviet Union, which fell because of the inherent inconsistencies of its existence.


How about the EU?

Collapse is imminent. 

Or the USA?

Were it not for $2Trillion of spending, collapse would have already occurred.

 

But, you two idiots have no worries, the Communist Chinese will come to the rescue of the capitalists...Again.  Maybe someday we can have a functional socialist/communist system that is immune from the boom and bust cycles we suffer through.

Last edited by Mr.Dittohead

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×