Skip to main content

These to young high school graduates, which are joining the military, were unjustly punished. People like Rick Kaufman are what’s wrong with America today. As I watched the video Kaufman reminded me of a gay rights advocate.

They say they're just "good ol' boys" who, like the song goes, were "never meaning no harm." But three Bloomington Kennedy seniors were not allowed to attend their commencement Wednesday night after bringing a Confederate flag to school on Tuesday.

"We're all big fans of the Dukes of Hazard," said Dan Fredin, who was suspended, along with Joe Snyder and Justin Thompson. "It's just us showing we have our own style and we aren't going to conform to whatever anyone else thinks."

School officials say at least one of the students waved and carried the flag in the parking lot.

The boys argue they never took the flags off their trucks, but they admit they brought them to the school.

Officials asked the students to remove the flags. Eventually, all three students were suspended for three days -- which, in this case, included graduation.

Officials say a Student Code of Conduct prohibits behavior that may provoke or offend other students.

"We are very clear that the Confederate flag is a symbol of hatred, bigotry and racism," said Rick Kaufman, the Executive Director of Community Relations at Bloomington Kennedy High School.

"It's truly unfortunate that the bad decision they made will prevent them from walking across the stage in graduation," Kaufman said adding that the school has dealt with students bringing confederate flags to school before.

But the students argue the punishment doesn't fit the crime. They say they show the flag as a sign of rebellion, not racism.

"The confederate army was in rebellion to the U.S. Army who were about money and power," Fredin said. "We never took it as racial or anything like that."

Meantime, the American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota said the students would likely not have a case in court.

"If the authorities can make the claim that the presence of the flag can reasonably disrupt the educational process than they can censor it," said Charles Samuelson with the ACLU of Minnesota.

The three students will still receive their diplomas. Already they have plans for next year, which for two of them, includes serving in the U.S. military.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

They said themselves that it was to demonstrate rebellion. This indicates knowledge that it was inappropriate for the setting. Sorry, but they knew what they were doing and that it would have consequences.

"we aren't going to conform to whatever anyone else thinks"

Yeah, OK. Say that in boot camp.

I have no issue with the Confederate flag, but I do have sense enough to not use it as a means of protesting the establishment. No rights violated here. This issue has been covered in school handbooks and they were well aware that it was unacceptable.
Originally posted by flotown79:
This was never the flag of the Confederacy.
Please research the flags and you will find the three that flew. Those were the flags for "pride"

The boy is holding a Confederate Navy Jack, a rectangular version of the square Confederate Battle Flag. While never one of the "official" Confederate flags, it was flown by the Confederate Navy from 1863 till the end of hostilities, and has come to be accepted as in the 20th and 21st centuries as a "Confederate" flag.
Originally posted by FirenzeVeritas:
How about a swastika? That was originally, among other things, a Hindu symbol to promote good luck and keep away witches. Should students be allowed to carry one of those also? Things changes. It's better in this life to promote what good one can do rather than demand rights to do what is perceived as evil.

Absolutely. If they display it as a Hindu good luck symbol, or a Navajo whirling wind symbol. If they promote it as part of Nazi-ism, or white supremacy, then no. The flag in question is but an inanimate object. In itself, it has no power to offend. And if you're suggesting we restrict or limit their intent, you've just joined the "thought police".

Or would it be acceptable for Amish to say they are offended by things like cars and cell phones, so those things should be banished because are, according to their creed, evil?

Add Reply


Untitled Document
Link copied to your clipboard.