I've been ready to ask my second question of Bill in his attempt to "tutor" me for quite a while now. Bill finally, after much dancing around the issue, confirmed that he believes that Jesus and God continue to work here on earth and in heaven. For some reason he equates "working" with the passive states of omnipresence, omnipotence, and omnisience, but whatever. Here is what Bill has confirmed that he believes.
This is what we have so far:
1. Once save, always saved.
2. The Bible is to be taken literally except for obvious uses of metaphors, simile and symbolism.
3. Everything in the New Testament, including all of Paul's writing, is God's word to us, straight from God, and God doesn't change his mind.
4. If someone willfully disobeys the Bible, then they were never Christians, and still aren't.
5. God and Jesus are omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent and continue to work here on earth and in heaven.
So, here is the question, Bill.
Leviticus and the other Mosaic books set out numerous laws that readers of the Bible are to follow. You claim that these laws have been superseded and no longer apply to Christians. You claim that Jesus has now "fulfilled" the laws and that that means they no longer apply (with one notable exception which is irrelevant here, so don't go off on it).
I question your interpretation of Matthew 5:17-18.
17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. 18 For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
Heaven and earth have not disappeared, so a literal reading of the Bible says that the laws are still in effect. A thirty paragraph dissertation of twisted logic will not explain away this simple statement by Jesus. He makes this statement to a mass of people, simple people, most who probably couldn't even read or write.
You will try to point to some of Paul's writings, but let's face it, Jesus trumps Paul; and introducing conflicting verses while trying to say they don't conflict is just bad logic.
The next thing you are going to say is that Jesus "accomplished" everything when he was crucified and said "it is done". But as you have already stated, Jesus continues to work here on earth and in heaven, so he and his work continue, all is not accomplished.
Now, just for fun, let's say that Paul does trump Jesus in your mind:
Paul himself believed in keeping the Law:
Acts 24:14 (NKJV) "But this I confess to you, that according to the Way which they call a sect, so I worship the Elohim of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the Law and in the Prophets.
Acts 25:8 (NKJV) while he answered for himself, "Neither against the Law of the Jews, nor against the temple, nor against Caesar have I offended in anything at all."
Acts 18:21 (NKJV) but took leave of them, saying, "I must by all means keep this coming feast in Jerusalem; but I will return again to you, Yahweh willing." And he sailed from Ephesus.
Romans 7:25 (NKJV) I thank Yahweh--through Yahushua the Messiah our Master! So then, with the mind I myself serve the Law of Yahweh, but with the flesh the Law of sin.
Romans 7:12 (NKJV) Thereforethe Law [is] holy, and the commandment holy and just and good
So, the question is, if the Bible is to be taken literally, shouldn't you be following the Mosaic laws, just as Jesus tells us we should? Or was Jesus wrong?