http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t...s/article4476877.ece
I remember seeing this woman (the rapist) on Tom Snyder. There's certainly a resemblance, not to mention same last name.
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
It certainly appears to be the same woman.
It's the same woman, she's wanted in TN for something as well. Saw it on the news yesterday morning, very creepy person.
She attempted to steal money with which to purchase an artifical limb for her horse. (I don't make this up, folks.) Apparently the state of Tennessee isn't going to have her extradited. I wonder where she got the 50K for the cloning.
"She was accused of kidnapping and sexually assaulting the 17-stone Kirk Anderson, a Mormon missionary, who had become the object of her passionate affections."
After apparently failing to persuade him to marry her and father her children she then seems to have forced him to have sex with her.
Maybe some of you can enlighten me, but how can a man be raped?
Seems he would have to be "in the mood" first, so how could that be considered rape?
After apparently failing to persuade him to marry her and father her children she then seems to have forced him to have sex with her.
Maybe some of you can enlighten me, but how can a man be raped?
Seems he would have to be "in the mood" first, so how could that be considered rape?
She followed him to the UK, kidnapped him, and bound him. Then she discovered what has long been a rumor: Mormon men on mission trips wear a chastity belt. She removed the impediment and "teased" him until he was ready to perform.
I've heard of forward women, but she wins the prize...
I've heard of forward women, but she wins the prize...
quote:Originally posted by FirenzeVeritas:
She removed the impediment and "teased" him until he was ready to perform.
I don't see how it could be called rape if he "performed".
quote:Originally posted by Taciturn:
I don't see how it could be called rape if he "performed".
I suppose your argument could be used for female rape victims if they exhibited any of the physiological responses associated with consentual sex. "Well, she became aroused... she must have wanted it."
Wiki explains it well: "Non statutory female on male rape is widely, but incorrectly, considered impossible because male erectile response is seen as voluntary, when, in fact, it is involuntary. [3][4] Fear, anger, anxiety, and non-arousal have been cited as factors in being unable to obtain an erection. [2][5] Therefore, male victims of rape by females [6] often face social, political, and legal double standards. [7] Though studies show otherwise [8], female rapists are usually seen as less culpable than male rapists by the courts due to these misunderstandings."
If she was arrested in '77 wouldn't there be fingerprints on file to compare with the current woman?
And they sure look like the same woman.
And they sure look like the same woman.
quote:Originally posted by Bob Dole:quote:Originally posted by Taciturn:
I don't see how it could be called rape if he "performed".
I suppose your argument could be used for female rape victims if they exhibited any of the physiological responses associated with consentual sex. "Well, she became aroused... she must have wanted it."
Wiki explains it well: "Non statutory female on male rape is widely, but incorrectly, considered impossible because male erectile response is seen as voluntary, when, in fact, it is involuntary. [3][4] Fear, anger, anxiety, and non-arousal have been cited as factors in being unable to obtain an erection. [2][5] Therefore, male victims of rape by females [6] often face social, political, and legal double standards. [7] Though studies show otherwise [8], female rapists are usually seen as less culpable than male rapists by the courts due to these misunderstandings."
I work with several quadriplegic patients. Even though bodily sensations are not transmitted to the brain through the spinal column, they are transmitted to the spine. When bathing or even changing a diaper for a sleeping patient, there is evidence of arousal. Certainly a bound captive could be "raped."
quote:Originally posted by Taciturn:
I don't see how it could be called rape if he "performed".
quote:Originally posted by Bob Dole:
I suppose your argument could be used for female rape victims if they exhibited any of the physiological responses associated with consentual sex. "Well, she became aroused... she must have wanted it."
Wiki explains it well: "Non statutory female on male rape is widely, but incorrectly, considered impossible because male erectile response is seen as voluntary, when, in fact, it is involuntary. [3][4] Fear, anger, anxiety, and non-arousal have been cited as factors in being unable to obtain an erection. [2][5] Therefore, male victims of rape by females [6] often face social, political, and legal double standards. [7] Though studies show otherwise [8], female rapists are usually seen as less culpable than male rapists by the courts due to these misunderstandings."
No argument from me, just my opinion.
As for female rape victims & your statement of "Well, she became aroused... she must have wanted it.", I'm sure there are lawyers that have or will use that defense.
I have a friend that was raped & almost beaten to death, and she didn't become aroused.
quote:Originally posted by FirenzeVeritas:
I work with several quadriplegic patients. Even though bodily sensations are not transmitted to the brain through the spinal column, they are transmitted to the spine. When bathing or even changing a diaper for a sleeping patient, there is evidence of arousal. Certainly a bound captive could be "raped."
Aroused, probably so, but could he perform the act? Probably not. My point being that a man with a normal sexual appetite, once aroused, would perform the sexual act.
Regardless he was 17 yoa, and bound. He was forced to have sex with this woman. Why couldn't he have been forced to perform the act?
I'd be a little more interested in a horse with a wooden leg or whatever. What was that about? At least to the extent she would have to steal to get one?