Skip to main content

Howard Caplan, host of The Traffick Report Show and Infowars guest, asked Bill Clinton about the 26 flights he took on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet the Lolita Express.

While attending a Bill Clinton speaking event, Caplan interrupted and shouted, “Why did you fly on Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express 26 times? What were you doing on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane?”

The crowd began booing immediately and Caplan was escorted out of the building.

Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s Lolita Express at least 26 times according to flight logs and the billionaire sex offender had 21 phone numbers for Bill.

Listed directly under “President William J. Clinton” is Kevin Spacey who has been accused of molesting multiple people, including underage boys.

Infowars is orchestrating a protest for Bill Clinton’s upcoming visit to Austin, Texas on June 10.

Ex-Secret Service agent Dan Bongino previously threatened to release information on Bill Clinton’s Lolita Express flights where he is rumored to have had sexual relations with underage individuals.

 

In April, Infowars wrote about Caplan confronting Joe Biden over his inappropriate touching of young girls on CSPAN.

 

In the video below Infowars reporter Rob Dew interviews Caplan about his Joe Biden confrontation.

 

In July of 2017, Caplan was allegedly assaulted by a group of men who targeted him over his support for President Trump.

 

https://www.infowars.com/man-c...eins-lolita-express/

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Pelosi, dumber than a black brick...

When will Democrats finally attempt to figure out what is wrong with Nancy Pelosi?

(Infowars) – Maybe now we know why politicians in Washington, D.C. can’t seem to get a handle on the national debt: They struggle with simple math.

During her weekly press conference today, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi froze as she attempted to do a simple math problem in her head.

Pelosi suffered her usual brain freezes and face spasms.

After having trouble saying “prescription drug prices,” she confused the debt with the deficit.

“The president was going to reduce the debt, the Republicans were going to reduce the deficit, reduce the national debt,” she said.

“The Republicans are meeting on immigration,” she said moments later, calling illegal immigrants “patriotic,” continuing, “Lord knows what will come out of that — hopefully the Lord knows,” throwing her hands into the air.

“We’re been praying very hard on it.”

Then she had trouble with numbers.

Believing Democrats will be successful in the November elections, she said she’s like to “also point out the intensity factor that is out there. Democrats are maybe 15 points, something like 63 to, um,” she said trailing off and staring at reporters.

A voice off camera, either an aide or a reporter jumped in with “47.”

“47, is it?” she said in response.

Never mind it should have been 48.

“I’ve had concerns about China in three areas,” she said moments later. “Uh, the, certainly the disparate, the,” she said before pausing and staring. “Our trade deficit with China which is enormous,” she continued.

Fumbling her China analogy, she said, “We have to ride the drag— the China tiger,” before having trouble saying “shining.”

“The prac— fact is,” she said later, before getting tongue-tied trying to say “wages rising.”

“It’s about rages, uh, wages rising in our country,” Pelosi said.

Her final face spasm of the appearance came as she tried to say “consumer confidence.”

When will Democrats finally attempt to figure out what is wrong with Nancy Pelosi?

https://www.teaparty.org/video...wrong-answer-308301/

I, personally, wouldn't be too comfortable if Alex Jones was my chief source of information, however, there is enough evidence out there to indicate that Clinton did, indeed, take many of these flights aboard this man's plane.  That alone doesn't condemn the man or mean he partook in activities that would be considered illegal or wrong but given Bill Clinton's track record he surely doesn't have the character and background that would make you dismiss such charges or accusations.  

I think there's probably enough politicians on both sides that would not want information about Jeffery Epstein's flights or passenger list to get out into the public.  I don't doubt that there were activities that people would rather remain secret that took place quite often aboard the flights and on the private islands that these celebrities and politicians received invitations to.  I think Americans would be horrified at the amount of corruption that goes on in our Nation and Government on both sides of the aisle and I believe that both parties and groups of politicians count on there being a great number of supporters who refuse to believe that people and politicians in their own party could be guilty of such and dismiss such accusations out of hand.

.   

gbrk posted:

I, personally, wouldn't be too comfortable if Alex Jones was my chief source of information, however, there is enough evidence out there to indicate that Clinton did, indeed, take many of these flights aboard this man's plane.  That alone doesn't condemn the man or mean he partook in activities that would be considered illegal or wrong but given Bill Clinton's track record he surely doesn't have the character and background that would make you dismiss such charges or accusations.  

I think there's probably enough politicians on both sides that would not want information about Jeffery Epstein's flights or passenger list to get out into the public.  I don't doubt that there were activities that people would rather remain secret that took place quite often aboard the flights and on the private islands that these celebrities and politicians received invitations to.  I think Americans would be horrified at the amount of corruption that goes on in our Nation and Government on both sides of the aisle and I believe that both parties and groups of politicians count on there being a great number of supporters who refuse to believe that people and politicians in their own party could be guilty of such and dismiss such accusations out of hand.

.   

Given that Trump was a good friend and made comments about such and how 'young' Epstein liked his women and attended parties of Epstein's, right up until the investigations started, it seems strange for Republicans to just ignore the connection to Trump and rail about the connection to Clinton. Kinda hypocritical, don't you think.

I think if there is evidence of abuses BY ANYONE they should be made known if there is evidence of such.  One thing, though, flies in the face of what you are trying to imply.  If you are trying to say Trump should be investigated for activities related to Epstein because they had to do with underage girls then where is your evidence or proof of that other than wishful thinking?  

Although it's totally circumstantial, if that, there is evidence that Trump did not participate in any of these things.  That evidence is in the lack of reporting on it as happening.   There is NO WAY that the press today, the mainstream media, with all those that are seething with anger and resentment toward Trump would cover up a story like that.  If there was any connection between Trump and Epstein it would have been a great many years ago when Trump was actually more a Democrat than Republican and was financially, supporting Democratic candidates and causes.  It's amusing how Trump was so great and liked (by Democrats and the media) while he was supporting them and their causes and being beneficial to their pockets.  Let Trump change to Republican causes and run as a Republican and this once fawned over person becomes the scum of the earth.  

I'm sorry but I believe the lack of media news about what you are implying is reason enough to disregard it as hearsay and fabrication or the stuff of liberal wet dreams.  Trump has always been a man that has appreciated beauty in women as evidenced by those whom he has chosen to marry in the past or whom he has dated.  As for treating women fairly, he has also done that putting many women in top positions within his companies.  Trump has been totally unbiased in his treatment of people and promoted based on who could make him the most money.  He didn't care if they were male, female, black, white, red, whatever as long as they were successful he used them and promoted them and put them in positions of leadership.  If Trump had any flaws or problems as many in the media as there are that hate him, it would have come out.  That alone should be evidence enough (after a year plus) that there is nothing there.  The only reason President Kennedy got away with all his indiscretions was his relationship with a fawning and doting media who hung on his every word and action.  Nixon had no such relationship and the media crucified him and led to his resignation.  Clinton had an adoring media as well that, along with a Senate majority, protected him from being removed from office after his impeachment vote in the House.  Trump has no such relationship with the media or those in the media, in fact, Trump has just the opposite.  Trump's swimming in a pool of media sharks that all seek his demise and want to see him impeached.  If there was the slightest bit of anything it would be reported and would be before the American public daily in the news.

 

Last edited by gbrk
gbrk posted:

I think if there is evidence of abuses BY ANYONE they should be made known if there is evidence of such.  One thing, though, flies in the face of what you are trying to imply.  If you are trying to say Trump should be investigated for activities related to Epstein because they had to do with underage girls then where is your evidence or proof of that other than wishful thinking?  

Although it's totally circumstantial, if that, there is evidence that Trump did not participate in any of these things.  That evidence is in the lack of reporting on it as happening.   There is NO WAY that the press today, the mainstream media, with all those that are seething with anger and resentment toward Trump would cover up a story like that.  If there was any connection between Trump and Epstein it would have been a great many years ago when Trump was actually more a Democrat than Republican and was financially, supporting Democratic candidates and causes.  It's amusing how Trump was so great and liked (by Democrats and the media) while he was supporting them and their causes and being beneficial to their pockets.  Let Trump change to Republican causes and run as a Republican and this once fawned over person becomes the scum of the earth.  

I'm sorry but I believe the lack of media news about what you are implying is reason enough to disregard it as hearsay and fabrication or the stuff of liberal wet dreams.  Trump has always been a man that has appreciated beauty in women as evidenced by those whom he has chosen to marry in the past or whom he has dated.  As for treating women fairly, he has also done that putting many women in top positions within his companies.  Trump has been totally unbiased in his treatment of people and promoted based on who could make him the most money.  He didn't care if they were male, female, black, white, red, whatever as long as they were successful he used them and promoted them and put them in positions of leadership.  If Trump had any flaws or problems as many in the media as there are that hate him, it would have come out.  That alone should be evidence enough (after a year plus) that there is nothing there.  The only reason President Kennedy got away with all his indiscretions was his relationship with a fawning and doting media who hung on his every word and action.  Nixon had no such relationship and the media crucified him and led to his resignation.  Clinton had an adoring media as well that, along with a Senate majority, protected him from being removed from office after his impeachment vote in the House.  Trump has no such relationship with the media or those in the media, in fact, Trump has just the opposite.  Trump's swimming in a pool of media sharks that all seek his demise and want to see him impeached.  If there was the slightest bit of anything it would be reported and would be before the American public daily in the news.

 

If only there were numerous news sources backing my claim. Gosh, I wish there were a half dozen or so to support the accusations. I wonder what Republicans would do if those stories existed linking Epstein to Trump.

 

https://www.snopes.com/news/20...-trump-rape-lawsuit/

http://www.newsweek.com/donald...ims-roy-moore-713531

http://nymag.com/daily/intelli...onduct-accusers.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.com...ae1fe4b0162c043a7212

https://www.politico.com/story...x-trafficking-237983

Last edited by Br’er Rabbit
Kraven posted:

Howard Caplan, host of The Traffick Report Show and Infowars guest, asked Bill Clinton about the 26 flights he took on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet the Lolita Express.

While attending a Bill Clinton speaking event, Caplan interrupted and shouted, “Why did you fly on Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express 26 times? What were you doing on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane?”

The crowd began booing immediately and Caplan was escorted out of the building.

Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s Lolita Express at least 26 times according to flight logs and the billionaire sex offender had 21 phone numbers for Bill.

Listed directly under “President William J. Clinton” is Kevin Spacey who has been accused of molesting multiple people, including underage boys.

Infowars is orchestrating a protest for Bill Clinton’s upcoming visit to Austin, Texas on June 10.

Ex-Secret Service agent Dan Bongino previously threatened to release information on Bill Clinton’s Lolita Express flights where he is rumored to have had sexual relations with underage individuals.

 

In April, Infowars wrote about Caplan confronting Joe Biden over his inappropriate touching of young girls on CSPAN.

 

In the video below Infowars reporter Rob Dew interviews Caplan about his Joe Biden confrontation.

 

In July of 2017, Caplan was allegedly assaulted by a group of men who targeted him over his support for President Trump.

 

https://www.infowars.com/man-c...eins-lolita-express/

I love that first picture of Clinton. Do you remember what he was seeing that caused that look on his face? LOL! 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×