Skip to main content

This is how Bloombergs group would have you deal with someone attacking you with an axe handle -

 

Matthews: Would you consider the guy with the ax handle armed or not?

Glaze:  Well, not with a gun.

Matthews:  No, would you call him -- well, I call him armed.

Glaze:  Well, I have a word for him, I have a word for him. I grew up in Colorado where my dad was a gun dealer, and a guy who shoots somebody who has anything other than a gun when they could have done something else like talk or fight with their fists --

Matthews:  Well, how do you talk to a guy with an ax handle? How do you talk to a guy with an ax handle?

Glaze: Well, you fight him. You run away. You deescalate the situation. I mean, that`s the way it was.

 

http://www.nraila.org/news-iss...on-self-defense.aspx

Beam me up, Scotty, there's no intelligent life here......

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:

I guess it would depend on the situation if you had a clear way to evade the attacker and no one else involved then retreat.  If no way to escape or other family members in danger eliminate the threat.


"Glaze argued that unless an assailant is armed with a firearm, the victim absolutely has no right to preserve their life by using one of their own."

 

Sounds to me that Glaze believes no one should ever protect themselves against anyone who doesn't have a gun themselves. 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×