Now we know..or do we?

Bulldog63Hall of Famer

Seems that the President's Chief of Staff is saying he is responsible for the President not going to France to join in unity with other world leaders against the terrorist acts. So that makes me wonder just who is pulling the stings on Obama? If he is suppose to be the smartest person to occupy the oval office, according to the Liberals, then why can't he accept any responsibility for his actions. The Chief of Staff may have not recommended he go but the President is the one who made the decision not to go. So another fall guy thrown under the bus. Who is next? Michelle?

1/20/159:47 AM

❤️ 0

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

ContendahOld Faithful

Originally Posted by Bulldog63:

________

A person who does not seek, weigh, and decide on a critical course of action at least partially on the basis of advice from trusted associates or subordinates is a person who has an exaggerated sense of his own wisdom. This principle applies no less to Presidents than to others faced with difficult decisions.

In this case

1/20/1510:24 AM

❤️ 0

gbrkOld Faithful

Those who voted for Obama, re-elected him, and still trust in him are surely the most gullible, most hypocritical or just most uninformed people possible. Even from the first election, especially the media, if the Republicans or a Republican President had done anything this man has done or that this administration has been associated with their would be calls and clambering for impeachment yet they are so willing to look the other way as if nothing ever happened.

This is and has been the least media investigated, reported on, or criticized President in all of our nation's history! Whatever the reason it's to our nation's detriment. Of course as with any political, or any other post it's my opinion only.

1/20/153:27 PM

❤️ 0