Skip to main content

The 'assassination' of two NYPD cops Saturday comes as the city is rife with tension. Police officials say Mayor Bill de Blasio set the tone for the shootings by siding with protesters in the Eric Garner case.

The violence that lead to the deaths of two New York police officers Saturday was blind.

At 2:47 p.m., authorities say, a young black man angry at the police killings of Michael Brown and Eric Garner stepped onto a Brooklyn street corner to take his revenge. He men he killed were Officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos – a man who had just been married two months before, and father of two described by a friend as "an amazing man. He was the best father and husband and friend."

Amid a debate over police diversity, these two were an Asian and a Latino. Amid a debate over police brutality, these two were eating lunch, according to one report

The man connected to the Saturday's attacks, Ismaayil Brinsley, shot his girlfriend in the stomach earlier in the day, police say, and had warrants in Atlanta for probation violations related to theft, firearm possession, and criminal property damage charges. He committed suicide Saturday when police cornered him.

Calling the shootings an "assassination," New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said: "It is an attack on all of us."

But in the hours after the shooting, the tensions that have increasingly presented a picture of a New York divided rose to the surface.

As Mayor de Blasio approached the podium to make his statement Saturday, cops turned their backs to him. After de Blasio spoke, police union chief Pat Lynch declared: "There's blood on many hands tonight. That blood on the hands starts at City Hall in the Office of the Mayor."

The mayor, many police officials say, has betrayed them. He has not stood beside them as protesters have taken to the streets since the grand jury decision not to indict a police officer in Mr. Garner's death by an illegal chokehold. Worse, the mayor said in a press conference after the Garner grand jury decision that he has told his biracial son to "take special care" during police encounters.

Some police had circulated a petition to request that de Blasio not come to their funeral if they were killed in the line of duty. 

Meanwhile, outside the hospital where the two cops had been brought Saturday, one Daily Beast reporter heard expletives yelled at the police and talked to a local man who said that some people were saying, "Serves them right because you mistreat people!"

The emotions in New York are raw.

Police are saying, "I told you so."

"Unfortunately, I don't believe anyone connected to law enforcement is surprised this happened," Gary McLhinney, a negotiator for police unions, told The Washington Post. "When our leaders make statements that encourage lawlessness and demean an entire profession, this is the result."

Supporters have started a #BlueLivesMatter hashtag, playing off the #BlackLivesMatter hashtag that sprung from the Brown case in Ferguson, Mo. Others started a New York counterprotest, wearing T-shirts that read "I can breathe" – playing off the "I can't breathe" T-shirts that have become a symbol of pro-Garner protests.

But for one resident of the Brooklyn community where Saturday's tragedy happened, choosing between support for the police and support for the protests was a false choice.

"Now we have two families that's missing someone from the holidays," she told New York's WABC-TV. "Where's your sense of humanity?"

The Rev. Al Sharpton, the man at the center of the Garner and Brown protests, who many police supporters see as an irresponsible rabble-rouser, said on Saturday: "Any use of the names of Eric Garner and Michael Brown, in connection with any violence or killing of police, is reprehensible and against the pursuit of justice in both cases."

Between the visceral points of concern for police violence and concern for police safety are many difficult questions – honest questions about latent racism, and honest questions about out-of-control violence in some communities. Nineteenth-century abolitionist Frederick Douglass said people who wished to reach racial harmony without asking tough questions are "people who want crops without plowing the ground."

Officers Liu and Ramos were not the face of that debate. They had nothing to do with Brown or Garner or the tide of events into which they were eventually swept.

But perhaps now they will be that face.

If Garner and Brown came to symbolize to a part of America the need to address the sometimes-dehumanizing way in which blacks are viewed, then perhaps Liu and Ramos will come symbolize what police have done right, and how much they are called to sacrifice to keep others safe.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/nypd-amb...aving-141701306.html

 

 

The bobble headed racist pos speaks. What a stinking hypocrite. This is exactly what he wants!!!

 

The Rev. Al Sharpton, the man at the center of the Garner and Brown protests, who many police supporters see as an irresponsible rabble-rouser, said on Saturday: "Any use of the names of Eric Garner and Michael Brown, in connection with any violence or killing of police, is reprehensible and against the pursuit of justice in both cases."

 

 

 

Last edited by Bestworking
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Paul          53 minutes ago         

         

          Black lives matter! Which ones? Only the criminals who are killed by police? How about the hundreds who are killed in Chicago? Don’t they matter? An innocent child killed by a drive by shooting, they don’t matter? Where is the outrage, Sharpton? Why are you and Jesse Jackson not in Chicago, marching for an end to black violence? Afraid to go there?  I don’t blame you. Those people are dangerous! Of course, those are blacks killing blacks, and in your eyes that is OK.  A black thug kills an innocent child. No problem. Nothing to get excited about. Happens every day. RIGHT? A black criminal is killed by police and that is outrageous, we will burn the place down. Isn’t that your MO? That’s what keeps you and Al in spending money, right Jesse? If your black brothers and sisters would tar and feather you two and ride you out of town on a rail, it would solve a lot of their problems. You two are no better than vultures, preying on your own people. Cannibals! Vengeance is Mine, sayethe the Lord, and I will repay. You two should be afraid, very afraid.

Originally Posted by direstraits:

Sharpton's rent-a-mob chanting "kill the cops," and no one thinks nothing bad will happen...?  in the early seventies, it was "Off the pigs."  Feel like I've walked into the same horror movie, only a worse remake.  The true wages of progressivism. 

============================================

By Michelle Conlin

(Reuters) - On December 13, as thousands of protesters mobbed the New York streets, Yuseff Hamm, an NYPD police officer, was monitoring the demonstrations from a mobile command unit near the Brooklyn Bridge. As the protest drew near, Hamm and his fellow officers could hear the chants of the noisy throngs:  “What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want them? Now.”

 

 

 “When you have a chant going on like that, and no one addresses it, and then a week later, these killings come to fruition, I’m shaken,” said Hamm, an African American, whose usual stint is in the conditions unit in the 106th precinct in Queens. “The rhetoric that’s going around, left unchecked, is very dangerous, and it invites people to do crazy nonsense.”

http://news.yahoo.com/wake-pol...-edge-225958080.html

Last edited by Bestworking

At the press conference, the police turned their backs on Comrade de Blasio.  The mayor's response:  

“It’s unfortunate that in a time of great tragedy, some would resort to irresponsible, overheated rhetoric that angers and divides people,” de Blasio spokesman Marti Adams said in a statement following the union leaders’ remarks."

 

http://dailycaller.com/2014/12...-their-backs-on-him/

 

From a mayor who brought in Al Sharpton, this response reaches even further heights of stupidity and cupidity. 

 

Originally Posted by Crash.Override:

and here we have all the rt. wingnuts politicizing a tragedy for their own agenda.. much like they accuse the democrats of doing.

 

 

Not Letting Another Crisis Go To Waste.  In the wake of the Arizona killings, knee-jerk Democrats want to crack down on free speech and place more limits on gun ownership.  All of this because a single man out of 310 million with no links to conservatives or talk radio allegedly goes mad.

 

Taking advantage of tragedy.  True to Rahm's Rule of never letting a good crisis go to waste, liberal pundits and Democratic politicians are consciously exploiting Saturday's tragic shooting in Tucson for political gain.

'Pin This on the Tea Partiers'.  [Scroll down]  MSNBC political commentator Keith Olbermann even had the chutzpah to go on air Saturday night [1/8/2011] and call for rhetorical restraint in politics while simultaneously demanding that Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly of Fox News offer "solemn apologies" for giving "oxygen to those deep in madness to whom violence is an acceptable solution."  Politico.com quoted one veteran Democratic operative saying that the Obama White House should use the tragedy to score political points.  "They need to deftly pin this on the tea partiers," he said.  "Just like the Clinton White House deftly pinned the Oklahoma City bombing on the militia and anti-government people."

The Left Is Not About To Waste This 'Crisis'.  Theme:  The left's immediate reaction to the Arizona shooting proves, again, that it will not forgo any chance to exploit a tragedy ("crisis").  Minor theme:  In the process, mostly through projection of its own perversions, it is setting records for hypocrisy, irrationality and unfairness.  Politico reported that after the shootings, one veteran Democratic operative said that President Obama should "deftly pin this on the tea partiers.  Just like the Clinton White House deftly pinned the Oklahoma City bombing on the militia and anti-government people."

Sanders Fundraises Off Arizona Murders.  There has been no shortage of individuals and institutions that have sought to capitalize on the shootings in Tucson.  Add Vermont senator Bernie Sanders to that list.  This afternoon [1/11/2011] Sanders sent out a fundraising appeal, seeking to raise money to fight Republicans and other "right-wing reactionaries" responsible for the climate that led to the shooting.

The Gun Control Push.  America's new least favorite mayor, Michael Bloomberg of snow-covered New York City, complained that "the law says drug abusers can't buy guns.  Even though Jared Loughner was rejected by the military for drug use and arrested on drug charges, he was able to pass a background check and buy a gun."  Wait, hold up a second.  "The law says drug abusers can't buy guns?"  Well, then how the heck did Loughner get one?

Arizona Lawman Acting Stupidly, Obama Silent.  Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik ascribed blame in a murder case to radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh — thereby labeling him an accomplice — while conceding he has no proof. ... Sheriff Dupnik last April publicly stated he would order his deputies not to enforce Arizona S.B. 1070 because it is a "racist" law.  After the Safeway massacre, he proclaimed his own state a "Mecca for racism and bigotry" without having any facts.

The Bias Against Guns:  The certainties we can expect are life, death, weather patterns ... and the old media always exploiting a tragedy involving a firearm into a call for gun control.  To wit, two days after the Tucson tragedy, The Washington Post ran an editorial with this headline:  "Gun control:  It's not a political impossibility."

Frank Rich Still Trying To Blame Right For AZ Shootings.  Like Rahm Emanuel, who didn't to waste a crisis, Frank Rich doesn't want to let a murderous rampage pass without trying to wring political advantage.  By now, even most ardent liberals have had to admit that there was no nexus between conservatives and the manifestly psychotic AZ shooter.  But there was Rich, in his New York Times column of this morning, still bitterly clinging to the accusation.

Journalists urged caution after Ft. Hood, now race to blame Palin after Arizona shootings.  [CNN,] the network that had shown such caution in discussing the Ft. Hood shootings openly discussed the possibility that Loughner was inspired to violence by... Sarah Palin.  Although there is no evidence that Loughner was in any way influenced by Palin, CNN was filled with speculation about the former Alaska governor.

 

 

 

 

"He has not stood beside them as protesters have taken to the streets since the grand jury decision not to indict a police officer in Mr. Garner's death by an illegal chokehold. Worse, the mayor said in a press conference after the Garner grand jury decision that he has told his biracial son to "take special care" during police encounters."

 

So....the Mayor of the city should stand by a police officer who killed a man while using an illegal chokehold and by not doing so he caused the death of two innocent police officers. Yeah, that makes sense...

 

Laying the blame on the Mayor for this crime is like laying the blame on ALL police officers when one of them does something illegal or wrong. You guys can't have it both ways. Its either wrong or not. I personally don't blame ALL police officers for the brutality of a few. I put the blame only on those that commit the crimes and those that allow them to walk free from punishment.  If we want to see change we have to uphold the laws equally. That means if a police officer breaks the law he gets the same punishment anyone else would. Not given a freebie and support just because he wears a badge. If a civilian kills someone while committing a crime they are charge with murder. Why should police not be held to the same standard? The article actually points out that the police officer that killed Eric Garner was using an illegal chokehold, yet it goes on to question why the Mayor wouldn't support such action! That is just ridiculous.

 

Can anyone show me where the Mayor said anything that would actually incite people to kill or do harm to police officers? It has to be something other than he doesn't agree with the the grand jury, or that he rightfully told his son to be careful when dealing with police officers. That is just good parenting. I told my sons the same thing growing up. I told them to be respectful, and do not give them any reason to arrest you. Do not argue and do not resist if they do arrest you. If it is unjust we will take it up in a court of law. Am I to blame for these police officers murder too?

 

 

DeBlasio opposes making police choke holds illegal

 

http://nypost.com/2014/09/10/d...-chokeholds-illegal/

 

Simply put, the choke hold "may be" against NYPD policy.  I say "may be" because the above story make me wonder, but the grand jury has no legal authority to indict based on policy.

 

What may be against policy in one department may be permissible in another department.  The policy of one does not make the act illegal in another or an illegal act within its own.

 

The media has so much invested in the use of "choke hold" that they can not divest themselves of it.  When the autopsy revealed that Garner DID NOT DIE as a result of a choke hold, the media spent no more than a couple of days explaining why this was so and now here we are again.

 

Talk about low info.

Last edited by budsfarm

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×