Skip to main content

I've seen this before, but it really makes me think about who I'm not voting for for president.

Very interesting and something that should be considered in your choice.



If you do not ever forward anything else, please forward this to

all your contacts...this is very scarey to think of what lies ahead of

us here in our own United States...better heed this and pray about it

and share it.

We checked this out on 'snopes.com'. It is factual.

Check for yourself.



Who is Barack Obama?



Probable U. S. presidential candidate, Barack Hussein

Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.,

a black MUSLIM from Nyangoma-Kogel, Kenya and Ann Dunham, a white

ATHIEST from Wichita, Kansas.

Obama's parents met at the University of Hawaii. When

Obama was two years old, his parents divorced. His father returned

to Kenya. His mother then married Lolo Soetoro, a RADICAL Muslim from

Indonesia.? When Obama was! 6 years old, the family relocated to

Indonesia. Obama attended a MUSLIM school in Jakarta. He also

spent two years in a Catholic school.

Obama takes great care to conceal the fact that he is a

Muslim. He is quick to point out that, 'He was once a Muslim, but

that he also attended Catholic school.'

Obama's political handlers are attempting to make it appear that?

Obama's introduction to Islam came via his father, and that this

influence was temporary at best. In reality, the senior Obama

returned to Kenya soon after the divorce, and never again had any

direct influence over his son's education.

Lolo Soetoro, the second husband of Obama's mother, Ann

Dunham, introduced his stepson to Islam. Obama was enrolled in a

Wahabi school in Jakarta.

Wahabism is the RADICAL teaching that is followed by the

Muslim terrorists who are now waging Jihad against the western

world. Since it is politically expedient to be a CHRISTIAN when seeking

major public office in the United States, Barack Hussein Obama has

joined the United Church of Christ in an attempt to downplay his Muslim

background. ALSO, keep in mind that when he was sworn into office he

DID NOT use the Holy Bible, but instead the Koran.

Let us all remain alert concerning Obama's expected

presidential candidacy.



The Muslims have said they plan on destroying the US

from the inside out, what better way to start than at the highest

level - through the President of the United States, one of their own!!!!

Please forward to everyone you know. Would you want this

man leading our country?...... NOT ME!!!
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Photobucket
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It is funny that this sorry racist email is still going around quoting snopes when snopes says it is fake. As far as the pledge I'll take a smart pragmatic president over one who obsesses over insignificant stuff. We have a current president who loves the pledge and prays all the time. How's that working out?
The truth about Obama is bad enough. He's a junior congresscritter with as much experience as Hillary. Which is completely inadequate for high public office. We're all aware of Hillary's missteps on Pakistan; does Obama even know where it is? Ron Paul is a loon, the republican candidates are complete losers, and the democrats are even worse. Maybe we could outsource the presidency to India.
I am undecided on who I am voting for, and usually lean toward the right, but to single a person out for being Muslim or being linked to the Islamic faith is just out right absurd. You are linking every Muslim with the extremist side, which is laughable because people act like Muslims are the only people that have ever harmed anyone. There are extreme Christians that harm others all of the time. Muslim teaching (except the extremist) are about good and very similar to the Christian teachings. Please judge people for themselves and not for some rumors or the bad apples that CLAIM to be members of a certain group.
I checked this site out and it seems to be true. Which would be OK with me but IF a white candidate of any persuasion belonged to an exclusive all white church committed to all white purposes he would be castigated, tarred and feathered by the other candidates of both parties, the press and wouldn't have a prayer of being elected except in a few places in Louisiana.





Obama mentioned his church during his appearance with Oprah. It's the Trinity Church of Christ. I found this interesting and you will too.

Obama's church:
Please read and go to this church's website and read what is written there. It is very alarming. Barack Obama is a member of this church and is running for President of the U.S. If you look at the first page of their website, you will learn that this congregation has a non-negotiable commitment to Africa. No where is AMERICA even mentioned. Notice too, what color you will need to be if you should want to join Obama's church... B-L-A-C-K!!!

Doesn't look like his choice of religion has improved much over his former Muslim upbringing?
Are you aware that Obama's middle name is Mohammed? Strip away his nice looks, the big smile and smooth talk and what do you get? Certainly a racist, as plainly defined by the stated position of his church! And possibly a covert worshiper of the Muslim faith, even today. This guy desires to rule over America
while his loyalty is totally vested in a Black Africa?

I cannot believe this has not been all over the TV and newspapers. This is why it is so important to pass this message along to all of our family & friends. To think that Obama has even the slightest chance in the run for the presidency, is really scary.
Click on the link below:
This is the web page for the church Barack Obama belongs to: www.tucc.org/about.htm
Enter this web address and read the information provided by this church.

=
quote:
Originally posted by zippadeedoodah:
The truth about Obama is bad enough. He's a junior congresscritter with as much experience as Hillary. Which is completely inadequate for high public office. We're all aware of Hillary's missteps on Pakistan; does Obama even know where it is? Ron Paul is a loon, the republican candidates are complete losers, and the democrats are even worse. Maybe we could outsource the presidency to India.


why do you think Ron Paul is a loon? Research the dollar and see where it comes from. Why is there a need to have a big central government controlling every aspect of our lives? He is the only top-line candidate that is pushing for radical change to our foreign policy and big government spending. Everybody else, whether democrat or republican are nothing more than puppets in place by there corporate sponsors, to dictate more control over individuals until the bulk of the nation is enslaved.
America at this point in history needs real change- and learn from recent 8 years of mistakes. This coupled with the new congress that chooses NO change or the same old same old. The US needs a maverick – anyone who has the n*ts to take or at least try to lead us in a new direction! You and I know what the republicans and democrat parties will give you, that’s why I’m looking to get out of this repetitive no end highway and look for a new perspective.
If you think the republican or democratic parties have helped you- think of your families and their future. This 2 party system has had its day- a new direction is needed.
I urge all of you to look at this viewpoint and vote this way.
quote:
Originally posted by indopus:
quote:
Originally posted by zippadeedoodah:
The truth about Obama is bad enough. He's a junior congresscritter with as much experience as Hillary. Which is completely inadequate for high public office. We're all aware of Hillary's missteps on Pakistan; does Obama even know where it is? Ron Paul is a loon, the republican candidates are complete losers, and the democrats are even worse. Maybe we could outsource the presidency to India.


why do you think Ron Paul is a loon? Research the dollar and see where it comes from. Why is there a need to have a big central government controlling every aspect of our lives? He is the only top-line candidate that is pushing for radical change to our foreign policy and big government spending. Everybody else, whether democrat or republican are nothing more than puppets in place by there corporate sponsors, to dictate more control over individuals until the bulk of the nation is enslaved.


Ron Paul's domestic laissez faire approach is wonderful for domestic affairs, but is unworkable to the point of psychotic in international affairs. His approach to foreign affairs is about three hundred years too late. International relations is defined by "schoolyard rules". Pretending they don't exist or ignoring them, as Dr. Paul does, is the classical definition of "stupid".
Apparently your grasp of realpolitik is as tenuous as that of Ron Paul. He has forgotten, and apparently you have never learned, that the world has become smaller and more interwoven over the past 300 years or so. It's analogous to the diver, when being attacked by the vicious man-eating shark, closes his eyes since, he figures, "if I can't see the shark, then he can't see me."

If we could put Ron Paul in charge of completely domestic policies, I'd say good. But we need an actual adult in charge of foreign affairs.
quote:
Originally posted by beternU:
Uh, zippedeedumdum:

Your posting of that irresponsible material is odious and retrograde.

Obama is not a Muslim and it has been well established that he is not. The tripe and trash you posted is old and false garbage and you should be ashamed for rummaging it up from the pile of dung where it originated.


Check out your sources. All I said was that Obama was a junior congresscritter with a tenuous grasp on geography. If you want to live up to your name, get your facts right. Retrograde? Do you even know what that means?
Zippadeedoodah & others- with the mess “w” had so gratefully left us in during his tenure- now “even a caveman can do it”! "W" better thank God there's not one running, his popularity numbers would surely be better...
Ron Paul himself speaks a straight , no nonsense type of language instead of the same old, wore out promises, and trying to impress me speeches.
This maverick is the one we need in office. If you have someone in mind with a mindset to really change the thinking of Capitol Hill and win the confidence back of the citizens of the US- this is what is needed! Think for yourself people- don’t let a two party candidate do it for you.
Look around and see what the USA needs for its betterment- not individual profit!!! The rest will fall in place.
Senator Obama's first two names are Barak Hussein. They are Arabic names. Barak is congnate with the Hebrew word "Baruch" which means "Blessed" and Hussein merely means "Handsome."

In Islam, Hussein is used by both Sunni and Shia, but the Shia have a special attachment to the name, as they do Ali. However, we have to recall that the late King of Jordan was named Hussein and he is a direct descendant of the last Sharif of Mekkah, and a Sunni! Saddam Hussein, as we know, was a Sunni.
Barak Obama was named by his Kenyan father, who had been raised in the Muslim faith, but according to Sen. Obama was an atheist by the time he met his wife, Sen. Obama's mother.

Arabic names mean only that they are Arabic names, that is to say, Arabic does not equal Moslem. There are Christians and even Jews and Baha'is and Druze and Mandeans, etc. who have Arabic names. Paula Abdul? Is she Muslim? No, she is Jewish. Abdullah Sassoon Muslim? Nope, he was Jewish. Their families hailed from Arabic speaking lands.

Sen. Obama did not fail to salute the flag; he followed the protocol and uncovered his hat (he wasn't wearing one) and stood upright and joined in singing the National Anthem. If one cannot see the flag, then one cannot salute it, which is what one does as it is presented or one passes by in uniform.

Pick on his politics and not what his parents named him already!
quote:
Originally posted by zippadeedoodah:
Apparently your grasp of realpolitik is as tenuous as that of Ron Paul. He has forgotten, and apparently you have never learned, that the world has become smaller and more interwoven over the past 300 years or so. It's analogous to the diver, when being attacked by the vicious man-eating shark, closes his eyes since, he figures, "if I can't see the shark, then he can't see me."

If we could put Ron Paul in charge of completely domestic policies, I'd say good. But we need an actual adult in charge of foreign affairs.


Here is an example of our current foriegn policy in the middle east. Most may not want to believe this but this is the reality. The US invades Iraq and Afghanistan to control to flow of oil. Afghanistan to pipe into the caspian sea, and iraq to get the black gold that just bubles to the surface naturally. The US government enforses there policy in a soverign nation to try and limit the amount of oil the rest of the world gets. Hence "China". Well it aint working! Simply because to build an empire you have to have an almost unlimited amount of money. So now the war is costing so much that we are borrowing from china, the same country we were trying to gain control of resources. If we were to pull out of Iraq now, it would be split between Iran and the Saudis. Iran would most definetly sell the oil at a much cheaper rate, thus causing the Saudis to start selling there oil cheaper. So it looks like to me that the price would lower on oil. And if they invade isreal... hmm does it really matter to me? No not really, isreal has an army, they can take care of it better than we could. So lets save our money and try to get our dollar back to a stong level with free trade rather than do this or we will drop a million dollar bomb on you.
indopus,

The Afdghanistan UNOCAL pipeline was for natural gas, not oil. Plans for that are long abandoned as you need peace for such enterprises. There's no empire planned. Spheres of influence, perhaps. Its a lot easier to just buy oil from Iraq, than invade the place and messup the infrastructure. Sorry, the empire argument just doesn't pass the logic test. But, nor does much of the left's outdated 19th century zeropean philosophies.
quote:
Originally posted by Howard Roark:
indopus,

The Afdghanistan UNOCAL pipeline was for natural gas, not oil. Plans for that are long abandoned as you need peace for such enterprises. There's no empire planned. Spheres of influence, perhaps. Its a lot easier to just buy oil from Iraq, than invade the place and messup the infrastructure. Sorry, the empire argument just doesn't pass the logic test. But, nor does much of the left's outdated 19th century zeropean philosophies.


sorry, let me refine my post that says oil, as I meant to say "natural resources", "fossil fuels", or anything that is a limited resource that is used for energy.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×