Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I'm sorry, but I cannot get myself to read more about O'Bamacare.  Not only is this administration going to destroy the medical community, but he's also going to destroy the insurance industry which has been in a fine balance for many years.

 

I'd just hate to be a 50 year old physician knowing that I'd have to put up with O'Bamacare for the next 10-15 years because I still have not repaid all my student loans.  That's what I call slave labor.

Quaildog, I have a BCBS of GA policy that does not meet Obamacare mandates.  It will go out in Oct. 2014,  it has a $3,500. deductible and cost over $700.00 per month.  (in Alabama, I had Blue Cross with a 750 deductible and cost me only  428. a month.)  The closest I have seen on the government website to mine is a 7,500.00 deductible and will cost close to $1,200 per month.  I of course will qualify for  a subsidy, but I have never asked anyone to help pay my way, nor do I plan to.  It is not your or anyone elses responsiblity to help pay my insurance. (And please don't come back with school, roads, etc. that we all pay into to keep running.) So I am looking at alternatives.  So just because you have never heard of  a BCBS policy that doesn't meet the mandates, doesn't mean it isn't true.

Originally Posted by Bamaman1:

I'm sorry, but I cannot get myself to read more about O'Bamacare.  Not only is this administration going to destroy the medical community, but he's also going to destroy the insurance industry which has been in a fine balance for many years.

 

I'd just hate to be a 50 year old physician knowing that I'd have to put up with O'Bamacare for the next 10-15 years because I still have not repaid all my student loans.  That's what I call slave labor.

If you are 50 and still have not paid back your loans then I hardly think Obamacare is the problem not that I have any love for obamacare.

Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by Bamaman1:

I'm sorry, but I cannot get myself to read more about O'Bamacare.  Not only is this administration going to destroy the medical community, but he's also going to destroy the insurance industry which has been in a fine balance for many years.

 

I'd just hate to be a 50 year old physician knowing that I'd have to put up with O'Bamacare for the next 10-15 years because I still have not repaid all my student loans.  That's what I call slave labor.

If you are 50 and still have not paid back your loans then I hardly think Obamacare is the problem not that I have any love for obamacare.

__________________

 

ding, ding, ding... we have a winner!

Yeah, well if you knew the truth you might be surprised. How long does it take to pay back $300K at 8% that can flucuate based on the market? Of course I am not living at home in my momma's basement, but that would be easier I guess. Not everyone graduates medical school before they are 30, and few finsih residency before that.

You union scholars might think it is easy to do so, but I had friends who were 40 when we entered residency.  You don't get to pay back the loans during that time, and probably half of the people who go to medical school are not wealthy enough to have that kind of money laying around.

It would probably surprise you to know just how many docs are still paying off these loans.

BTW, they are immune from Chapter solvency, so claiming bankruptcy won't help you either.

No one gave me a silver spoon, nor provides benefits since I am self employed.

Ironically I had a fellow classmate who entered medical school at the age of 45.  She must have really wanted to be a doctor, since she would have been close to 53 when she finished her residency.  No she works in a small family practice clinic in WV.

 

 

Sorry HF, but again you don't have much of a clue as to what you are talking about.  I applaud your flight training and being able to pay it back, but again like I said medical school loans are a bit different than typical school loans.  And like I said earlier physicians who are self employed pay their own benefits and taxes and retirement like any other small business. And if you paid as much to be a pilot as it costs to go to medical school you defintely over invested in you education.

And what difference does it make if someone wanted to go to medical school at 43?  I started when I was 25, but I spent 5 years after medical school in a speciality residency before i could sit for the board exams.  It takes time to go thru the system.

HF, I guess it is all in what you want to do.  I got my flying license for about $5000.  I see all the time where I could go become an ATP for $50K.  Again it is what you want to do.  Did not say it was a good investment, is what you are taught at Embry Riddle that much different than any other flight shcool?.  My complaint is that a person can spend $300K going to medical school and have to work 60 hours a week to make ends meet and maintain their office staff.  They have to build a practice, did you buy the airliner and pay the flight attendents?.  Meanwhile, the federal government and the insurance industry dictates to them (physicians) what they will charge and what the comapnies will pay. In the mean time the government passes laws that tells you how you must see a patient and what hoops you have to jump thru to do it.  you on the other hand have a union to back you up, negotiate your payments and secure your benefits.  i beleive in another thread you commented onhow necessary they were for you profession.  Guess what, the government says doctors cannot have a union, that way it would be illegal for them to negotiate collectively.

See you might borrow $100K to become a ATC/ATP but in return you get to determine how you practice that craft. A phsycian who spends 12-15 years in training and spends $25$-$300K is told to take 60% of what they will pay and shut the hell up. And you wonder why it takes them 20 years to pay it back?

And as far as making a mistake, I don't know too many doctors that will tell you if they had an opportunity to do something else they would not do it.  The paperwork and regulations make it a PITA, not so much the people you get to take care of.

Teyates,

 

You seem to understand that a union is a good thing for their members. Otherwise you wouldn't be upset that you can't take part in one. Yet in the other thread you said they are not needed. Which is it?

 

Were you not aware of all the things you said in your last post before you became a Dr? If not, why not? If so, then it was the choice you made. We all wish we could charge whatever amount we wanted for our services. We all wish we could get paid more and be able to easily pay off our debts. What makes you anymore special than the rest of the citizens in this country? 

 

The guy working on a construction crew that owes 100k for a mortgage, has 2 kids that he is trying to save money to send to college, has a car payment or two, being an American he probably owes quite a bit in medical bills too. Especially since he has a couple of kids. So he might say its not fair either that he is not making enough to pay off all that before he is 50. He works really hard, everyday, out in the elements doing back breaking work at that. He also has overhead cost that he will pay regardless of his loans or debts. He will always have to pay for utilities, taxes and food. Guess what?....he makes a tiny fraction of what you do. Its not right that the company he works for makes millions of dollars in profit each year and his wages have barely gone up in the last 10 years. Its not right that the market dictates that he make so little all while he is destroying his physical health working a job that will more than likely disable him by the time he is in his 50's. Right? 

 

I am really trying to work up some sympathy for you, I really am. 

 

 

Jank, that construction worker's low salary is NOT a fair issue, it's a CHOICE issue. You know that word lefties use day in and day about everything they want to be right in the world. Well,  what you and other Dems fail to see in this is that construction worker made the CHOICE early in his career to be just that, a construction worker. He knew well before going into the career what the market salary range was for that job, union or non-union. Let's also go back to why would he be sending his kids to college. Most blue collar workers do this because they want their kids to have a better life financially than their own lives have been. My biggest beef with the progressive ideaology is that someone else should pay for their poor judgement, mistakes, etc. in their life. And for that, I call B.S.! Sleep in the bed you've made!

So Practical, you apparently think teyates has some kind of special right to ***** and complain that his job doesn't pay enough to pay his debts off, but a blue collar worker does not. Is that right?

 

I didn't bring up that line of argument. One of your conservative fellows did. A Dr. no less. Life is just so unfair to him. Even though he made the choice to become a Dr. Even though he knew the cost of becoming a Dr. Even though he knew the income he could expect. Yet, you don't see a thing wrong with his rant on the subject. 

 

Gotcha. 

 

Not everyone can be a Dr. Not everyone is college material either. If you are not someone that does well academically then you have little choice in what kind of work you do. I have never met a blue collar worker that chose hard labor over a professional career. Have you?

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×