Skip to main content

Sports Illustrated's Stewart Mandel, comparing the allegations about Miami with the case of USC:

 

"And now, here's where the two cases differed: USC's involved one football (Bush) and one basketball (Mayo) player. Yahoo's report implicates 73 athletes over an eight-year span, though Shapiro claims he gave impermissible benefits to 72.

 

The bagmen in the USC case did most of their dirty work in San Diego, far from the campus itself. Shapiro was an active Miami booster, so coveted for his donations he got to lead the team out of the tunnel, sit in the press box on game days, and had a lounge named in his honor.

 

And for all the hubbub over the Bush case, at the end of the day, USC gained no competitive advantage in football due to its running back's extra benefits. Miami, on the other hand, had assistant coaches allegedly arranging for recruits to meet Shapiro on their visits. On the basketball side, he allegedly paid $10,000 in 2007 explicitly to land a recruit, DeQuan Jones.

 

If USC got a two-year bowl ban and 30 docked scholarships, what should Miami get for an encyclopedia of allegations so tawdry as to make USC look like a bubble-gum shoplifter? Can you ban a team from the postseason for a decade? Can you take away 90 scholarships? Not likely. All that's seemingly left is the biggie -- the death penalty -- and it's entirely possible: Miami qualifies as a repeat violator for any violations before Feb. 27, 2008, stemming from it mid-90s Pell Grant scandal. But the NCAA hasn't gone there in 25 years.


Once again, the NCAA's entire enforcement process is under the microscope -- just a week after president Mark Emmert promised sweeping changes. The Committee on Infractions notoriously shows little-to-no consistency or adherence to precedent in issuing its verdicts, but Dee himself painted his former employer into a corner on this one. If you're going to rake one school over the coals for a single player's impermissible benefits, your entire credibility is at stake if you don't raise the consequences exponentially for a case involving 73."

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.c...x.html?sct=cf_t12_a6

 

Should be interesting to see what happens.  Please vote below.



Last edited by TheMeInTeam
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Coaches and the people that give this stuff to the kids should be the ones fined AND some sort of charges filed against those who allow this. If coaches get those fat paychecks cut and the "Boosters" get put in jail, This would all but stop.  Dont hurt the kids playing now for what others did a few years ago. Go after the money of these people and watch them run away. state or feds should have the right to charge those for breaking NCAA rules.

 

 

University athletic  programs are inherently vulnerable to the kinds of things that reportedly went on at Miami, for two principal reasons:

 

1) Boosters, like the filthy rich clown (and jailbird)  who is at the heart of this mess are all but impossible to control.  Universities are held accountable and punishable for the illicit actions of these nefarious jerks, even though there is no practical way for them to pre-emptively regulate such actions.  

 

2) Many of the athletes recruited for university athletic programs are from poor families that can offer them little financial support.  They are thrown in with thousands of other students from much more financially secure families, who are provided with fashionable clothing, cars, ample spending money and other benefits that the athlete from an underprivileged background is unable to secure. The temptation to accept some of these emoluments from boosters is all but impossible for some of these kids to resist.

 

And yes, I know that the athlete from an impoverished home situation is very fortunate indeed to have his room, books, tuition and food furnished by the university and should be thankful for that, and for the opportunity (albeit one that very few will realize) of going on to really big bucks as a professional athlete.  But those big bucks, even if they ultimately come, will not help offset the disparities in daily quality of life between that athlete and the sons and daughters of privilege.

 

Now the question:  Just how can these issues be systematically addressed and resolved?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kind of off topic, but if Miami ends up getting the death penalty, I wonder if the resulting weaker ACC would make it more likely for a school like FSU, Clemson, or Virginia Tech to make the jump to the SEC along with Texas A&M.  VT and A&M would be pretty much ideal as far as expanding TV markets, but there are plenty of ACC schools (or maybe even West Virginia from the Big East) that the SEC could potentially poach to keep the divisions even if A&M joins.  I would like that a lot better than taking another Big 12 school and moving Alabama and Auburn to the East, because I think that would make the East way too strong.

Last edited by TheMeInTeam

If this booster is doing 20 years and ratting out the whole world to get out early, how worthy of belief is he? You are not gonna give the school the death penalty based on this informants testimony! He would likely talk about his mother if you gave him the chance. He is doing the old "talk and walk" but that does'nt make him credible.

Originally Posted by renecillo7:

If this booster is doing 20 years and ratting out the whole world to get out early, how worthy of belief is he? You are not gonna give the school the death penalty based on this informants testimony! He would likely talk about his mother if you gave him the chance. He is doing the old "talk and walk" but that does'nt make him credible.

****

 

The NCAA has been investigating the matter  for 5 months. If there had been nothing to it, it would seem that they could have wrapped it up by now.

Anyone who thinks that all the NCAA has is this one guy's word should click over to Yahoo and look through all the corroborating sources and evidence they dug up.  Here's the page on Devin Hester, for example, and the links to everyone else alleged to have been involved are on the right side of the page.  Besides providing improper benefits, it's pretty clearly established that he induced Miami players to sign with the sports agency he co-owned.  Also keep in mind that NCAA enforcement isn't a courtroom and that the burden of proof isn't the same.  I don't think there's any question in the NCAA investigators' minds that some serious violations were going on, so the penalty that Miami ultimately receives will likely come down to how much the investigators can prove that the coaches and administrators knew about what was going on,

NCAA violations are exposed by people with an axe to grind all the time.  Phil Fulmer wasn't exactly a neutral party in the Albert Means scandal, and Lloyd Lake sued Reggie Bush because Bush didn't pay him back for all the gifts he received while he was still playing for USC.  Yes, sometimes scandals are exposed by a reporter or by someone involved coming clean, but other times it's clearly by someone looking to bring down a program or individual.  Just because Shapiro has an axe to grind doesn't mean he's lying, and if he is, it's an incredibly elaborate lie with all those pictures, phone records, and credit card statements.

Like I said, it will probably come down to how much the coaches and administrators knew, which is a harder thing to prove than just that violations occurred.  But the NCAA has punished programs in the past for what the coaches should have known whether they can prove they knew or not, and it seems pretty clear to me that there was what the NCAA calls a "lack of institutional control" at Miami on a larger scale than just about anything since SMU.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×