Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

HIFLYER2 posted:
jtdavis posted:

Why didn't you let them handle it in the first place instead of letting Gowdy spend 100 million checking on it?

It simply boggles my mind that you continue to defend Clinton after all the questionable at best "I believe illegal" decisions and actions I really cannot understand. 

The lure of free stuff is so strong that clinton/demoslop supporters will overlook anything! The sleazier they are, the better the gimmethats like their politicians. All any lefty politician has to do is tell them they will "take from the nasty rich" and give it to them, and they will vote for the devil himself, and to **** with the country. They have no interest in the future of the country, it's all about what they can get given to them.

budsfarm posted:
jtdavis posted:

To whom does the "them" refer to?

The one who hacked her.

Politifact rates Hillary as the most honest of all the presidential candidates.  Deal with it.

Who’s Checking the Fact Checkers?

http://www.usnews.com/opinion/...-against-republicans

Do your own homework.

Jt never researches anything. He just runs with it, and then he "drops" it when he's proven wrong, just to bring it up again later on, just to be proven wrong once again, and again, waits to bring it up again. That's his "game". What he gets out of it I don't know. Come to think of it, all the demoslops use that "game" to keep their lies circulating.

Last edited by Bestworking
Stanky posted:
jtdavis posted:

Why didn't you let them handle it in the first place instead of letting Gowdy spend 100 million checking on it?

I believe the liberal way of handling things is to hide the evidence until it bloats and then floats to the surface and then call it an overblown right-wing conspiracy. 

Good one. Just like the VRWC put bill's **** in monica's mouth. Remember that? LOL!

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×