Skip to main content

Deep is drunk he sez: That which makes us human is our ability to discern reality, in other words , "truth". We are not entitled to our own truths.

He always seems to think he is entitled to his.

Reality he says? No one has yet been able to answer that question decisively.

He sez: A set of data can only come to one truthful conclusion. He has no idea about ‘superposition’. ‘relativity’ or the uncertainty principle.

Deep sez: ‘Not only that, but we know the truth intuitively’

No science can't explain intuition for what is, it’s capabilities certainly cannot predict the future. One’s intuition is often wrong and untruthful.

Deep sez: Part of this intuition is the utter lack of any sort of evidence for it.

Intuition has parts? One of which is a lack of something? He just claimed intuition is how we know the truth, so why do we waste money on scientific discovery in expensive laboratories?

“deep sez: Regarding your transforming experience, I admit they happen. I suspect, as do others, that they occur most often when someone needs an excuse to ignore the difficulties of life. Sometimes they occur when one realizes that life is finite and temporary, and one would like more. We must admit, that transformative experiences occur in all religions and philosophies. That makes it a human, psychological phenomenon, not the voice of God“. deep that is a lot of claims as to human behavior. You made those up didn’t you?

Deep sez: ‘It's my guess that you are a Christian because you want to be a good person. My dear, you are a good person, regardless. It's time everyone knows that one need not religion to be good.’ Now his treatise on human behavior is just a guess.

 

 

He is afraid of me because I catch him in lies but he has been told it is ok to lie in the interest of atheism by non other than scott what’s his name that Kyle Butt sent home from the debate at Norton Auditorium with his ass and hat in his hand.

Originally Posted by vplee123:
Wow I just can't get it right- curse you autocorrect!!! Faith is BELIEF in the absence of PROOF

My dear friend,

 

I understand.  Faith is belief in the absence of proof.

This is a disgusting and inhuman concept.  I submit that faith is the permission that otherwise intelligent adults give each other to accept nonsense. Nonsense that is not only without evidence to support it, but nonsense that has perfectly good evidence against it.
I know you are a Catholic, and we will discuss Transubstantiation elsewhere, but regard your Creationists neighbors.  They profess to believe that the Universe is 6000 years oldl
They are insane.  Bonkers.  Termites in the windmills of their minds.  Batspit crazy.
Yet the have "faith" that they are right.  They embarrass faith.  They make it worthless.

Yet, only to a degree more than any other faith.

As a mental exercise, substitute "pretend" for "faith" in any discussion..  The conlcusions won't be different.


And there is nothing I can do to change your mind about that, my dear. But, I do believe- of course not in a 6000 year old earth, but I do believe in God. Have felt the breath of the Holy Spirit, and have felt the presence of Jesus with me. I know that my life on earth is of little consequence to anyone else. And I await the life to come;-) Faith is not something I can prove, but I can feel, and I do KNOW. We are at a crossroads in this conversation because I can't teach you to believe in God any more than you could convince me that He does not exist. So, we just enjoy the dialogue, and respectfully disagree. And you know that if ever you wanted to discuss faith, I'd be willing, and I respect your opinions. But, dont adopt them and never will. I expect you feel the same way. So we can just go have an amber Bach together and call it a day...;

Deep darlin’ if your stayin’ awake concern is someone believing in the 6000 year limit for the equation you are nuts. We can easily argue that the age has not yet reached 1 and we are on a journey to it but are in an unknown position before 1.  We know the speed of light is just that and nothing else. It’s simply the ‘speed of light. Nothing else has that speed. Just light has that speed. The equation E=mc^2 is many times written as E=m without using the c^2 because for certain equations the speed of light is simply stated as being 1.

  Let’s say an arbitrary number of 6000 is selected as a limit. Due to the target accuracy being argued is 13.85 b/yrs and cannot be measured at the 6000 yr point, no matter what the age the answer can never be other than 6000. The age of the universe can be anything. Given the rest mass of the universe + it's mass due to  velocity is so large the acceleration for 13.85 b/years makes it near the infinite mass of even a single particle with rest mass other than zero measured near the speed-0-lite. We don't know how old it is.

Prince Albert, Bills latest statement that "there are more Christian believers among Protestants than among Catholics is the topic here. We are awaiting references, study citation or statistics to see where he came up with this "fact". I assure you, that's NOT in the bible. Now, Bill, you made that "factual" statement. Show us the references or any data to indicate that is anything but your opinion. Even just an author of the study will do- I can google it. Awaiting your reply to this very specific question.
And price Albert, this is not about bill gray- this is a statement presented as fact. All I want is the references by which this conclusion was reached. It has nothing to so with my personal feelings about Bill Gray. But? One of his favorite lines is "as they say in Missouri, Show me!!! Show me your studies and references that prove that statement. Or tell me that you cannot do that, and that you lied. It's just that simple. I don't plan to back down- I want to know where you got your statistics.
Originally Posted by prince albert:

I know that just about everyone this Forum hates Bill Gray, but I will say that most of what Bill Gray says is the truth,  I don't agree with everything he says but most of it can be proved by the Bible.

_______

From what you just posted, you must believe Bill Gray to be a Christian?!? It amazes me that anyone that has ever read the Bible & knows the difference between Satan & God would even hint that Bill is what the Bible refers to as a Christian. Amazing!!!

 

Depends on what denomination/doctrine the proof comes from. One doctrine could prove it one way, another doctrine prove it a different way, who's correct?

Originally Posted by vplee123:
And there is nothing I can do to change your mind about that, my dear. But, I do believe- of course not in a 6000 year old earth, but I do believe in God. Have felt the breath of the Holy Spirit, and have felt the presence of Jesus with me. I know that my life on earth is of little consequence to anyone else. And I await the life to come;-) Faith is not something I can prove, but I can feel, and I do KNOW. We are at a crossroads in this conversation because I can't teach you to believe in God any more than you could convince me that He does not exist. So, we just enjoy the dialogue, and respectfully disagree. And you know that if ever you wanted to discuss faith, I'd be willing, and I respect your opinions. But, dont adopt them and never will. I expect you feel the same way. So we can just go have an amber Bach together and call it a day...;

 

Veedear  I cannot hesitate to warn you . DF is a non- gregarious and  vain Jackdaw with no other purpose than to maneuver  himself into your affections with borrowed feathers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T...in_Borrowed_Feathers .  He is covetous of that jewel God placed in you as a heart and he would take what he was never made to enjoy; that thing that is so precious to you, your faith in God. [Behavior of the Jackdaw][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackdaw

You are probably right- Bill, I've asked repeatedly for you to cite references to back up your statement that there "are more Christian believers in the Protestant churches than there are in Catholic Church. Can you not do this? Then are you able to state how you know this? Or were you assuming, lying or just making things up. Please address this, for the sake of your own integrity- are you able to back your statement up, or was it an opinion.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×