Skip to main content

Rush Limbaugh Calling For Riots In Denver

DENVER -- Talk show host Rush Limbaugh is sparking controversy again after he made comments calling for riots in Denver during the Democratic National Convention this summer.

He said the riots would ensure a Democrat is not elected as president, and his listeners have a responsibility to make sure it happens.

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/15980105/detail.html
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

JJP,

As I don't listen to Limbaugh, I had to go to his website to seek an anwer. As usual, the left and MSM got it wrong.

From a transcript of his radio show:

RUSH: We don't burn our cars. We don't burn down our houses. We don't kill our children. We don't do half the things the American left does. We need the American left -- and this is another great thing about Operation Chaos; nothing to do with my ego. We need as many ignorant Americans to wake up and find out exactly who the modern-day Democrat Party is as dominated by the far left in this country. We need that to be seen. Now, I am not inspiring or inciting riots. I'm dreaming. (singing to the tune of White Christmas) "I'm dreaming of riots in Denver." Remember 1968? And which party did that? It was the radicals in that party, the anti-war radicals, the same bunch of clowns that are running around defining the Democrat Party today. What the world thinks of us? There was an analogy just this week about somebody in the world. I'm drawing a mental blank about this. But the fact is that the Democrat Party has members in it that have already said, "There will be riots," or something to that effect. Al Sharpton.

He was throwing down the gauntlet to the superdelegates: "You take this election away from Barack Obama, and there's gonna be trouble. There's going to be trouble in Denver." As for the rest of the world and what they think of us, you know, there's nothing that frustrates me more than to hear that. What part of the world do we care about? What part of the world do we want approval from? Do we want approval from the Europeans who have gone so **** wussy that they cannot -- they could not if they had to -- mount a military defense of themselves if they were attacked? Not even with NATO, because it has been allowed to lapse. Is it those people that we want the approval from? Do we want approval from people like Robert Mugabe? Do we want approval from some of the warlords and terrorists of Al-Qaeda? Who in the world do we want approval from? Do we want approval from Hamas, like Jimmy Carter does? We have the approval of our allies. We have the approval of the UK. We have the approval of the Australians. Do we want the approval of the Chinese? Do we want the approval of Kim Jong Il.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_042308/content/01125112.guest.html

He was quoting Al Sharpton and stating the contrast between a democratic convention/three ring circus/freak show versus a republican convention!
rush was not calling for riots, he was calling for chaos and predicting riots in the dem. (dim) party. there is something called 'context'. you've got him mixed up w/ al sharpton who said if things don't go the right way there would be riots in denver similar to the '68 convention. you shouldn't take the word of the media, but you should listen to rush or if that's too difficult, go on his site and read the transcript.
Actually the only ones to riot in Chicago in 1968 were the police who attacked and beat peaceful demonstrators, news people and innocent bystanders who were watching.

The Democratic Party is currently controlled by the Corporate Democrats who are not much different then Republicans.

And yes we do care what other countries think and how our actions affect them and the world.

I am not sure I understand, Why is he supposedly quoting Sharpton?
The protesters in the Chicago Streets were peaceful, it was the Police that rioted. It was covered on TV and I watched it happen on a hot August night.

They were protesting an illegal war, the draft and the support for the war by the Democratic Party and the exclusion of the anti war people. The voting age was 21 at that time.

I am unfamiliar with this new group but we can see many similarities with 1968. The US waging an illegal war and occupation and an unresponsive government to the will of the majority of the people.
Hi Pogo,

You say, "The protesters in the Chicago Streets were peaceful, it was the Police that rioted. It was covered on TV and I watched it happen on a hot August night. They were protesting an illegal war, the draft and the support for the war by the Democratic Party and the exclusion of the anti war people. The voting age was 21 at that time. I am unfamiliar with this new group but we can see many similarities with 1968. The US waging an illegal war and occupation and an unresponsive government to the will of the majority of the people."

Just curious, Pogo. You say you watched it on television. Just how old were you? Did you really understand what was happening -- or are your comments just retreads of what your liberal college professors have told you?

Do you even know who the Chicago Seven (originally Chicago Eight before Bobby Seale, leader of the Black Panthers was separated for a separate trial) were; why they were arrested; and why they were tried for inciting a riot at the 1968 Democratic Convention? What was Bobby Seale doing with this group of protesters? He fit in perfectly; for they truly were in Chicago to cause a riot.

Let me give you a few excerpts from the book "A Taste Of Power" by Elaine Brown, who took over militant leadership of the Black Panthers when her lover, Huey Newton, and Bobby Seale were in exile or in jail:

"I have all the guns and all the money. I can withstand challenge from without and within. Am I right, Comrade?"

"Together we're going to take this city. We will make it a base of revolution. The pigs will look at us and wonder. They will look at us, but they will not be able to deal with us."


These excerpts were from her speech at a nationwide Black Panther Party meeting calling for revolution in all our major cities. Notice that all members were called "Comrade." Does this happen to ring any bells in your head?

If Bobby Seale was in the tight little group rioting in Chicago in 1968 -- you can be sure that many more Black Panthers were also there. Add to that, leaders such as Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, and others -- how can you say that it was the Chicago police who caused the riots? Yes, the Chicago police reacted to the riot; and not always in the best way. But, no -- the police did not cause the riots -- the Black Panther mentality is what caused the 1968 Chicago riot.

As I said, forget what your liberal college professors taught you -- and get into the real world. None of the defendants in the Chicago Seven trial were in Chicago to make a better world, to stop the war, or any other such noble cause. They were there, plain and simple, to start a riot and disrupt the Democratic Convention.

Or, maybe you can say that they were there to stop the "war-mongering" Democrats. I am old enough to remember those years. Hubert Humphrey was nominated, saying that he would continue Lyndon Johnson's policies in Vietnam.

In 1964, Lyndon Johnson was nominated on the Democratic Party ticket. That day, I reregistered Republican. Johnson ran against conservative Republican Barry Goldwater. When asked about the war in Vietnam; Goldwater honestly told the people, "Yes, I will escalate the war so that we can end it sooner."

Good old Lyndon told folks, "No, I won't escalate that war. I will bring our boys home right away." Does this sound somewhat familiar? Can anyone recall Mrs. Billy Bob or Osama Obama making such statements? Is this a case of deja vu or what?

And, as soon as Johnson won the election -- he greatly escalated the Vietnam War -- more troops, more bombing, more everything. This was the legacy he left when he decided to not run for a second term -- leaving Humphrey to pick up the pieces. Consequently, Humphrey was seen as a war-monger when compared to George McGovern. And, Richard Nixon won the national election.

Yes, the country was divided by the war; yes, people wanted to see this long, drawn out war ended. Who were our presidents during the Vietnam War? It started with John Kennedy (Dem), escalated under Lyndon Johnson (Dem), and finally Richard Nixon (Rep) ended the war and brought our troops and POWs home.

The Vietnam War lasted 15 years, with 58,000 Americans killed. That averages almost 3900 Americans killed each year for 15 years. And, people are complaining that the war in Iraq has cost us 4000 American lives in 5 years of war. That is 800 per year for the War Against Terror in Iraq -- and 3900 per year, for 15 years, for the war in Vietnam.

Oh, by the way, did you know that the final ballot at that 1968 Democratic Nominating Convention gave Bear Bryant more votes than it did George Wallace? Yep, there names were there. Just a bit of trivia.

Pogo, before start jumping up and down blaming all the world evils on Republicans, Christians, and everyone else with whom you disagree -- get your facts straight.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill Gray
billdory@pacbell.net

Alabama bred,
California fed,
Blessed by God to be a Christian American!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Apathy-Header-2
Hello Bill:
Thanks for the respectful reply. Sorry for the late reply but I was busy and didn't get to check this thread until now.

To begin with I do have my facts straight. In 1968 I was 18 years old and had graduated high school back in that June. I was watching the convention and it was late, like 11, 12 or even 1 in the morning when the news interrupted the speeches to go to "breaking news" on the street. They showed demonstrators marching and signing in front of the convention center and walls of cops surrounding them when suddenly the Police just attacked the demonstrators. It was right on TV.

They attacked and beat anyone in the street and it was covered live. They beat demonstrators, newspeople and by standers and was reported as such in the news then and for the following weeks. It is the Right Wing which rewrites history.

I do remember the Chicago 8 and I remember William Kuntsler was the lead lawyer and the judge was Julius Hoffman, no relation to Abby Hoffman. I remember the famous picture of Hoffman and Jerry Rubin standing back to back in Judges robs. Bobby Seale was bound and gagged at the trial because he had nothing to do with the Chicago 8 and continually objected to being tied in to the group. He was dragged into the trial because it was an attempt by the Nixon administration to silence all dissent. They were all found not guilty.

The word Comrade means "friend" or comrade, a "Fellow Traveler" in this context. The Black Panthers were started as a self empowerment group in the Ghetto that provided breakfast and lunch programs and tried to organize Blacks to gain political power. They had after school sports and reading and other activities to help the community. The inner city schools were under funded and poorly run.

Much like today Police continually shot, beat and framed Black people and never pay any consequences. The Black community was tired of it. The Panthers armed themselves in "Self Defense." Chicago Panther leader Fred Hampton was shot as in slept in bed in a Police raid. J Edgar Hoover saw the Black movements as threats to the white power structure and launched a program called COINITEL which infiltrated and caused dissension among the group, shot or framed others to break up various black groups. They bugged Martin Luther King and had infiltrators cause disruption among the group and at demonstrations. That's how Malcolm X was killed.

The Black Panther's never carried out any acts of violence, except a few cases of Bank robberies that were planned and pushed by Police informants. The Poloce under cover plant suggested the robbery, supplied the plans and the guns. The leaders of the Panthers never endorsed any acts of violence.

You won't see any MBC mini series on it but our air waves are filled with pro cop propaganda.

I remember the Vietnam War very well as I followed it during my high school years. In 1965 when the teacher asked what we thought of the war only I and another student even knew about the Vietnam War. In 1966 an older friend of brother was killed in Vietnam. I faced the draft myself at the time.

When I was in high school the Corporate Media backed the war and I believed it. But I was a musician and listened and played music by Bob Dylan, Phil Ochs and others and grew up in the Hippie culture that was arising at the time. I was raised at that time in New Jersey, just out side NY City. I even went to the Yippie head quarters in Greenwich Village but never met Abby Hoffman or Jerry Rubin. As I learned more about the war the more I saw the lie and I also saw the media switch sides and begin to become critical of it.

The most powerful influence in my decision to oppose it was when a friend of mines older brother came back from Vietnam very different then he left and he stuck his finger in my chest and said, "Stay the "F**** out of Vietnam." It's all F*** up and the people don't want us there.

The violence that some people are confusing the 68 Police riot with was the "Days of Rage" which was basically a series of violent acts carried out by a group called "The Weatherman." This was not connected in any way with the 68 convention protests, which were made up of collage students, reachers, clergy etc. Much like demonstrations today. The Weathermen is the group Bill Ayers who is now a professor at a university belonged to and who Obama had some association with.

In the 1968 convention it was the Police that rioted.
The Days of Rage, the Black Panther Party, and the 68 Convention in Chicago are all different events. Brought to you courtesy of the guys who brought you Stoner, Wallace, Westmoreland, Cambodia, civilian bombing of Hanoi, Calley, Thurman, McNamara, and the Ohio National
Guard at Kent State.

Dang! Those were sure some messed up times!
pogo-where did you come up with this stuff? I can't even respond cause I can't understand that kind of mindset. In your mind, the only ones who ever do anything wrong are the police and the gov't. while the Black Panthers are doing after-school programs and servin' pancakes, and the media is filled with "pro cop propaganda!" Me thinks you spent way too much time at the Yippee "headquarters"(toke) in Greenwich "learning" about the war.(toke) woahhh, dude.(toke) that was some good sh** (toke) yeahhhh.
________________________________________________________________________________________________


Neal Hughes:

The Days of Rage, the Black Panther Party, and the 68 Convention in Chicago are all different events. Brought to you courtesy of the guys who brought you Stoner, Wallace, Westmoreland, Cambodia, civilian bombing of Hanoi, Calley, Thurman, McNamara, and the Ohio National
Guard at Kent State.

Dang! Those were sure some messed up times!

________________________________________________________________________________________________


It was actually a very exciting time in that social changes were taking place. Inspired by the Civil Rights Movement people were speaking out against injustice and organizing and calling for changes and reforms. The Vietnam War was on and taking away young lives and the anti War movements were growing. It was all mainly peaceful. I also watched peaceful Blacks marching for their rights attacked and beaten by the Police. Same as the anti war movements.

Music and culture was "exploding" with new ideas and forms and there were no bounds or rules restricting thought. We were exploring all kinds changes. The Hippie culture was arising and "Love was in the air" and Peace was the word of the day. It was mainly a peaceful movement. It was the right wing and Power Structure that responded with violence. This also caused some violence by the left. There were police and government "agent provocateurs" within the groups pushing for trouble and violence. That's a fact that was hidden by our Corporate Media. There are books and articles about it and people can do their own searches on it. The FBI program was called COINITEL PRO.

The "Days of Rage" and violence that was carried out was always against Property and not against people. But the left never endorsed this stuff and the Weatherman movement were extremists at the time. They carried it out to stop a war machine that was unresponsive to the people. At the Time there was a draft that was taking young men into the war against their will who didn't even have the right to vote.

As I say a big influence were the soldiers coming home from war that began to tell the truth as to what was happening in Vietnam. They also had the "Winter Soldier" Hearings which like today's Winter Soldier Hearings the media ignored, except of course for the progressive alternative media. That's why the Right Wing hate John Kerry so much. He was one of those returning soldiers that spoke out. The military actually mutinied. There is a good documentary on it called "Sir, No Sir."

As the famous line from Dickens goes, "It was it was the worst of times, it was the best of times..."
quote:
Originally posted by RoadHawg:
quote:
Originally posted by Howard Roark:
All 2000 of them?


LOL!!


There are about 2000 in Franklin County alone. They marched about a year ago on the main street of Russellville and then later in Colbert County.

While it is really easy to laugh at these people because it is such a ridiculous organization. It is also serious and tragic that so many people could STILL support an organization like the KKK.

I drove past the march just because I had never seen anything like this since I am younger and never really saw the KKK(born in the 80s).

I'll tell you that most people were lucky to have a full set of teeth, a bath, and no lice. I couldn't believe my eyes that people as disgusting and filthy as them, cranked out on meth, were actually having a rally proclaiming to "hate" another race or group of people.

You know, if I could start an organization of my own, I would start some kind of group to have filthy, cranked out meth addicts shipped off to some island--away from me and away from their children. Obviously I wouldn't resort to killing, but at least ridding the place of lice-ridden meth heads like the pied piper would clean up the area and make it a lot safer for kids.

Talk about freaky people-I wish I had taken a picture. It would say so much more than 1000 words. Even the most staunchly conservative person would have been amazed at the hatred taking place on the steps of a small town courthouse....
quote:
Originally posted by Howard Roark:
Yo, JJP et al,

I was refering to one of the largest of 3 to four groups using the name KKK. In all, today, researchers estimate about 150 Klan chapters with 5,000-8,000 members nationwide.

That's in a nation of 308,000,000. No, not FOX.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan


8,000 people who commit hate crimes is definitely a LARGE number to me. Knowing they exist but aren't a large organization like say the SBC doesn't make them less of a threat.

They are still radical and can harm anyone they wish if they unite. I have not heard of anything in the media recently of anyone being killed by the KKK, but then again it could have gone unreported.

I imagine they also know better than to kill anymore, considering hate crimes are punishable by law. And I hope they never hurt anyone again.
Its much less than the 3 to 5 million they had in the 1930s when our population was about 140,000,000 To day, the kluxers are monitored and spied upon by the FBI to the extreme. I suspect 10 percent of the membership are agents or informants -- a practice I approve of. Just wish they were doing the same to the more radical mosques.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×