Skip to main content

Reading the news that Chelsea Mazvinsky is expecting a baby. Not sure what else she could except accept a baby. And it is reported that it makes the pundits wonder how it will effect her mother's political career and chances for President. Not to worry, she can have an abortion up until the last minute if they figure out it will not be good for Hillary. And how can a Democrat have a baby? Don't they want government to pay for free abortions, birth control, access to abortion on demand, and nobody had better dare question their decision. And why has the gay agenda not chastised her as a breeder and condemned her condition. And why has the Green's not spoken up against her for adding to the carbon footprint of the earth. Oh yeah, that's right. They all worship at the alter of Clinton and liberalism, so all that is ok with them. And will Bill and Hillary demand that nobody talk or write about her in the press? Of course they will. But I say to hell with all those people. A lot of people will be looking forward to another Clinton for sure. But I bet they don't call her Monica.

Last edited by Bulldog63
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Sarah Palin made a mockery of her child over and over again. 

 

I don't remember any hysteria from the left about the little boy. I remember Sarah saying he would have to go before a death panel if the ACA passed. Which we all know is a huge lie and she only said it to be sensational and cause hysteria. Is that what you mean?

 

 

Originally Posted by Bulldog63:

I seem to remember the press, Liberal leaning papers, that the baby was not hers, that if she was a smart woman and learned of his disabilities beforehand like she did, she would have aborted it, and so on and so on. I don't hear the music but I see the dancing around the truth like it happens when facts are presented.

_____________________

 

So you are going after Chelsea and her pregnancy because some loony toons from the left didn't believe that Trig was Sarah Palins son? 

 

Both you, and those that spread such stupid crap about Trig Palin are all the same. Have fun with it. It only makes you look like an imbecile and a classless human being.

 

You have to dig pretty deep and read some extreme nut job blog sites to find anyone saying bad things about that little boy. Yet, you think it represents all liberals? So that is how you justify your attack on Chelsea and her pregnancy? 

 

 

Originally Posted by Bulldog63:

And remember, that in a Liberal's mind it is not a baby until it is born. So you shouldn't call it that unless you want to be excommunicated from the Democrat Party.

______________________

 

LIfe is not as black and white as you are other extremist see it. Those of us that are pro choice see a lot of gray areas and can understand many sides to womens reproductive rights. I know that its hard for you, but try, just this once. 

I am a mother and I am pro choice. How do you reconcile that in your mind? Do you honestly think that all liberals believe every pregnancy should end in abortion? There are reasons and circumstances for abortion. Not every pregnancy is the same. A woman can have a few children and then her circumstances change and become pregnant and decide to abort. 

 

Why would Chelsea abort her pregnancy? She is financially able to support a baby, she is married, as far as we know right now she is healthy enough to carry it to term, there is no reason to believe that there are any serious birth defects, she seems to be very happy about the pregnancy, so what reason do you think she should or would abort? Because she is a liberal? If that is what you are saying then that is a ridiculous idea.

 

If a 11 year old girl was raped by her father and became pregnant, could she have an abortion? Or should she be further traumatized by a 9 month pregnancy and painful birth of her own brother or sister? 

 

Should a woman with 3 kids who has lost her job and her BC failed and becomes pregnant have another child that she would not be able to feed or support? Who pays for that child? How can she find employment to support her children if she is pregnant?

 

Should a woman who finds out that the baby has severe birth defects and will live a short and painful life not be allowed to abort? 

 

Who should make these decisions? Me? You? Or the female that has the real burden and faces the true reality of these situations? 

 

Liberals are pro choice. That means they believe the choice should be left up to the woman. I have no idea where you got the notion that Liberals are against anyone having a baby. That would be anti-choice. I have never heard any Liberal say that women should end every pregnancy. That must be some strange right wing lie on infowars or some other extremist blog site. Liberals have babies every day. Matter of fact every generation gets more and more liberal in this country. 

 

 

Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

I am a mother and I am pro choice. How do you reconcile that in your mind? Do you honestly think that all liberals believe every pregnancy should end in abortion? There are reasons and circumstances for abortion. Not every pregnancy is the same. A woman can have a few children and then her circumstances change and become pregnant and decide to abort. 

 

Why would Chelsea abort her pregnancy? She is financially able to support a baby, she is married, as far as we know right now she is healthy enough to carry it to term, there is no reason to believe that there are any serious birth defects, she seems to be very happy about the pregnancy, so what reason do you think she should or would abort? Because she is a liberal? If that is what you are saying then that is a ridiculous idea.

 

If a 11 year old girl was raped by her father and became pregnant, could she have an abortion? Or should she be further traumatized by a 9 month pregnancy and painful birth of her own brother or sister? 

 

Should a woman with 3 kids who has lost her job and her BC failed and becomes pregnant have another child that she would not be able to feed or support? Who pays for that child? How can she find employment to support her children if she is pregnant?

 

Should a woman who finds out that the baby has severe birth defects and will live a short and painful life not be allowed to abort? 

 

Who should make these decisions? Me? You? Or the female that has the real burden and faces the true reality of these situations? 

 

Liberals are pro choice. That means they believe the choice should be left up to the woman. I have no idea where you got the notion that Liberals are against anyone having a baby. That would be anti-choice. I have never heard any Liberal say that women should end every pregnancy. That must be some strange right wing lie on infowars or some other extremist blog site. Liberals have babies every day. Matter of fact every generation gets more and more liberal in this country. 

 

 

If we could get liberals to be as "hands off" when it comes to a business owner's business or to someone's financial life as they are when it comes to a woman's reproductive system then we would be getting somewhere.

Add Reply


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×