Watch closely
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...vslc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...ZXNk&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...4FB4&feature=related
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
My god.
They resorted to irreducible complexity. This concept has been shot down in flames for years.
What sort of fools believe this drivel? Have they not sought out alternative viewpoints to this asinine concept?
I am shocked at the stupidity that serves as reason to doubt evolution. I'm sure the regularly intelligent here do as well.
This fight is over. Legally, scientifically, and morally. Creationism/ID loses. Again. As it always will and must.
Honestly, when will they cease to embarrass themselves?
NSNS
They resorted to irreducible complexity. This concept has been shot down in flames for years.
What sort of fools believe this drivel? Have they not sought out alternative viewpoints to this asinine concept?
I am shocked at the stupidity that serves as reason to doubt evolution. I'm sure the regularly intelligent here do as well.
This fight is over. Legally, scientifically, and morally. Creationism/ID loses. Again. As it always will and must.
Honestly, when will they cease to embarrass themselves?
NSNS
slim, you didn't watch the movies. bad bad boy.
If you watch them you will no longer plan you life around dawkins lies.
The scientific community so wishes you atheist would take up knitting.
If you watch them you will no longer plan you life around dawkins lies.
The scientific community so wishes you atheist would take up knitting.
No, I watched them.
They fool no one of normal smarts. Phillip Johnson, Michael Behe, they're just crooked. Only to be believed by ignorant sheep.
What is the Theory of Intelligent Design?
NSNS
They fool no one of normal smarts. Phillip Johnson, Michael Behe, they're just crooked. Only to be believed by ignorant sheep.
What is the Theory of Intelligent Design?
NSNS
Slim there are seven movies . You didn’t watch them. Don’t lie to me.
…and you blastfeem something you don’t even know about.
Hummm odd. I think I’ve seen this trait in the unlearned.
Hummm odd. I think I’ve seen this trait in the unlearned.
quote:Originally posted by buffalo:
…and you blastfeem something you don’t even know about.
Hummm odd. I think I’ve seen this trait in the unlearned.
You misunderstand me.
Oh, yes, I watched every one of them. One of them twice. I want to know what's on those idiots' minds.
And they are idiots. I actually watch with a critical mind. I crave evidence that defies evolution.
Nonesuch is coming from these guys. From no one else, I imagine, but my mind is open.
For the luvvagod, they presented Phillip Johnson and Michael Behe. As if they were not embarrassed enough at Dover. They're fools. Dishonest, maladjusted, misguided fools. Not only the entire scientific community says so, but a Federal Judge did as well.
But YOU know better than all of science and years of legal precedence. Yeah, right. You can't even spell.
Give me your proof of ID. Now. I'll regard it critically, as scientific proof should be regarded. If it's solid, I'll say so.
Now.
Here.
Produce.
Or shut up.
nsns
quote:Originally posted by Not Shallow Not Slim:quote:Originally posted by buffalo:
…and you blastfeem something you don’t even know about.
Hummm odd. I think I’ve seen this trait in the unlearned.
You misunderstand me.
Oh, yes, I watched every one of them. One of them twice. I want to know what's on those idiots' minds.
And they are idiots. I actually watch with a critical mind. I crave evidence that defies evolution.
Nonesuch is coming from these guys. From no one else, I imagine, but my mind is open.
For the luvvagod, they presented Phillip Johnson and Michael Behe. As if they were not embarrassed enough at Dover. They're fools. Dishonest, maladjusted, misguided fools. Not only the entire scientific community says so, but a Federal Judge did as well.
But YOU know better than all of science and years of legal precedence. Yeah, right. You can't even spell.
Give me your proof of ID. Now. I'll regard it critically, as scientific proof should be regarded. If it's solid, I'll say so.
Now.
Here.
Produce.
Or shut up.
nsns
My proof?
There is no un-intelligent design to the universe now is there even in your notion of hyper cycle if it exists is not un-intelligent but is far from being considered other than a concoction not observed anywhere much less in a lab condition.