Skip to main content

Keep it up, Mr. Brown. Your sexist remarks will only garner more female votes for Warren.

 

http://www.boston.com/Boston/m...3Uvfk98qI/index.html

 

Republican Senator Scott Brown appeared to belittle Democrat Elizabeth Warren’s physical appearance with a comment he made during a radio interview this morning.

Brown was responding to a crack Warren made in Tuesday’s debate, when the Democrat was asked about Scott Brown using his centerfold spread in Cosmopolitan magazine decades ago to pay for college. Warren said “I didn’t take my clothes off” to pay for school.

Asked by the WZLX disc jockey for a response, Brown said “Thank God,” eliciting laughter from the DJs....


Warren, a Harvard Law School professor, graduated from the University of Houston and Rutgers School of Law.

In an e-mail after the radio appearance this morning, Brown’s campaign did not directly respond to a question about why the senator made a joke about Warren’s appearance. Campaign manager Jim Barnett said: “It’s elitist of Professor Warren to look down at the decisions Scott Brown made to put himself through college and rise above the circumstances of his life. Scott has fought and scraped for everything he’s got.”

Warren’s spokesman had no immediate reaction, but Democrats pounced on Brown’s remarks.

“Sen. Brown’s comments are the kind of thing you would expect to hear in a frat house, not a race for US Senate,” Clare Kelly, executive director of the Massachusetts Democratic Party, said in a statement. “Scott Brown’s comments send a terrible message that even accomplished women who are held in the highest esteem can be laughingly dismissed based on their looks.”

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Auction off his daughters??? LOLOLOL, oh for crying out loud, what a stretch!! Who hasn't heard proud mothers and fathers say things like that??? LOLOLOLOLOL!! And B is absolutely right, after all the crap spewed about palin i don't see how in the world anyone could say anything about his remark. I think it was funny-she insulted him and he popped her back, and it was funny. Good for him. Oh, but I keep forgetting, the democrats don't think people should "give their crap" back to them!!!

Hey buttercup, I have a little gasoline for the fire of your indignation. Hillary Clinton is a flabby old bag with cankles, and Scott Brown is correct, thank G-D there are no naked pictures of the socialist broom rider Elizabeth Warren.

 

Funny thing I didn't see you attacking "Contendah" for his post belittling Chris Christie's appearance here, but then it was not expected....

Originally Posted by b50m:

He's sexist while all liberals bashed Sarah Palin from day one in 2008? Insulting her looks, her intelligence, her kids, her husband, ect.......

 

Double standard of BS.

============================================================================

 

Wrong.  I don't recall anyone ever bashing her looks.  She wears waaay too much makeup but she's an attractive woman - I recall even the democrats saying as much.

 

As for her intelligence, reading a book now and again would do her some good.  She's the one who's made the gaffes and has herself to blame for them.

 

As for her family, I don't recall the media saying anything negative about them.  In fact, when Bristol was on Dancing With The Stars she was left alone by the media.  And I have to give Bristol some points.  Of the 15 minutes of Palin's Alaska reality-type show I caught, Bristol told her mom she had "prom hair" or something like that.  I thought that was funny. 

Originally Posted by marksw59:

Hey buttercup, I have a little gasoline for the fire of your indignation. Hillary Clinton is a flabby old bag with cankles, and Scott Brown is correct, thank G-D there are no naked pictures of the socialist broom rider Elizabeth Warren.

 

Funny thing I didn't see you attacking "Contendah" for his post belittling Chris Christie's appearance here, but then it was not expected....

============================================================================

 

I'm guessing you're at least in your 50's, Mark; therefore, I'm also guessing your wife - if you were able to manage such a contract with a free-thinking female - is at least in her 50's, too.  I'm also guessing she probably doesn't look like Gisele Bündchen about now.  So if she's not a "babe," you're probably cheating on her - again, if you were able to manage such a feat with a free-thinking female - because you wouldn't want to wake up next to a "flabby old bag with cankles" every day, now would you?

 

Women like Warren who are educated, hold prestigious jobs, think and reason for themselves, and can give as good as they get in debates intimidate you don't they?  I wonder if it's the misfortune of living with the affliction of underdeveloped genitals that compels men like you to lash out and say nasty things about women like Warren - not to mention encourages y'all to buy big trucks and big guns, and talk about what manly-men you are...but I digress.

 

And speaking of underdeveloped genitals, super-morbidly obese men like Christie often suffer from that same malady.  No wonder he's so angry.  But to answer your question, Christie is dangerously overweight and not the best person to be a leader of anything, considering he's one T-bone steak away from a massive heart attack and sudden death.  Facts are facts, Marky Mark.

 

Last edited by Buttercup

All this indignation over a little remark that the woman absolutely deserved. What was he supposed to say in this oh so proper world of pc? "Thank you ma'am may I have more"?? She's so "free thinking" that she can't handle it when it's handed back to her? Now all of a sudden she's not so "intimidating" as she thought she was. Now she's ready to cry "hey I'm a girl", What she should have said was "OK, I had that one coming". Because she did have it coming, he gave it to her, it was funny, move on.

Originally Posted by marksw59:

Hey buttercup, I have a little gasoline for the fire of your indignation. Hillary Clinton is a flabby old bag with cankles, and Scott Brown is correct, thank G-D there are no naked pictures of the socialist broom rider Elizabeth Warren.

 

Funny thing I didn't see you attacking "Contendah" for his post belittling Chris Christie's appearance here, but then it was not expected....

*****

 

Bulletin for you, Buttercup:  I am not running for the Senate in Massachusetts; Scott Brown is. What is fair game for internet forums is not necessarily fair game or sensible content  for a declared candidate's public political statements. Contendah does not have to worry about the political fallout of his postings, but Scott Brown should be savvy enough to keep his frat boy comments to himself and his close associates. He is in trouble enough.  Elizabeth Warren, a college professor who has never run for any office, and who declared her candidacy only a short time ago, is only a couple of percentage points behind Brown in the latest poll.  He should be careful not to unnecessary alienate any voters by such intemperate and gratuitous remarks as his snide allusion to Ms. Warren's appearance.

Originally Posted by Buttercup:
 

As for her family, I don't recall the media saying anything negative about them.  In fact, when Bristol was on Dancing With The Stars she was left alone by the media.  And I have to give Bristol some points.  Of the 15 minutes of Palin's Alaska reality-type show I caught, Bristol told her mom she had "prom hair" or something like that.  I thought that was funny. 

 

You have a warped memory. The comments about her clothes? The comments about her having a Down's child?  That Bristol's gave birth to Sarah's baby and her own? That Sarah was evil for have a Down's baby? On and on and on........where were you? Listening to Chris Matthews talk about his tingle?

Her remark to him reflected on his morals. HIS remark to HER reflected on her LOOKS. A persons moral choices have bearing in a political race. But his remark about her looks boils down to an all too common belief amongst certain males, that women are only good for one thing.

 

That is one of the problems I have with the Republican party. In the 2008 election, it was very obvious that McCain chose Palin as his running mate because he thought he would gain the vote of women who had supported Hillary. And he thought he would gain the votes of men because he chose a "hot babe".

 

Insulting to women everywhere - it shows that McCain and his party believe women are stupid enough to vote for anyone SOLELY because she is a woman. And it shows that McCain had a low enough opinion of men, believing that sex appeal would trump competence.

 

Brown's comment was not only sexist, it was disgusting. How ANY woman could see it any other way astounds me.

I see it another way and I am a female. You step in the political pit, you have to take what they give you and give it back.

 

Her remark was uncalled for as well. At least he paid for college and didn't wait for a government handout. Posing nude is not immoral, paintings and statues have been done of nudes since time began.

She implied it was immoral.

 

How many people have said Christie can't run because he's too fat and ugly?

 

I see butter did not respond to the txt given to Sarah's family during the campaign.

 

People voted for Obama SOLELY because he's black. How is that any better?

Originally Posted by b50m:

I see it another way and I am a female. You step in the political pit, you have to take what they give you and give it back.

 

Her remark was uncalled for as well. At least he paid for college and didn't wait for a government handout. Posing nude is not immoral, paintings and statues have been done of nudes since time began.

She implied it was immoral.

 

How many people have said Christie can't run because he's too fat and ugly?

 

I see butter did not respond to the txt given to Sarah's family during the campaign.

 

People voted for Obama SOLELY because he's black. How is that any better?

____________________________________________________________________________

 

No, B, I think MORE people voted for Obama simply because he was not George Bush. McCain was too much LIKE Bush. If the Democrats had put my dog BB up against Bush, BB would have won.

 

And speaking of underdeveloped genitals, super-morbidly obese men like Christie often suffer from that same malady. No wonder he's so angry. But to answer your question, Christie is dangerously overweight and not the best person to be a leader of anything, considering he's one T-bone steak away from a massive heart attack and sudden death. Facts are facts, Marky Mark.

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

LOL!! You are just precious!! How in the world would you know about obese men's genitals? What if some of the male p o r n  "stars" gained a massive amount of weight, would their genitals suddenly be underdeveloped? Or did his genitals not develope because nature knew he would one day be obese? Good gawd woman, get a grip. If you want to think of something scary you could think about the fact we're just one cigarette away from BIDEN!!!

Originally Posted by O No!:
No, B, I think MORE people voted for Obama simply because he was not George Bush. McCain was too much LIKE Bush. If the Democrats had put my dog BB up against Bush, BB would have won.
 

 I doubt that. You hated Bush but a lot of people didn't. When GW won in 2004, the popular vote was:

Bush 62,040,610

Kerry 59,028,444

 

In 2008, the popular vote was:

Obama 69,456,897

McCain 59,934,814

 

So Obama won with all the new young voters that he energized and all the black vote. But, McCain had more votes in 2008 than Kerry did in 2004.

............................................................................................

Butters,

As for Christie and his privates, lets just keep that private. So fat people are also a blight on society? My, you have a small world butters.

Originally Posted by Buttercup:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

Hey buttercup, I have a little gasoline for the fire of your indignation. Hillary Clinton is a flabby old bag with cankles, and Scott Brown is correct, thank G-D there are no naked pictures of the socialist broom rider Elizabeth Warren.

 

Funny thing I didn't see you attacking "Contendah" for his post belittling Chris Christie's appearance here, but then it was not expected....

============================================================================

 

I'm guessing you're at least in your 50's, Mark; therefore, I'm also guessing your wife - if you were able to manage such a contract with a free-thinking female - is at least in her 50's, too.  I'm also guessing she probably doesn't look like Gisele Bündchen about now.  So if she's not a "babe," you're probably cheating on her - again, if you were able to manage such a feat with a free-thinking female - because you wouldn't want to wake up next to a "flabby old bag with cankles" every day, now would you?

 

Well you got my age group right, but since I’ve stated that in the past, your guess is no great feat. Nice ad hominem you’ve begun here. 

 

Women like Warren who are educated, hold prestigious jobs, think and reason for themselves, and can give as good as they get in debates intimidate you don't they?  I wonder if it's the misfortune of living with the affliction of underdeveloped genitals that compels men like you to lash out and say nasty things about women like Warren - not to mention encourages y'all to buy big trucks and big guns, and talk about what manly-men you are...but I digress.

 

What do you know of my genitals? Nothing I’ll wager, even though you imply that you have divined such information somehow. I was “compelled” post what I did because you so-called “progressives” are hypocrites as clearly demonstrated by the lack of reaction to Contendah’s post about Chris Christie’s appearance. Yes appearance, because Contendah never mentioned his health in his post, he only made derisive remarks about Christie’s appearance.
 
As far as the gravitas of educated women(or men for that matter), I’ll paraphrase Mark Twain, “Don’t confuse education with intelligence.”
 
Big trucks? I’m into “rat rods” as far as my shallow fascination with vehicles is concerned, big trucks are only practical if you have a big job to do that requires such a vehicle, therefore big trucks are impractical for me. It is the same with guns, and tools for that matter. The reason there are so many types, is there are many jobs to be done. I mean you don’t shoot rabbits with a Barrett 50cal, you don’t hunt deer with a two shot 22cal derringer, and you don’t use either for home defense. Again, it is the matter of practicality in using the correct tool for the job to be done, but  I’m guessing you’re educated, right? English major?

 

And speaking of underdeveloped genitals, super-morbidly obese men like Christie often suffer from that same malady.  No wonder he's so angry.  But to answer your question, Christie is dangerously overweight and not the best person to be a leader of anything, considering he's one T-bone steak away from a massive heart attack and sudden death.  Facts are facts, Marky Mark.

 

Sure, facts are facts. Tell me when you state one. You seem to be bound up in some fascination over male genitalia, seemingly with a special penchant for the genitals of obese men, which could lead a person to wonder if it’s the misfortune of unresolved penile envy that motivates you. Finally, you start to spin like your avatar when you speciously interject deceitfully false health concerns over Chris Christie’s weight, when you KNOW the reference was to Contendah’s attack on Christies’ appearance. Nice try. Fail.

Originally Posted by O No!:

No, B, I think MORE people voted for Obama simply because he was not George Bush. McCain was too much LIKE Bush. If the Democrats had put my dog BB up against Bush, BB would have won.

 

You do realize Bush wasn't really running against Obama in 2008, right? Even though McCain is, according to you, "Too much LIKE Bush", the hypothetical election between your dog BB and the Republican would have been your dog versus McCain. You do understand that, right? Bush was not running then, and he is no longer POTUS. Just want to make sure you know these things. We can go over it again if need be.

Well, google it. Reports I found, some going back as far as 2005, say being obese doesn't equate to being unhealthy. I didn't see any mention of underdeveloped genitals, but then again I was just scanning the articles. Maybe buttercup has a link to that fact.

 

 

One example:

 

November 17, 2006

“Obesity Paradox” #1

 
Several studies this week have tried to explain what is being called the “obesity paradox:” the fact that most fat people actually live longer than thin people.

At this week’s meeting of the American Heart Association, yet another study was reported which found that fatter cardiac patients were more likely to survive hospitalization and invasive treatments than thinner ones, even when adjusting for age and other contributing factors. In this analysis of 130,139 heart disease patients, 5.4% of “normal” weight patients died, as compared to 2.4% of “obese” and 3.1% of “overweight.” Yes, those whose were “obese” were more than two times more likely to survive!

 

 

This April, researchers at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles reported their clinical study of 14,739 patients with coronary artery disease, that had been confirmed on tomography, who were followed for over three years. They found that “obese” and “overweight” patients were at significantly lower risks for cardiac death than “normal” weight patients.

 

 

http://junkfoodscience.blogspo...esity-paradox-1.html

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Buttercup:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

Hey buttercup, I have a little gasoline for the fire of your indignation. Hillary Clinton is a flabby old bag with cankles, and Scott Brown is correct, thank G-D there are no naked pictures of the socialist broom rider Elizabeth Warren.

 

Funny thing I didn't see you attacking "Contendah" for his post belittling Chris Christie's appearance here, but then it was not expected....

============================================================================

 

I'm guessing you're at least in your 50's, Mark; therefore, I'm also guessing your wife - if you were able to manage such a contract with a free-thinking female - is at least in her 50's, too.  I'm also guessing she probably doesn't look like Gisele Bündchen about now.  So if she's not a "babe," you're probably cheating on her - again, if you were able to manage such a feat with a free-thinking female - because you wouldn't want to wake up next to a "flabby old bag with cankles" every day, now would you?

 

Well you got my age group right, but since I’ve stated that in the past, your guess is no great feat. Nice ad hominem you’ve begun here. 

 

Women like Warren who are educated, hold prestigious jobs, think and reason for themselves, and can give as good as they get in debates intimidate you don't they?  I wonder if it's the misfortune of living with the affliction of underdeveloped genitals that compels men like you to lash out and say nasty things about women like Warren - not to mention encourages y'all to buy big trucks and big guns, and talk about what manly-men you are...but I digress.

 

What do you know of my genitals? Nothing I’ll wager, even though you imply that you have divined such information somehow. I was “compelled” post what I did because you so-called “progressives” are hypocrites as clearly demonstrated by the lack of reaction to Contendah’s post about Chris Christie’s appearance. Yes appearance, because Contendah never mentioned his health in his post, he only made derisive remarks about Christie’s appearance.
 
As far as the gravitas of educated women(or men for that matter), I’ll paraphrase Mark Twain, “Don’t confuse education with intelligence.”
 
Big trucks? I’m into “rat rods” as far as my shallow fascination with vehicles is concerned, big trucks are only practical if you have a big job to do that requires such a vehicle, therefore big trucks are impractical for me. It is the same with guns, and tools for that matter. The reason there are so many types, is there are many jobs to be done. I mean you don’t shoot rabbits with a Barrett 50cal, you don’t hunt deer with a two shot 22cal derringer, and you don’t use either for home defense. Again, it is the matter of practicality in using the correct tool for the job to be done, but  I’m guessing you’re educated, right? English major?

 

And speaking of underdeveloped genitals, super-morbidly obese men like Christie often suffer from that same malady.  No wonder he's so angry.  But to answer your question, Christie is dangerously overweight and not the best person to be a leader of anything, considering he's one T-bone steak away from a massive heart attack and sudden death.  Facts are facts, Marky Mark.

 

Sure, facts are facts. Tell me when you state one. You seem to be bound up in some fascination over male genitalia, seemingly with a special penchant for the genitals of obese men, which could lead a person to wonder if it’s the misfortune of unresolved penile envy that motivates you. Finally, you start to spin like your avatar when you speciously interject deceitfully false health concerns over Chris Christie’s weight, when you KNOW the reference was to Contendah’s attack on Christies’ appearance. Nice try. Fail.

============================================================================

 

Wow!  That's quite a reaction there, Mark.  I must have hit a nerve - the dorsal nerve, apparently. 

 

But what happened to all the winks you used to insert in your posts?  I was expecting at least 112 of those.


Oh, and I didn't read any of Contendah’s thread about Chris Christie.  I only check this forum every few weeks or so now.  There's no denying that Christie meets the definition of fat; how a woman looks without clothes is opinion.  That's the difference, to me. 

 

Last edited by Buttercup
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Well, google it. Reports I found, some going back as far as 2005, say being obese doesn't equate to being unhealthy. I didn't see any mention of underdeveloped genitals, but then again I was just scanning the articles. Maybe buttercup has a link to that fact.

 

 

One example:

 

November 17, 2006

“Obesity Paradox” #1

 
Several studies this week have tried to explain what is being called the “obesity paradox:” the fact that most fat people actually live longer than thin people.

At this week’s meeting of the American Heart Association, yet another study was reported which found that fatter cardiac patients were more likely to survive hospitalization and invasive treatments than thinner ones, even when adjusting for age and other contributing factors. In this analysis of 130,139 heart disease patients, 5.4% of “normal” weight patients died, as compared to 2.4% of “obese” and 3.1% of “overweight.” Yes, those whose were “obese” were more than two times more likely to survive!

 

 

This April, researchers at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles reported their clinical study of 14,739 patients with coronary artery disease, that had been confirmed on tomography, who were followed for over three years. They found that “obese” and “overweight” patients were at significantly lower risks for cardiac death than “normal” weight patients.

 

 

http://junkfoodscience.blogspo...esity-paradox-1.html

============================================================================

 

LOL!  Y'all take yourselves waaaaay too seriously on these threads.  "Underdeveloped" may not be accurate, but it was fun to type.

 

But I wasn't too far off on obesity affecting size.  According to Dr. Oz (and I've read this same thing in Cosmopolitan and other magazines):


(I inserted "male part" since the filter won't allow the actual "p" word.  Geez!)

 

http://www.doctoroz.com/videos...erection-telling-you

 

Overweight and Inactivity - Nothing puts a damper on sex like a buried male part. ED can be as high as 80% among obese and overweight men. Additionally, overweight men who lose 35 pounds can add an inch to the length of their male part!

Here's how I see it:

 

Warren was asked a question about how she paid for college to which she responded, "I didn't take my clothes off."

It was clearly a jab at Brown on Warren's part, but it was not a sexist remark. It is a fact that Brown took his clothes off and posed for a magazine to pay for school.

Now contrast what she said with what he said about her:

Listen to how he said it, and the reaction of the deejays...how they join in and laugh. It does indeed sound more like a bunch of callow frat boys yucking it up than a serious discussion about the senate race.  And it is sexist: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FppaOatYikI

We take ourselves too seriously? I'd say it was you that went overboard.  I don't care how he said it, it was clever and a great comeback. IF she had been a man he would have still used that come back and it would have still been funny. The only difference is you'd have found another way to complain about it. Buttercup, what you said was "underdeveloped" genitals. That's not quite the same thing as what your doctor said now is it? You need to do what she should have done and that is what I said earlier. Just admit you had it coming and move on.

Originally Posted by Buttercup:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Buttercup:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

Hey buttercup, I have a little gasoline for the fire of your indignation. Hillary Clinton is a flabby old bag with cankles, and Scott Brown is correct, thank G-D there are no naked pictures of the socialist broom rider Elizabeth Warren.

 

Funny thing I didn't see you attacking "Contendah" for his post belittling Chris Christie's appearance here, but then it was not expected....

============================================================================

 

I'm guessing you're at least in your 50's, Mark; therefore, I'm also guessing your wife - if you were able to manage such a contract with a free-thinking female - is at least in her 50's, too.  I'm also guessing she probably doesn't look like Gisele Bündchen about now.  So if she's not a "babe," you're probably cheating on her - again, if you were able to manage such a feat with a free-thinking female - because you wouldn't want to wake up next to a "flabby old bag with cankles" every day, now would you?

 

Well you got my age group right, but since I’ve stated that in the past, your guess is no great feat. Nice ad hominem you’ve begun here. 

 

Women like Warren who are educated, hold prestigious jobs, think and reason for themselves, and can give as good as they get in debates intimidate you don't they?  I wonder if it's the misfortune of living with the affliction of underdeveloped genitals that compels men like you to lash out and say nasty things about women like Warren - not to mention encourages y'all to buy big trucks and big guns, and talk about what manly-men you are...but I digress.

 

What do you know of my genitals? Nothing I’ll wager, even though you imply that you have divined such information somehow. I was “compelled” post what I did because you so-called “progressives” are hypocrites as clearly demonstrated by the lack of reaction to Contendah’s post about Chris Christie’s appearance. Yes appearance, because Contendah never mentioned his health in his post, he only made derisive remarks about Christie’s appearance.
 
As far as the gravitas of educated women(or men for that matter), I’ll paraphrase Mark Twain, “Don’t confuse education with intelligence.”
 
Big trucks? I’m into “rat rods” as far as my shallow fascination with vehicles is concerned, big trucks are only practical if you have a big job to do that requires such a vehicle, therefore big trucks are impractical for me. It is the same with guns, and tools for that matter. The reason there are so many types, is there are many jobs to be done. I mean you don’t shoot rabbits with a Barrett 50cal, you don’t hunt deer with a two shot 22cal derringer, and you don’t use either for home defense. Again, it is the matter of practicality in using the correct tool for the job to be done, but  I’m guessing you’re educated, right? English major?

 

And speaking of underdeveloped genitals, super-morbidly obese men like Christie often suffer from that same malady.  No wonder he's so angry.  But to answer your question, Christie is dangerously overweight and not the best person to be a leader of anything, considering he's one T-bone steak away from a massive heart attack and sudden death.  Facts are facts, Marky Mark.

 

Sure, facts are facts. Tell me when you state one. You seem to be bound up in some fascination over male genitalia, seemingly with a special penchant for the genitals of obese men, which could lead a person to wonder if it’s the misfortune of unresolved penile envy that motivates you. Finally, you start to spin like your avatar when you speciously interject deceitfully false health concerns over Chris Christie’s weight, when you KNOW the reference was to Contendah’s attack on Christies’ appearance. Nice try. Fail.

============================================================================

 

Wow!  That's quite a reaction there, Mark.  I must have hit a nerve - the dorsal nerve, apparently. 

 

But what happened to all the winks you used to insert in your posts?  I was expecting at least 112 of those.


Oh, and I didn't read any of Contendah’s thread about Chris Christie.  I only check this forum every few weeks or so now.  There's no denying that Christie meets the definition of fat; how a woman looks without clothes is opinion.  That's the difference, to me. 

 

I always react to hypocrisy. My dorsal nerve? HA! You wish.

 

Winks? Yes, I formerly inserted those when I would be dealing with juvenile mentality, and you are right, I should have been using them with you.

 

The difference is your hypocrisy, which is to be expected from an unbalanced left leaning "progressive" Dorothy Parker wannabe.

Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Buttercup:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Buttercup:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

Hey buttercup, I have a little gasoline for the fire of your indignation. Hillary Clinton is a flabby old bag with cankles, and Scott Brown is correct, thank G-D there are no naked pictures of the socialist broom rider Elizabeth Warren.

 

Funny thing I didn't see you attacking "Contendah" for his post belittling Chris Christie's appearance here, but then it was not expected....

============================================================================

 

I'm guessing you're at least in your 50's, Mark; therefore, I'm also guessing your wife - if you were able to manage such a contract with a free-thinking female - is at least in her 50's, too.  I'm also guessing she probably doesn't look like Gisele Bündchen about now.  So if she's not a "babe," you're probably cheating on her - again, if you were able to manage such a feat with a free-thinking female - because you wouldn't want to wake up next to a "flabby old bag with cankles" every day, now would you?

 

Well you got my age group right, but since I’ve stated that in the past, your guess is no great feat. Nice ad hominem you’ve begun here. 

 

Women like Warren who are educated, hold prestigious jobs, think and reason for themselves, and can give as good as they get in debates intimidate you don't they?  I wonder if it's the misfortune of living with the affliction of underdeveloped genitals that compels men like you to lash out and say nasty things about women like Warren - not to mention encourages y'all to buy big trucks and big guns, and talk about what manly-men you are...but I digress.

 

What do you know of my genitals? Nothing I’ll wager, even though you imply that you have divined such information somehow. I was “compelled” post what I did because you so-called “progressives” are hypocrites as clearly demonstrated by the lack of reaction to Contendah’s post about Chris Christie’s appearance. Yes appearance, because Contendah never mentioned his health in his post, he only made derisive remarks about Christie’s appearance.
 
As far as the gravitas of educated women(or men for that matter), I’ll paraphrase Mark Twain, “Don’t confuse education with intelligence.”
 
Big trucks? I’m into “rat rods” as far as my shallow fascination with vehicles is concerned, big trucks are only practical if you have a big job to do that requires such a vehicle, therefore big trucks are impractical for me. It is the same with guns, and tools for that matter. The reason there are so many types, is there are many jobs to be done. I mean you don’t shoot rabbits with a Barrett 50cal, you don’t hunt deer with a two shot 22cal derringer, and you don’t use either for home defense. Again, it is the matter of practicality in using the correct tool for the job to be done, but  I’m guessing you’re educated, right? English major?

 

And speaking of underdeveloped genitals, super-morbidly obese men like Christie often suffer from that same malady.  No wonder he's so angry.  But to answer your question, Christie is dangerously overweight and not the best person to be a leader of anything, considering he's one T-bone steak away from a massive heart attack and sudden death.  Facts are facts, Marky Mark.

 

Sure, facts are facts. Tell me when you state one. You seem to be bound up in some fascination over male genitalia, seemingly with a special penchant for the genitals of obese men, which could lead a person to wonder if it’s the misfortune of unresolved penile envy that motivates you. Finally, you start to spin like your avatar when you speciously interject deceitfully false health concerns over Chris Christie’s weight, when you KNOW the reference was to Contendah’s attack on Christies’ appearance. Nice try. Fail.

============================================================================

 

Wow!  That's quite a reaction there, Mark.  I must have hit a nerve - the dorsal nerve, apparently. 

 

But what happened to all the winks you used to insert in your posts?  I was expecting at least 112 of those.


Oh, and I didn't read any of Contendah’s thread about Chris Christie.  I only check this forum every few weeks or so now.  There's no denying that Christie meets the definition of fat; how a woman looks without clothes is opinion.  That's the difference, to me. 

 

I always react to hypocrisy. My dorsal nerve? HA! You wish.

 

Winks? Yes, I formerly inserted those when I would be dealing with juvenile mentality, and you are right, I should have been using them with you.

 

The difference is your hypocrisy, which is to be expected from an unbalanced left leaning "progressive" Dorothy Parker wannabe.

Yes, without a doubt, the ignorant Southern redneck prospective is always more sensible. Minnie Pearl beats Dorothy Parker any day, especially in the trailer parks of the Southern "elite".

Originally Posted by JimiHendrix:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Buttercup:
Originally Posted by marksw59:
Originally Posted by Buttercup:
Originally Posted by marksw59:

Hey buttercup, I have a little gasoline for the fire of your indignation. Hillary Clinton is a flabby old bag with cankles, and Scott Brown is correct, thank G-D there are no naked pictures of the socialist broom rider Elizabeth Warren.

 

Funny thing I didn't see you attacking "Contendah" for his post belittling Chris Christie's appearance here, but then it was not expected....

============================================================================

 

I'm guessing you're at least in your 50's, Mark; therefore, I'm also guessing your wife - if you were able to manage such a contract with a free-thinking female - is at least in her 50's, too.  I'm also guessing she probably doesn't look like Gisele Bündchen about now.  So if she's not a "babe," you're probably cheating on her - again, if you were able to manage such a feat with a free-thinking female - because you wouldn't want to wake up next to a "flabby old bag with cankles" every day, now would you?

 

Well you got my age group right, but since I’ve stated that in the past, your guess is no great feat. Nice ad hominem you’ve begun here. 

 

Women like Warren who are educated, hold prestigious jobs, think and reason for themselves, and can give as good as they get in debates intimidate you don't they?  I wonder if it's the misfortune of living with the affliction of underdeveloped genitals that compels men like you to lash out and say nasty things about women like Warren - not to mention encourages y'all to buy big trucks and big guns, and talk about what manly-men you are...but I digress.

 

What do you know of my genitals? Nothing I’ll wager, even though you imply that you have divined such information somehow. I was “compelled” post what I did because you so-called “progressives” are hypocrites as clearly demonstrated by the lack of reaction to Contendah’s post about Chris Christie’s appearance. Yes appearance, because Contendah never mentioned his health in his post, he only made derisive remarks about Christie’s appearance.
 
As far as the gravitas of educated women(or men for that matter), I’ll paraphrase Mark Twain, “Don’t confuse education with intelligence.”
 
Big trucks? I’m into “rat rods” as far as my shallow fascination with vehicles is concerned, big trucks are only practical if you have a big job to do that requires such a vehicle, therefore big trucks are impractical for me. It is the same with guns, and tools for that matter. The reason there are so many types, is there are many jobs to be done. I mean you don’t shoot rabbits with a Barrett 50cal, you don’t hunt deer with a two shot 22cal derringer, and you don’t use either for home defense. Again, it is the matter of practicality in using the correct tool for the job to be done, but  I’m guessing you’re educated, right? English major?

 

And speaking of underdeveloped genitals, super-morbidly obese men like Christie often suffer from that same malady.  No wonder he's so angry.  But to answer your question, Christie is dangerously overweight and not the best person to be a leader of anything, considering he's one T-bone steak away from a massive heart attack and sudden death.  Facts are facts, Marky Mark.

 

Sure, facts are facts. Tell me when you state one. You seem to be bound up in some fascination over male genitalia, seemingly with a special penchant for the genitals of obese men, which could lead a person to wonder if it’s the misfortune of unresolved penile envy that motivates you. Finally, you start to spin like your avatar when you speciously interject deceitfully false health concerns over Chris Christie’s weight, when you KNOW the reference was to Contendah’s attack on Christies’ appearance. Nice try. Fail.

============================================================================

 

Wow!  That's quite a reaction there, Mark.  I must have hit a nerve - the dorsal nerve, apparently. 

 

But what happened to all the winks you used to insert in your posts?  I was expecting at least 112 of those.


Oh, and I didn't read any of Contendah’s thread about Chris Christie.  I only check this forum every few weeks or so now.  There's no denying that Christie meets the definition of fat; how a woman looks without clothes is opinion.  That's the difference, to me. 

 

I always react to hypocrisy. My dorsal nerve? HA! You wish.

 

Winks? Yes, I formerly inserted those when I would be dealing with juvenile mentality, and you are right, I should have been using them with you.

 

The difference is your hypocrisy, which is to be expected from an unbalanced left leaning "progressive" Dorothy Parker wannabe.

Yes, without a doubt, the ignorant Southern redneck prospective is always more sensible. Minnie Pearl beats Dorothy Parker any day, especially in the trailer parks of the Southern "elite".

Who mentioned Minnie Pearl? Deriding the South is an odd fixation for someone supposedly living in Russellville Alabama.

i just see a bunch of Repubes getting upset about their right to see naked men.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Wow! The twists and turns you dimocrites can take. Buttercup went from someone, who happens to be a woman, getting their comeuppance from a man she tried to insult, to the size of obese men's genitals. Anyway-now  comes juan to twist it to someone being upset about their right to see naked men!! PLEASE show the route you took to get to that conclusion juan. All I see is a woman that thought she could hurl an insult but couldn't take it when it backfired on her. Now are we to presume that you juan, are upset because you think we're trying to ban/bar/stop/hinder you from seeing warren naked?

O No! summed it up.

Her remark to him reflected on his morals. HIS remark to HER reflected on her LOOKS. A persons moral choices have bearing in a political race. But his remark about her looks boils down to an all too common belief amongst certain males, that women are only good for one thing.

 

Repubes only care about other peoples moral, not their own.

 

Repubes are so simple minded in general that the hero of their party is an actor, a former Dem, and a union organizer.

Repubes are so simple minded in general that the hero of their party is an actor, a former Dem, and a union organizer.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Really? Odd, you'd think I'd know who that is if they're my hero. Brown's morals? What is wrong with what he did? Goodness, if you want to talk morals we could drag out a few of the dimocrites "heros". Does "depends on what is is" ring a bell?  Or how about this guy pictured below:

 

Reagan is the acknowledged savior of the present day Repube Party.  I just heard how Perry is being compared to Reagan because of the similarity of their hairstyle, and how the colr and style that was chosen on purpose to reflect Reagan. 

 

Clinton balanced the budget, created 25million jobs, and managed to avid any pointless wars, all with an oppositional Congress.  I dont care who or what he did in his office.  His morality, or lack of morality, doesnt affect me personally, and nor does it affect you, but it does give you something to whine about after the failure of the BushIIe presidency.

Gives ME something to whine about? I don't know if you could find a post I made, other than the one above, where I mentioned clinton. I only mentioned him because I thought you wanted to talk about "morals"  But we can't say the same about the dimocrites. ALL you do is whine and cry about Bush, which is surprising considering who you have in office now. You have a full time job worrying about what he's doing without climbing into the time machine and going back to try and find anything that will let you cry about Bush in every other post you make.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×