Skip to main content

Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
Originally Posted by gbrk:

 

Whether you believe homosexuality is a part of being born or from birth then if it is (which I personally believe it isn't) it is a product of the flesh and not the spirit and it is not something that God has made a person be.


_______________

When exactly did you decide that you were heterosexual?  I find it interesting that you keep denying scientific fact on a number of "issues".  Which part of the Theory of Gravity do you disagree with?

I don't believe sexuality or sexual attraction is a thing that is born in anyone.  You are either assuming or saying that a child has a sexual attraction toward another even as a toddler abut I believe that sexual attraction begins later in life as children grow and become aware of their sexuality.  I never accepted Freud's contention that a child sexually envies his mother or father for I don't think that sexuality is even a part of their life until later in their early years.   IF you, or others, want to believe otherwise in order to somehow rationalize or justify your own opinion then have at it but to make dogmatic statements of fact is just being gullible of something someone is telling you.

 

Scientific fact?  You yourself know that scientific facts change from time to time depending on what the particular subject is.  People do research all the time and come up with various conflicting conclusions.  One persons scientific fact is another's conjecture.  Like I said if you feel comfortable and all warm and fuzzy with your opinion that's great, for you, but I'm not accepting it and I'll continue to believe otherwise.

 

Originally Posted by gbrk:
Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
Originally Posted by gbrk:

 

Whether you believe homosexuality is a part of being born or from birth then if it is (which I personally believe it isn't) it is a product of the flesh and not the spirit and it is not something that God has made a person be.


_______________

When exactly did you decide that you were heterosexual?  I find it interesting that you keep denying scientific fact on a number of "issues".  Which part of the Theory of Gravity do you disagree with?

I don't believe sexuality or sexual attraction is a thing that is born in anyone.  You are either assuming or saying that a child has a sexual attraction toward another even as a toddler abut I believe that sexual attraction begins later in life as children grow and become aware of their sexuality.  I never accepted Freud's contention that a child sexually envies his mother or father for I don't think that sexuality is even a part of their life until later in their early years.   IF you, or others, want to believe otherwise in order to somehow rationalize or justify your own opinion then have at it but to make dogmatic statements of fact is just being gullible of something someone is telling you.

 

Scientific fact?  You yourself know that scientific facts change from time to time depending on what the particular subject is.  People do research all the time and come up with various conflicting conclusions.  One persons scientific fact is another's conjecture.  Like I said if you feel comfortable and all warm and fuzzy with your opinion that's great, for you, but I'm not accepting it and I'll continue to believe otherwise.

 

___________

Who said anything about Freud? While one study doesn't make a scientific fact, many do.  There is a difference between sexual attraction and sexual orientation.  So answer the question, one day you just decided that you would choose women over men, when was that, and why?  Until that day you could have gone either way?  When did you pick your eye color and handedness?

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by Not Shallow Not Slim:

Vic,

 

Calling homosexuals "deformed" or "ill" might be to miss the point.  A normal human population will contain a certain element of homosexuals.  Always has been that way.

 

Sort of like left handers.  A normal human population will include a certain number of people who are just different in that way.

 

FWIW, my observation has been that most people are born straight, some are born homosexual, and then some are born wobblers who can go either or both ways depending on upbringing and environment.

 

DF

___

NOT "[s]ort of like left-handers."  Left handedness is NOT a behavioral phenomenon.  Homosexuality IS.

Of course, certain behaviors are genetically part of the species.

 

DF

 
Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
Originally Posted by thehippiegirl is gone.:

Crusty, i appreciate your input, but you are assuming 'facts' that aren't in my post. apparently we disagree on what 'homosexual' is. i believe it's a chosen lifestyle, not God-given DNA, because God would have no reason to create what He defines as an 'abomination'. He is the Creator of the entire universe. we are created innocent and pure,  but what we choose to become in it is another matter entirely. His creation is good, and anything other than that has been tainted by man. there's really not much to discuss when we disagree on the very basis of the subject. 

________________

You would be wrong.  The science tells us that sexual preference is determined in fetal development with a genetic propensity.  As long as you dispute science, we will indeed disagree.  We also disagree on God's input into the fertilization process.

 

hg> i choose to believe God over science.

 

I'm curious, do you eat pork?

 

hg> actually i'm vegetarian.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

So you're a vegetarian-but do you eat pork? Many vegetarians do. Something tells me you fibbed so you could "skirt" the question.

 

sorry Best, didn't mean to confuse you. no, i don't eat pork, or any other meat. not sure why some vegetarians would eat pork, as you say. seems to defeat the purpose of being vegetarian. i am not vegan tho, they don't eat meat or animal products. (eggs, cheese, milk, etc.)

i don't 'fib', not worth what it would cost me in eternity. why would i care that you know i don't eat pork? i wouldn't have told you i'm vegetarian if i'd wanted to 'skirt' such  questions. 

being vegetarian is my personal choice for better health, no other reason.

hg<><

Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
Originally Posted by thehippiegirl is gone.:
 

hg> i choose to believe God over science.

 

I'm curious, do you eat pork?

 

hg> actually i'm vegetarian.

 

_____________

Interesting.  Are you a Christian Scientist?  Why not?

 

hg> no Crusty, i'm simply a Christian, a follower of Christ. 

 

Okay, vegetarian.  Do you wear any clothes with mixed fibers?  Have any tattoos?

 

hg> i wear clothes made from any cloth i want except wool, which irritates my skin. 

i do have several Christian tattoos. it has opened the door for me to share Christ with many people who have commented on them. 

sounds like you might think being vegetarian is tied to my faIth, not so. personally, i am vegetarian for better health, no other reason. 

Blessings to you, hg<><

Originally Posted by thehippiegirl is gone.:
Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
Originally Posted by thehippiegirl is gone.:
 

hg> i choose to believe God over science.

 

I'm curious, do you eat pork?

 

hg> actually i'm vegetarian.

 

_____________

Interesting.  Are you a Christian Scientist?  Why not?

 

hg> no Crusty, i'm simply a Christian, a follower of Christ. 

 

Okay, vegetarian.  Do you wear any clothes with mixed fibers?  Have any tattoos?

 

hg> i wear clothes made from any cloth i want except wool, which irritates my skin. 

i do have several Christian tattoos. it has opened the door for me to share Christ with many people who have commented on them. 

sounds like you might think being vegetarian is tied to my faIth, not so. personally, i am vegetarian for better health, no other reason. 

Blessings to you, hg<><

______________

Read Leviticus lately?

 

As for not being a Christian Scientist, why not?  If you believe God over science, that is the logical path.

quote:   Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
I'm curious, do you eat pork?  Read Leviticus lately?

Hi Crusty,

 

That is about as childish as your number game.  But, I do suppose some never outgrow the sandbox.

 

Regarding your questions above:  Research "Law versus Grace" and you will have your answer.  Then, their will be no more need for childish questions or games.   Good luck!

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Gimme A Hug

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Gimme A Hug
Originally Posted by thehippiegirl is gone.:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

So you're a vegetarian-but do you eat pork? Many vegetarians do. Something tells me you fibbed so you could "skirt" the question.

 

sorry Best, didn't mean to confuse you. no, i don't eat pork, or any other meat. not sure why some vegetarians would eat pork, as you say. seems to defeat the purpose of being vegetarian. i am not vegan tho, they don't eat meat or animal products. (eggs, cheese, milk, etc.)

i don't 'fib', not worth what it would cost me in eternity. why would i care that you know i don't eat pork? i wouldn't have told you i'm vegetarian if i'd wanted to 'skirt' such  questions. 

being vegetarian is my personal choice for better health, no other reason.

hg<><

================

You didn't confuse me, it's you that's confused. 

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:


Hi Crusty,

 

That is about as childish as your number game.  But, I do suppose some never outgrow the sandbox.

 

Regarding your questions above:  Research "Law versus Grace" and you will have your answer.  Then, their will be no more need for childish questions or games.   Good luck!

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

 

___________________

The questions aren't childish, Bill.  They are at the heart of showing the ridiculousness of your fundamentalist nonsense.   When you come up with a non-conflicted answer on topics like the literalness of the Bible, 6k year old earth, and your distorted take on homosexuality, then we can discuss "Law and Grace".  Until then, good luck!

 

Until then, just for the fun of it, I'll ask you one more time, does Leviticus apply or not?

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:
Hi Crusty,
That is about as childish as your number game.  But, I do suppose some never outgrow the sandbox.
Bill
______

Originally Posted by CrustyMac:

The questions aren't childish, Bill. 

______

Gosh, Crusty...doesn't it make you feel all warm & fuzzy to have the King of Childish cartoons call your Number System childish?

I guess some just never outgrow being a bully for Satan!

Number systems are used around the world in a multitude of situations.  They are designed to save time and promote accurate communication.  That I recognized a situation where a numbering system would work, and applied one, is somehow childish. I don't think so.

 

The real issue here is that Bill is just angry that the repetitiousness of his postings have been spotted, and that it is now quite obvious that he has absolutely nothing new, or even meaningful, to add to any conversation on the topic of religion.

 

"Childishness" is using the word "duh" in serious conversation, posting infantile cartoons, and not embracing a system that would save a large amount of time (a resource that Bill is running out of minute by minute) for more productive use.

 

Wah, wah, wah is all I'm hearing from Bill.

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Hi Crusty,

 

That is about as childish as your number game.  But, I do suppose some never outgrow the sandbox.

 

Regarding your questions above:  Research "Law versus Grace" and you will have your answer.  Then, their will be no more need for childish questions or games.   Good luck!

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

 

____________

Oh, and #9 would have been sufficient here.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Aren't left handed people evil? So of course any good christian would choose to be right handed, and also make their kiddies use their right hand.

 

No Best, I do not think that left handed people are evil.  I am left handed and I am not evil. Cute! Yes they use to make their kids use their right hand. Some teachers when I was in school would slap the left hand if they caught the child using it. I have even heard that they would tie the left arm behind the childs back to keep them from using it. I have also heard that left handed people have a neat and pretty handwriting. But really, I don't believe that it is evil to be left handed.

Originally Posted by LAH:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Aren't left handed people evil? So of course any good christian would choose to be right handed, and also make their kiddies use their right hand.

 

No Best, I do not think that left handed people are evil.  I am left handed and I am not evil. Cute! Yes they use to make their kids use their right hand. Some teachers when I was in school would slap the left hand if they caught the child using it. I have even heard that they would tie the left arm behind the childs back to keep them from using it. I have also heard that left handed people have a neat and pretty handwriting. But really, I don't believe that it is evil to be left handed.

************************

 

My post was to show how superstitious and ignorant people were, and even still are about some things.

quote:   Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
quote:   Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Regarding your questions above:  Research "Law versus Grace" and you will have your answer.  Then, their will be no more need for childish questions or games.   Good luck!   God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,  Bill

The questions aren't childish, Bill.  They are at the heart of showing the ridiculousness of your fundamentalist nonsense.   When you come up with a non-conflicted answer on topics like the literalness of the Bible, 6k year old earth, and your distorted take on homosexuality, then we can discuss "Law and Grace".  Until then, good luck!    Until then, just for the fun of it, I'll ask you one more time, does Leviticus apply or not?


Hi Crusty,

 

Yes, every book, every verse in the Bible counts -- and without them, no theology is truly valid.   However, to truly understand how this applies, one must understand the concept of "Law versus Grace."

 

And, it is very obvious that you, either, do not understand "Law versus Grace" -- in which case you can fix that problem by finding a solid Christ-centered, Bible-teaching church and becoming involved in their Bible studies.

 

Or, you do understand "Law versus Grace" and just want to continue playing your childish games as you emulate your atheist friends and comrades. 

 

Either way, my Friend, you are in need of serious spiritual help.   Do yourself a favor and find that church I mention above.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Bless My Friend Mouse

Attachments

Images (2)
  • Bless My Friend Mouse
  • Bless My Friend Mouse
Last edited by Bill Gray
Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Hi Crusty,

 

Yes, every book, every verse in the Bible counts -- and without them, no theology is truly valid.   However, to truly understand how this applies, one must understand the concept of "Law versus Grace."

 

And, it is very obvious that you, either, do not understand "Law versus Grace" -- in which case you can fix that problem by finding a solid Christ-centered, Bible-teaching church and becoming involved in their Bible studies.

 

Or, you do understand "Law versus Grace" and just want to continue playing your childish games as you emulate your atheist friends and comrades. 

 

Either way, my Friend, you are in need of serious spiritual help.   Do yourself a favor and find that church I mention above.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

 

This is a #6 and a big fat #7.  So do you eat pork?  You say Leviticus applies, then it doesn't.  Can't be both, regardless of your fundamentalist runaround.  For the record (again), my house is in order.  You need to worry about yours and your mental health.  You obviously have Alzheimer's.

Hi Crusty,

 

May I make a suggestion?  Why don't you go seclude yourself for a while, take your childish questions with you -- and, WHEN you learn the meaning of "Law versus Grace" -- come back and we will be able to have an adult dialogue.

 

Now, my Friend, if, for whatever reason, you do not have the ability to understand the concept of "Law versus Grace" -- please tell me so we can get you the help you need.  If you will admit that you cannot grasp that concept -- then, I will be happy to help you.

 

So, what is it?  Are you just going to stick you head in the sand?  Or, will you admit that you CANNOT understand?  Or, will you finally admit that you are just playing a childish game and are feverishly attempting to emulate your atheist idols?  You tell us which is the true situation with you.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Bless My Friend Mouse

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Bless My Friend Mouse
Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Hi Crusty,

 

May I make a suggestion?  Why don't you go seclude yourself for a while, take your childish questions with you -- and, WHEN you learn the meaning of "Law versus Grace" -- come back and we will be able to have an adult dialogue.

 

Now, my Friend, if, for whatever reason, you do not have the ability to understand the concept of "Law versus Grace" -- please tell me so we can get you the help you need.  If you will admit that you cannot grasp that concept -- then, I will be happy to help you.

 

So, what is it?  Are you just going to stick you head in the sand?  Or, will you admit that you CANNOT understand?  Or, will you finally admit that you are just playing a childish game and are feverishly attempting to emulate your atheist idols?  You tell us which is the true situation with you.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

 

_____________________

#9.  If you don't like my questions, you don't have to answer them.  Oh, wait.... you never do.  I'm here as long as you are, Bill, pointing out the ridiculous contradictions and nonsense of fundamentalist Christians such as yourself.  Get used to it.

 

I understand your grace vs law argument.  I don't agree with the twisted, convoluted, and fallacious logic it takes to make your case. 

 

The rest of your post is just a big fat #8. 

 

Have a wonderfully blissed day, Bill.

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by thehippiegirl is gone.:

i do have several Christian tattoos.

__________

Are you the one people call the crazy tattoo lady that preaches on the corners of Florence on Friday & Saturday nights?

 

hg> nope, not me, but i would if God told me to. i have heard a guy preach on the corner across from Rosies at First Fridays, tho i didn't notice if he had any tattoos.

Originally Posted by thehippiegirl is gone.:
 

 

hg> i choose to believe God over science.

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

and here we have the base and root of the reason that some of us stand up and speak out against religion -

" i don't care what you can prove,  it goes against what i choose to believe, so you are wrong"

this is THE perfect example of how religion is harmful to everyone, especially the people who follow it's fictional tenants. the real horrors start when the person who disregards reason and facts and tries to force their belief onto others.

someone once asked ' why do atheist come into a religion forum?" 

this is why. to help stop conscious willful ignorance, and to attempt to stem the spread of same to other people.

i'm not an atheist, but until the fundies stop trying to put their version of the bible into the government, i'm taking their side.

 

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by earthmomma:

I am curious! Did you obtain your tatoos while you were existing on nothing a year?  If so, were they donated or did they occur as stigmata?  Tthis seems as a logical pertinent question to me..

_______

Sounds like a logical question to me. I bet God told her to get them.

___________

I doubt that, since it is clearly not allowed in Leviticus. 

Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
Originally Posted by thehippiegirl is gone.:
Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
Originally Posted by thehippiegirl is gone.:
 

hg> i choose to believe God over science.

 

I'm curious, do you eat pork?

 

hg> actually i'm vegetarian.

 

_____________

Interesting.  Are you a Christian Scientist?  Why not?

 

hg> no Crusty, i'm simply a Christian, a follower of Christ. 

 

Okay, vegetarian.  Do you wear any clothes with mixed fibers?  Have any tattoos?

 

hg> i wear clothes made from any cloth i want except wool, which irritates my skin. 

i do have several Christian tattoos. it has opened the door for me to share Christ with many people who have commented on them. 

sounds like you might think being vegetarian is tied to my faIth, not so. personally, i am vegetarian for better health, no other reason. 

Blessings to you, hg<><

______________

Read Leviticus lately?

hg> actually i have read in Lev recently. the Laws stated there were fulfilled when Jesus died on the cross for us. 

 

As for not being a Christian Scientist, why not?  If you believe God over science, that is the logical path.

hg> i've never been one to follow the 'logical'. remember, i worship the God of the impossible, 'logical' pales in comparison.

hg<><

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×