Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

There are far TOO FEW 'parents' today that take an active role in raising their children and being involved in their childrens' education. Instead, there are 'birthers' that only seem interested in 'seeing how big of a pain in the ass' they can be for their childrens' school(s). It's almost like it's a form of 'entertainment' for them. Why schools continue to allow such behavior from these imbeciles is mind boggling.

divorce rate effects the parent active role.  as far as schools, I remember Teachers felt parents should be seen not heard.  They wanted us to volunteer, however didn't want input.   Two major challenges, one the unions, two those who can do, those who can't teach.  Many teachers I knew, struggled in the real world, while the union filled their pockets

@1130 posted:

divorce rate effects the parent active role.  as far as schools, I remember Teachers felt parents should be seen not heard.  They wanted us to volunteer, however didn't want input.   Two major challenges, one the unions, two those who can do, those who can't teach.  Many teachers I knew, struggled in the real world, while the union filled their pockets

GOP Michigan education official: State should end required school attendance

https://www.detroitnews.com/st...tendance/8887757002/

Spiderman GIFs | Tenor

There are lots of single-parent families, but not because of divorce. Too many of today's younger students don't even know 'who their daddy is', mainly because 'he' and their mom never married, and as soon as 'he' found out their mom was pregnant, 'he' bailed on her. There are far too many 'sperm donors' and far too few 'dads'.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×