Skip to main content

Sorry to pass along this awful news around the holidays, but these are things we all need to be aware of. The following was written by Juan Cole, who is president of the Global Americana Institute:

http://www.juancole.com/2007/12/top-ten-myths-about-iraq-2007.html

"Top Ten Myths about Iraq 2007

10. Myth: The US public no longer sees Iraq as a central issue in the 2008 presidential campaign.



In a recent ABC News/ Washington Post poll, Iraq and the economy were virtually tied among voters nationally, with nearly a quarter of voters in each case saying it was their number one issue. The economy had become more important to them than in previous months (in November only 14% said it was their most pressing concern), but Iraq still rivals it as an issue!


9. Myth: There have been steps toward religious and political reconciliation in Iraq in 2007. Fact: The government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has for the moment lost the support of the Sunni Arabs in parliament. The Sunnis in his cabinet have resigned. Even some Shiite parties have abandoned the government. Sunni Arabs, who are aware that under his government Sunnis have largely been ethnically cleansed from Baghdad, see al-Maliki as a sectarian politician uninterested in the welfare of Sunnis.

8. Myth: The US troop surge stopped the civil war that had been raging between Sunni Arabs and Shiites in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad.


Fact: The civil war in Baghdad escalated during the US troop escalation. Between January, 2007, and July, 2007, Baghdad went from 65% Shiite to 75% Shiite. UN polling among Iraqi refugees in Syria suggests that 78% are from Baghdad and that nearly a million refugees relocated to Syria from Iraq in 2007 alone. This data suggests that over 700,000 residents of Baghdad have fled this city of 6 million during the US 'surge,' or more than 10 percent of the capital's population. Among the primary effects of the 'surge' has been to turn Baghdad into an overwhelmingly Shiite city and to displace hundreds of thousands of Iraqis from the capital.


7. Myth: Iran was supplying explosively formed projectiles (a deadly form of roadside bomb) to Salafi Jihadi (radical Sunni) guerrilla groups in Iraq. Fact: Iran has not been proved to have sent weapons to any Iraqi guerrillas at all. It certainly would not send weapons to those who have a raging hostility toward Shiites. (Iran may have supplied war materiel to its client, the Supreme Islamic Council of Iraq (ISCI), which was then sold off from warehouses because of graft, going on the arms market and being bought by guerrillas and militiamen.

6. Myth: The US overthrow of the Baath regime and military occupation of Iraq has helped liberate Iraqi women. Fact: Iraqi women have suffered significant reversals of status, ability to circulate freely, and economic situation under the Bush administration.

5. Myth: Some progress has been made by the Iraqi government in meeting the "benchmarks" worked out with the Bush administration. Fact: in the words of Democratic Senator Carl Levin, "Those legislative benchmarks include approving a hydrocarbon law, approving a debaathification law, completing the work of a constitutional review committee, and holding provincial elections. Those commitments, made 1 1/2 years ago, which were to have been completed by January of 2007, have not yet been kept by the Iraqi political leaders despite the breathing space the surge has provided."

4. Myth: The Sunni Arab "Awakening Councils," who are on the US payroll, are reconciling with the Shiite government of PM Nuri al-Maliki even as they take on al-Qaeda remnants. Fact: In interviews with the Western press, Awakening Council tribesmen often speak of attacking the Shiites after they have polished off al-Qaeda. A major pollster working in Iraq observed,
' Most of the recent survey results he has seen about political reconciliation, Warshaw said, are "more about [Iraqis] reconciling with the United States within their own particular territory, like in Anbar. . . . But it doesn't say anything about how Sunni groups feel about Shiite groups in Baghdad." Warshaw added: "In Iraq, I just don't hear statements that come from any of the Sunni, Shiite or Kurdish groups that say 'We recognize that we need to share power with the others, that we can't truly dominate.' " ' '
The polling shows that "the Iraqi government has still made no significant progress toward its fundamental goal of national reconciliation."

3. Myth: The Iraqi north is relatively quiet and a site of economic growth. Fact: The subterranean battle among Kurds, Turkmen and Arabs for control of the oil-rich Kirkuk province makes the Iraqi north a political mine field. Kurdistan now also hosts the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) guerrillas that sneak over the border and kill Turkish troops. The north is so unstable that the Iraqi north is now undergoing regular bombing raids from Turkey.

2. Myth: Iraq has been "calm" in fall of 2007 and the Iraqi public, despite some grumbling, is not eager for the US to depart. Fact: in the past 6 weeks, there have been an average of 600 attacks a month, or 20 a day, which has held steady since the beginning of November. About 600 civilians are being killed in direct political violence per month, but that number excludes deaths of soldiers and police. Across the board, Iraqis believe that their conflicts are mainly caused by the US military presence and they are eager for it to end.

1. Myth: The reduction in violence in Iraq is mostly because of the escalation in the number of US troops, or "surge."


Fact: Although violence has been reduced in Iraq, much of the reduction did not take place because of US troop activity. Guerrilla attacks in al-Anbar Province were reduced from 400 a week to 100 a week between July, 2006 and July, 2007. But there was no significant US troop escalation in al-Anbar. Likewise, attacks on British troops in Basra have declined precipitously since they were moved out to the airport away from population centers. But this change had nothing to do with US troops."
(end quote)

So before everyone starts patting themselves on the back and celebrating how successful our military actions in Iraq are, pause a moment to review the facts.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I know #7 is a lie. I have a cousin who was there. He told me that it was pretty much common knowledge that Iran was sneaking weapons and fighters into the country. People from Iran speak differently from Iraq and he quickly learned the difference. When you stop a car loaded with weapons near the border and the guys driving claim to be Iraqis, but speak like Iranians, it doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out what's going on.
The silence on Iraq in the past couple of months is almost scary. Hello people! We want the government-controlled media to stick a pacifier in our mouths and make us feel like our hunger to believe there is good news in the Middle East is being satiated. We don't want to hear the reasons behind the so-called "success" of the recent drop in violent attacks and American deaths (for which we are all grateful). We just want to keep sucking on our pacifiers because right now it is at least something. We don't want to face the fact that the real bottle of sustinence is not out there.

To understand the present lull, we need to understand the role of Moqtada al-Sadr. Just that alone will make you jumpy when "success" is mentioned. Read both sides of some of the books published recently by retired military commanders from Iraq.

The myths backing up the news and the statistics pacify many people. We need to educate ourselves. A good place to start is with a little history. Some great reads are "All the Shah's Men," or "The Seven Sisters." Get a little bit of a feel for the dynamics of the whoe area and the past half-century of American involvement.

If you can't make yourself read that kind of stuff, go with fiction. "The Kite Runner" was a best seller for many reasons. It's been interesting to discuss it with people. It's not the most well-written book. It's a riviting story, but for no particular reason. But the thing I hear from SO many people is, "I just didn't know anything about Afghanistan." People are hungry to know. We're starting to have a need (although still too little, too late) to find out what we're sending our boys to die for.

If you're not a reader, see the movie. The movie does about as much justice to the book as it can, but you do miss so much background information. But a very important scene is the stadium scene. Just that image of all the bearded men and the burqua-clad women watching a soccer game is haunting. Hosseni's newest book, "A Thousand Splendid Suns," has even less literary merits, but gives you a great feel for the country through decades of foreign occupation and militant control, and what roll the regimes WE (the good ol, U S of A) have put in place, has played in these dynamics. Another book that gives you a feel for it is "Reading Lolita in Tehran."

I don't know what the answer is. I am an independent voter who is very confused at this point. BUT, I have learned that THIS is the most important issue facing our country, our world and life as we know it. It's the most important humanitarian issue facing us. I have strong feelings about a lot of social issues, but whether or not women have a right to choose, whether or not gays have rights, whether or not embryos are protected, whether or not we have prayer in the schools, whether or not evolution is taught in the schools, etc., really has no bearing on whether or not my granddaughter will be wearing a burqua (I don't need the evangelicals arguing this point with me).

READ EVERYTHING, read both sides. Don't just take the pacifier and suck on it. Don't be satisfied with the news stories about the "success" in Iraq or the ones about all the myths about the "successes" just because one story feels good to read it. Base your vote and your decisions on all the information you've been able to gather from all sources. If we're educated, we can ask questions of our elected leaders or our candidates. We can make them answer and hold them accountable.
The effect of the troop surge as per se evidence of success is an example of David Hackett Fisher's "post hoc propter hoc" logical fallacy. The Latin simply means after this, because of this. In a dynamic fluid complex system, as is any war, or anything fouled by human hands and minds, cause and effect are rarely so simple as "He died from cancer."

Many will disagree with Juan Cole's analyses, but Dr. Cole has an advantage we do not: he reads Arabic and English both fluently.

Actually, the creation of Iraq by Whitehall and the Quai d'Orsay was a grave mistake in hindsight, three ex-Ottoman villayets were hobbled together to form a country and a Hashemite Sunni king was imported from Mecca to be king. This was a form of payment of the Sharif of Mecca supporting the British in the First World War.

It appears that no one asked the various communities of present day Iraq what form of government they wanted or who should be their king, nor why a Sunni Arab -- a minority of the Mesopotamian population -- should be king.

The Ottomans ruled under a policy of benign neglect, by and large, trying to keep the various millets (religious and ethnic groups) from fighting one another in Mesopotamia.

Well, we don't have any pashas or beys nowadays, and the Turks are now thankful they are shed of the Arabs in the empire, save for that blasted oil!

Were it not for oil, Iraq would be notable for only its history and be the equivalent of Chamberlain's "a little country far away of which we know little." But Chamberlain was a dolt, speaking of Bohemia and Slovakia as if they were not bordering Austria, Hungary, and Germany!

I believe that to attribute purely US force to any success is to fall victim to what Edward Said termed "Orientalism," that is, the idolized or pejoritive notion that Arabs and other "Easterners" are somehow culturally lacking in comparison to Europeans, and need European guidance in matters public. We must give credit where it is due, and in this case, the self-partition of the city of Baghdad into quarters may have a lot to do with the lowering of overt violence.
Having been to the Kurdish area several times, I know this to be untrue. The turkish bombimg was at a isolated camp in rugged terrain ner the border. Kurdish fighters going into Turkey are down to about 200. And, money flees from areas of turmoil:

Abu Dhabi-based Rotana Hotels said on Tuesday it would develop a $55 million five-star property in Arbil in Iraq's Kurdish region, which has largely been spared the violence affecting the rest of the country.
http://www.arabianbusiness.com/499263-five-star-luxury-for-northern-iraq

DOHUK, (Southern Kurdistan)-- On a recent afternoon in this northern Iraqi city, children romped about a lawn and adults munched cake on land that was once a base for Saddam Hussein's military. The crowd had gathered for the grand opening of a new home-furnishings outlet in
Dream City -- a megastore and amusement-park complex.

Entrepreneur Hamid Hajji Mashod rattled off his plans for the former military site: twin office towers, a hotel, a Coca-Cola bottling franchise. Standing amid carefully tended violets and marigolds, Mr. Mashod saw the blossoms symbolizing a new era for the region, home to most of Iraq's ethnic Kurdish minority. "Our homeland is like a flower," he said.

Unabashedly pro-American, secular and democratic, the Kurdish north is the one part of the country that's living up to the Bush administration's vision of postwar Iraq. The problem: The Kurdish population is showing little interest in converging with the rest of the country -- and its strong independent streak could hamper efforts to bring Iraq under one central government.
http://home.cogeco.ca/~kurdistan3/21-5-04-kurdish-success-harder-with-irq.htm

DOHUK, Iraq, Nov. 6 — Viewed from the outside, Iraqi Kurdistan looks close to war. Tens of thousands of Turkish troops are amassed on the border. And thousands of Iraqi Kurdish pesh merga fighters have taken up positions in the Mateen Mountains, ready for a counterattack, their local commanders say, should any Turkish operation hit civilians.
But wander the markets and byways here and a different reality comes into view, helping to explain why, despite bellicose Turkish threats, an all-out armed conflict may be less likely than is widely understood: the growing prosperity of this region is largely Turkish in origin.
In other words, while Turkey has been traditionally wary of the Kurds of Iraq, it is heavily invested here, an offshoot of its own rising wealth. Iraqi Kurdistan is also a robust export market for Turkish farmers and factory owners, who would suffer if that trade were curtailed.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/07/world/middleeast/07kurds.html

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×