I saw the news clip of 2 residences discussing the condition of Waters Edge Drive and have read the article that appeared on WAFF.com stating that the developer did not feel that he needed to be responsible for the current condition of the road because the road was there when he started developing the area on both sides of this road.
My thoughts - since this was a "private" road what made him think that he had the right to destroy the road bringing over weight vehicles and machines on the road to enable him to build houses for his own "personal" gain. Maybe he needs to share the profits from his development with all the residences to restore the road to it's original condition?
Original Post