Skip to main content

About those 'job creators': Cisco to cut 10,000 jobs while lobbying for tax break
WED JUL 13, 2011 AT 09:20 AM PDT

According to Bloomberg:

Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO), the largest networking-equipment company, may cut as many as 10,000 jobs, or about 14 percent of its workforce, to revive profit growth, according to two people familiar with the plans.
The cuts include as many as 7,000 jobs that would be eliminated by the end of August, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the plans aren’t final. Cisco is also providing early-retirement packages to about 3,000 workers who accepted buyouts, the people said
.



Cisco's CEO is the ninth highest paid in America, with one-year total compensation of $37.9 million. But by corporate logic, the way to make the company more profitable is to get rid of thousands of workers' jobs without dinging the tens of millions of dollars in pay for the guy who's ultimately in charge.

The other big mainstay of corporate logic, of course, is that there's nothing some extra tax cuts won't make better, and Cisco is hewing to that as well. ThinkProgress reports that Cisco is part of a group of corporations calling themselves WinAmerica to argue for a corporate repatriation tax holiday, in which corporations would get to bring money they've stashed overseas to the U.S. at a sharply reduced tax rate.

Cisco has an effective tax rate of 19.8 percent and has avoided $7 billion in taxes since 2005.

A tax repatriation holiday would be a massive windfall for a few corporations like Cisco. But it would be bad news for the national budget and by extension for the rest of us. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities explains:

a new tax holiday would increase budget deficits by tens of billions of dollars over the coming decade. And unlike the 2004 repatriation holiday, which was sold as a “one-time-only” event, a second holiday would send a powerful message to corporations to shift investment and jobs overseas and hold the profits there — until yet another tax holiday is declared. Indeed, enactment of another such tax holiday would further embed the shifting of investment, jobs, and profits overseas as a major tax avoidance strategy for many U.S. multinational corporations.



That's after the 2004 holiday was terrible for workers:

The evidence shows that firms mostly used the repatriated earnings not to invest in U.S. jobs or growth but for purposes that Congress sought to prohibit, such as repurchasing their own stock and paying bigger dividends to their shareholders. Moreover, many firms actually laid off large numbers of U.S. workers even as they reaped multi-billion-dollar benefits from the tax holiday and passed them on to shareholders.


 
Lay off workers? Check. Pay your CEO tens of millions of dollars regardless of what success or failure you're otherwise claiming? Check. Avoid taxes? Check. Lobby for lower taxes? Check. Yep, Cisco is fully in tune with the new class war.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/...ak?via=sidebyuserrec

 

Give them another tax break so they can (again) NOT create jobs? Are you kidding?

TAX THE RICH!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

_____

Cisco is like all too many other mega-corporations.  They continually try to find more ways to squeeze productivity out of their work forces.  They do this by cutting employees, then forcing remaining employees to work overtime, whether they want to or not.  The overtime work involves no increases in health care or certain other costs to the company, and thus is cheaper--even at time and-a-half-than the cost of hiring other employees to work normal hours to perform the same work. Another stratagem is to hire temporary, part-time workers who are not entitled to benefits other than Social Security withholding and workers' compensation.  Anything to cut payroll costs while maintaining productivity.   It is legal, but it is harsh.  It is Ayn Randism at work.

If tax breaks to the wealthy and corporate interest really created jobs, the country would be awash in un-filled jobs, every company would be paying top dollar and great benefits for workers to come work for them. The Bush tax cuts proved that trickle down economics was either a lie, or a myth depending upon your point of view. 

The Clinton tax hikes did more for our economy than any Republican "plan" ever even wished for.

Tax breaks do NOT increase jobs. 

Originally Posted by interventor1212:

Normally, tax breaks equals more cash in the economy.  More cash used to purchase goods and services, or invest.  You can pretty much track it.

 

This administration is by no means normal.  People and companies are uncertain of the future and are hoarding their cash.

 

 

Raise tax rates and they might put that money to work employing people and earning a hefty profit instead of sitting on it earning Money Market rates. 

 

And what is this "uncertainty" that seems to roll off everybody's lips so easily? People standing outside your door before opening time, clamoring to spend their paychecks in your store erases any "uncertainty." That won't happen until the hoarders of cash start hiring and cashed paychecks start being spent. Paychecks = demand = paychecks =demand ...

 

The beaches of Normandy and Iwo Jima weren't stormed by the likes of this current crop of fragile pansies petrified by fear, scared to move, afraid to be the first one to take the bold step. Risk = reward, and the first to move will make out like a bandit.

 

But if you're sitting on trillions of dollars earning millions of dollars at Money Market rates, all you have to do is sit at the table like Scrooge McDuck and count your millions. Lazy second-generation nouveaux riches!

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×