Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

 I didn't "bring up" Serbia to show hatred for clinton. That was a response to your calling Bush a war criminal. If you bother to read and or google you will find plenty of people that think clinton is a war criminal. And obama "got" osama about as much as I did.

Sorry , but it is not I that called Bush a war chriminal, it is other countries. (although I agree). As far as I know, there is no international arrest warrant on Clinton, as he travels world wide with his humane mission.

Obama made a campaign promise that he would get the head of Al Queda, even if it ment going into Pakistan .Remember ?

He ordered the CIA to find UBL (by contrast Bush quit even looiking for him- said  he didn't care one way or the other) Trouble with Bush's statement is that I and I believe most Americans DID still care.

The CIA found UBL, and Obama gave the order to go get him. A very risky move by sending military personnel into the compound instead of using a drone. Had it gone bad, I suspect you would have blamed Obama for the "failure" .

However, Obama's resolve, and his orders did the job,. You may not want him to get any credit, but we all know the truth.  Actually, Obama has whittled down the command heads of Al Queda quite a bit, way more than did Bush.  So YES, Obama got Osama, - it is what it is.

Well seeweed, other countries call clinton a war criminal too. I find it odd that you'd try to make a difference in the two but then again I shouldn't because democrits seem to think the things they do are only "wrong" or "criminal" if republicans do it too. You can't impress me with anything obama "did" because I read the reports and even though they ask his permission they said it was a "go" on osama whether or not obama approved. That is the truth of the matter. All they did was give him a chance to save face. As far as "hating" them, I think as much of them as you do Bush. But as with anything as far as democrits are concerned, you are allowed to spew hatred towards Bush and we're supposed to love the demo presidents.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Well seeweed, other countries call clinton a war criminal too. I find it odd that you'd try to make a difference in the two but then again I shouldn't because democrits seem to think the things they do are only "wrong" or "criminal" if republicans do it too. You can't impress me with anything obama "did" because I read the reports and even though they ask his permission they said it was a "go" on osama whether or not obama approved. That is the truth of the matter. All they did was give him a chance to save face. As far as "hating" them, I think as much of them as you do Bush. But as with anything as far as democrits are concerned, you are allowed to spew hatred towards Bush and we're supposed to love the demo presidents.


You are psychotic.

 

You think the rest of the world shares the same conspiracy theories that American Repubes do?

 

No country is seeking to arrest Clinton.

 

The truth is that Mr. OBama had the final say on the perhaps illegal entry of Pakistan to assassinate a foreign national.

 

The odd fact is that Qdaffy was actually harboring terrorists and participated in acts which killed Americans, yet BushIIe wasnt interested in invading and occupying Libya.  Libya is also further along in building nuclear weapons.  Only BushIIe knows the reasoning for making such illogical decisions. 

Clinton never expressed any desire or intent to protect Americans from the threat of terrorism beyond the continental US. 

 

BushIIe had his own motives for invading Iraq.  THe CIA is not as stoopid as to base a recommendation to initiate military action on another sovereign country on the basis of the story of one informant, an informant the Germans had termed unreliable to the CIA.  Plus, why was there no declaration of war?  the WMDs were claimed to be a direct threat to the USA, and we took the entire AFUS there to eliminate the threat, yet we did it without any Constitutional authority. 

 

At least it will all be over soon, and the world is now free from terrorists after only 10 years. 

He was busy balancing the budget.

 

Which was easy since he was too much of a wuss to go after terrorists and also had to deal with Monica in his lap all the time. No wars and no stock crashes does wonders for a do nothing president.

He had 5 chances to take out Osama then, was too chicken to do it.  Blame him for 9/11.

Originally Posted by Mr.Dittohead:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Don't you mean taking credit for the dot com boom?


Waah.  Waah.  Waah.

 

A Dem pres balanced the budget and killed the worlds most dangerous criminals,  while YOUR pres doubled the national debt and got 10,000 Americans KIA.  Yeah, you dont have a chance in 2012. 

With Obama spending trillions of dollars on wasted green energy and plants that move overseas, he doesn't have much of a chance to blame any one now. Unemployment is still over 9%, add in those returning soldiers and watch it go up and up. His approval rating is below 50%, Cain beats him in a head to head poll, and Obamacare is falling apart.

 

Keep dreaming.

Waah. Waah. Waah.

 

A Dem pres balanced the budget and killed the worlds most dangerous criminals, while YOUR pres doubled the national debt and got 10,000 Americans KIA. Yeah, you dont have a chance in 2012.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

No balanced budget and and imaginary surplus. Some accomplishment. And obama had nothing to do with osama or gadhafi's death. Both would have happened without him. IF obama is elected again no one will have a chance in 2012.

Oh well. Whatever. Maybe if you Google it you might see the meaninglessness. I doubt it, though. I have decided that you are just dumber than dirt.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Well jimma, if you want to argue with the facts I can't help you. I think you just want to argue and that's why you never do any research before you run in, post, and make yourself look even sillier than the last post you made. Dumber than dirt? You'd have to study for years and cheat to even be as smart as dirt.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Oh well. Whatever. Maybe if you Google it you might see the meaninglessness. I doubt it, though. I have decided that you are just dumber than dirt.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Well jimma, if you want to argue with the facts I can't help you. I think you just want to argue and that's why you never do any research before you run in, post, and make yourself look even sillier than the last post you made. Dumber than dirt? You'd have to study for years and cheat to even be as smart as dirt.

Whatever.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×