Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by budsfarm:
Because many folks don’t correlate threads much less more than one page prior to what they are reading on the last post.

It has to do with {the lack of} attention span. Not really funny. Just so sad these discussions often pass for intelligent conversations in the minds of the verbal jousters.


I think that's true in the food section, Bud, but not in news, etc. See my posts. I tried to add a link to an open topic this morning and it would only let me start a new one. I think the same thing happened to TK.
quote:
Originally posted by FirenzeVeritas:
quote:
Originally posted by budsfarm:
Because many folks don’t correlate threads much less more than one page prior to what they are reading on the last post.

It has to do with {the lack of} attention span. Not really funny. Just so sad these discussions often pass for intelligent conversations in the minds of the verbal jousters.


I think that's true in the food section, Bud, but not in news, etc. See my posts. I tried to add a link to an open topic this morning and it would only let me start a new one. I think the same thing happened to TK.


When there are glitches, I understand as anyone would. Personally, though I've never experienced the problem, I accept your explanation. But when there are not, I stand by my comment. There are many folks who pay no attention to current threads much less a couple of post preceeding their comment. Irrelevant {aka hi-jacking} and redundant come to mind.

Add Reply


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×