Which really is more reasonable to assume is likely?
That creation was the result of a determined
process set about by a Deity/Creator who
brought about life, planets, space and all we
see and are in a way that is beyond human
understanding or beyond our limited minds
ability to comprehend or reproduce.
{GOD} ----> Creation from an inconceivable and mysterious process from a undefinable and all powerful source beyond human understanding that because of His very nature we just call Him God with the understanding that God has no sex, form or human definition but rather our faith that it is possible such a power exist without having to totally define and understand/comprehend i
or
That everything living and non-living
traces it's existance to a single atom/
element that somehow was a part of
an unprecedented release and creation
of energy creating objects of mass out of NOTHING
{Nothing (Absence of everything)} ----> Yields all matter, creation, life and space
Science and those who refuse to consider the possibility of God must manufacture or explain the creation of everything in terms that cannot possibly originate from an intelligent or source/power we call or refer to as a deity/God. Unless someone actually knows, firsthand, 100%, without any doubt, of exactly how the Universe, space, stars, planets, etc came into existence and from what, when and where ... then they are just expressing their own belief, a measure of faith. Since they do not believe there is any possibility of God then their faith rest in another flawed, limited, human and some human's opinion of how things became as they are. That is the case unless the person has unquestionable first hand knowledge and experience to prove their theories and beliefs.
Also if a person rejects any possibility of God and declares that God does not exist then they should have some knowledge or verifiable reason to reinforce that belief. If that proof or evidence is that God doesn't manifest Himself unto them then the question presents itself as to what is so significant about them that would justify God presenting Himself unto them for proof? Ultimately, if a person is honest with themselves then they should admit that it is really impossible for them to prove that God doesn't exist. While they can, and do, say that there is no proof that God does exist, if they are honest, then they should acknowledge the reverse is also true. The point is that whether a person chooses to believe in God or reject God they are doing so out of faith alone, faith supported by sufficient proof acceptable to them alone.
What you basically have with many who take such staunch stands opposed to God do so blindly and in order to keep from having to confront the questions and evidences of potential existence of God's being they then have to turn a blind eye toward the possible and blindly devote their entire faith in the beliefs of yet another flawed and limited human and hypothesizes that eliminate any possibility of an intelligent and powerful living Creator.
Christians/Believers on the other hand, while they to can be said to place their faith in God account of another person's persuasive words and convincing, say many times that their Faith rest upon a very personal, real and intimate communication and contact from God's Holy Spirit in a most demonstrative way that eliminates all personal doubt. While this is a very subjective statement on behalf of the believer and subject to interpretation and suspicion by anyone hearing them, there is no proof or ability to prove that what they say is incorrect and false. Therefore a believer's faith very possibly can be justified by supernatural and divine means.
The real question is WHO are you placing your personal faith in and why? So much energy is being expended in claiming what so many say is factual is actually a delusion and not real at all without ever taking the time to seriously question if something may be there to justify so many having identical beliefs and faith in a divine, intelligent God/Deity. While a person can doubt what so many believers say is true they have no way to prove their doubts are legitimate and based in reality. Conversely Those who claim to know/experience God say that those who don't know God can know and experience God yet. It is our assertion that anyone can know/experience God but that no one can comprehend or conceive of who, or what, God is nor God's power or process of bringing about Creation.
As for myself I proudly proclaim I put my faith in God.